This is a transcript of a debate between Wichita mayoral candidates Brandon Whipple and Lily Wu. (more…)
Tag: Wichita Mayor
Wichita Mayoral Debate, September 25, 2023
This is a transcript of a debate between Wichita mayoral candidates Brandon Whipple and Lily Wu. The event was sponsored by KMUW radio in partnership with the Wichita Eagle, the Community Voice, and the Wichita Journalism Collaborative. A recording is here.
I produced a transcript by feeding an audio recording to an AI-based speech recognition system. The system recognized speaker voices and assigned them numbers. I edited to add the names Whipple and Wu to speakers 3 and 4. Other than that, I made no changes. It contains about 10,600 words. Download a pdf here.
Speaker 1
Welcome to the mayoral debate. I’m Luann Stevens. I’m with Kmu W and we’d like to welcome you to the debate between Brandon Whipple and Lily Wu. And thank you again so much for coming here tonight. Civic and civil discussions are important, and so is being an informed voter. And we are proud of being part of tonight’s event. I’d like to thank our partners in tonight’s event at The Wichita Eagle, the Community Voice and the Wichita Journalism Collaborative. And thank you to Roxies, always a great host and a supporter of the community. Thanks for providing this wonderful venue. Tonight’s debate is being aired live on kmu. It’s being streamed on the Eagles web page kansas.com and also at kw.org, and the audio will be posted later this week on kww.org. So thank you once again and let me introduce tonight’s. Moderator Kwa’s, director of news and public affairs, Tom Shine.
Speaker 2
Thank you. And and thank you for joining us tonight. I think it’s a, could be it could be a great night and and a good discussion to be had tonight. So thank you. Let me start by introducing the people who are going to help us with the night’s debate. Our media panel asking questions includes Kylie Cameron, who’s the City Hall reporter for KMW, Diane. Leffler opinion, editor of The Wichita Eagle and Bonita Gooch, editor in chief of the Community Voice. The event is also being sponsored by the Wichita Journalism Collaborative, which is a group of 11 community partners working to build a more engaged and informed community. All of the Members here on the media panel are members of the Wichita Journalism Collaborative, helping us keep time tonight are Jill Cassado and Sharon else Slager. The Wichita Metro chapter of the League of Women Voters. Also, with us tonight from the League of Women Voters are Carol Neal, Sandra Rankin and Joan Warren. If you are interested in registering to vote or need to check on your registration, they can help you with that tonight as well. A breakdown of tonight’s debate format. It’s pretty simple. Each candidate will have one minute to respond to a question. Each candidate will then have 30 seconds of rebuttal or to add more insight or context to their answer, we will alternate who answers each question first. Here’s the most important thing I will ask you to hold your applause until the debate is finished. This is a form. It is not a sporting event, so please hold your applause if you must cheer. Cheer internally, please. Any cheering limits the number of questions we can ask the candidates. That’s what we’re all here for, is to hear from the candidates not to hear people cheer. When we get finished, I will let you cheer as loud as you want, but Please wait until we’re done with the debate. So we’re going to begin with three minute opening statements from each candidate. The order was determined by coin flip prior to the debate, Brandon won the coin cost toin coss coin toss and will go first. He also received the first question and Lily will go first. When we do closing statements. Again, let’s hold our applause. We finish and we’ll do with opening statements. 3 minutes of Brandon Whipple.
Speaker 3 (Whipple)
We on. All right. Hey. Thank you. Witchcraft for being here tonight for listening. Welcome, everybody. My name is Brandon Whipple, and for the past four years, it’s been an honor to serve as your mayor. When I took office back in 2020, the city was in crisis. We were facing the worst combined economic budget and public health.
Speaker 2
You’re on.
Speaker 3 (Whipple)
Challenges that we face in over a lifetime, the Max was grounded and COVID disrupted every aspect of our lives. And today we’re batting the fentanyl and the mental health epidemic that has left so many families in distress. But what separates Wichita from from other cities is that we don’t run from the problems we face. We don’t hide our heads in the sand, but instead we roll up our sleeves and we face these issues head on together as a community. Today, Wichita is once again leading the state in economic growth and development. With the most diverse pipeline of industry and the lowest sustained unemployment rate we’ve ever had in the last four years, we’ve created thousands of new jobs and we have seen $1.8 billion of raw economic capital invested in our city and our. When I first came to Wichita over 20 years ago as an AmeriCorps member to teach at risk, kids at South High School, I got to tell you guys, I felt like I hit the jackpot. Growing up, my parents taught me that the values of hard work and that hard work was the way to get things done. My mom was a waitress and my dad is a Carpenter. My parents are some of the hardest working people I know. But because of high property taxes and lack of affordable housing in the Northeast, they will never own a home on their own. But thanks to Wichita, I was able to not only be the first in my family to graduate college, but also to purchase and own a home. And that’s why I serve to continue those kinds of opportunities for now and the next generation. That’s why our focus on cutting taxes and fees and keeping costs low in Wichita to make it easier for families to make ends meet. Now this election presents a clear choice. Either we continue on the current path to prosperity, powered by the voices of wichitas people, or return City Hall into a toxic far right dark money politics of Americans for Prosperity before serving as mayor, I’m proud to say that I served seven years in the Kansas legislature fighting for the people of South Wichita. Against Americans for prosperity’s deceptive tactics and the failed Brownback tax experiment that they. Imported my experience gives me the tools I needed to balance the city budget, grow the economy, cut taxes, and invest in record amounts in both fire police and infrastructure. And we put a stop to backroom deals. I’m the only candidate running with a plan to keep our economic momentum going while also addressing homelessness, mental health and finally fixing. Public transportation and tonight I am excited to take your questions and to share our vision for the next four years of here in Wichita. And I know that we can achieve this together together. Again, I’m your mayor, Brenda Whipple, and I hope to earn your vote tonight.
Speaker 2
Lily, 3 minutes.
Speaker 4 (Wu)
Thank you again to our hosts, including Roxy’s downtown. The last time I was here was at gridiron, but the last time I was here as a reporter was to share and memorialize wichitan and award-winning performer Carla Burns. At that time, I asked Rick a question about his best friend and what he would say. He told me Carla would want people to believe in themselves, keep going despite setbacks and Nos. I’m Lily Wu, your former local television journalist. I love Wichita, and I’m grateful for the opportunities this Community has shown me and my family. I stand here today of political outsider and a first time candidate running for office to become the next mayor of Wichita because I understand our community. And believe Wichita deserves better. And the proud daughter of working class parents. My mom, a hair stylist and a cook right here in Wichita, a city I have called home for 30 years. My family and I immigrated from my birth country of Guatemala to Wichita in 1993, and the proud product of Wichita. Public schools having attended Lawrence Ray Woodman, Truesdale Middle School, Wichita East High and the International Baccalaureate program, I was the 1st in my family to graduate from college. Because I was fortunate to win a Gore scholarship in 2003, which allowed me the opportunity to attend WSU and earn 2 degrees in international business and integrated marketing communication. I then went on to win a Rotary ambassadorial scholarship to pursue my masters in journalism. From the University of Hong Kong. I’ve served as a community volunteer for more than 20 years and for the past 12 years I’ve been your local journalist, both at cake and KWCH. I’ve been able to, fortunately, tell your good and sad stories, and I’m listening to you. You’re tired of increasing crime. You’re tired of rising taxes and costs, and you’re tired of partisan bickering and unethical behavior. So on the 30th anniversary of coming to America, I launched A mayoral campaign that is all for Wichita. My vision is rooted in ensuring public safety, strengthening our economy, restoring trust in City Hall, and building a united community. It’s time we come together, focus on the core services of local government and make Wichita a better place to live, work and raise a family. Thank you.
Speaker 2
We’ll go to questions now. As we said earlier, one minute each from each candidate and then 30 seconds from each candidate on each quest. Brandon, you have the first question from Kylie Cameron of KMW.
Speaker 3 (Whipple)
What you got for me, Kelly?
Speaker 5
In 2022. Sedgwick County recorded more than 300 overdose deaths, with most of those being fentanyl related. That’s double the amount of people who died from an overdose in 2019. What will you do as mayor to address substance use in the comma?
Speaker 3 (Whipple)
It’s a really good question and thank you for for asking it. You’re right. We’re in the middle of an epidemic with opioids and folks who know me know that I take this personally because my sister’s recovering addict and I’m from New Hampshire and our state just got hit so hard with the opioid crisis a couple of decades ago. So some of the things are doing at the city level is making sure we’re partnering with our community. Nonprofits are already doing some of this work. As you might know, we were able to not only decriminalize fentanyl test strips, but also get Narcan out to a nonprofit called Safe Streets. It was one vote that cost us maybe about $20,000 in money that came in that was directed for opioid. Reasons and we know for the data that we have saved over 400 lives, people who would have been dead if it wasn’t for that one vote. And as we continue, we know that fentanyl and overdoses, we have to arm our first responders with Narcan so they can bring people back to life. But once we see this rollout, we got to make sure we also have those social services. Necessary so that people can get the help that they need, particularly when it comes to such an addictive substance as fentanyl.
Speaker 4 (Wu)
That number is staggering. 300 individuals, those are someones mother. Daughter. Son. I had the opportunity to share those stories as a local reporter and I know the effects that it has not just on the individuals who overdose, but those who’ve been affected by those who’ve died from. Fentanyl overdose. I’ve had the opportunity to have conversations with our partners in Sedgwick County, both the day’s office and the Sedgwick County Sheriff’s deputies, and I know how critical it is that as a Community, we need to have a conversation about one pill can kill. It needs to be not only at the. School level but. It also needs to be across our community. We need to be concerned citizens and we can all be part of the solution. I’m proud to say that I’ve always said that public safety needs to be the number one concern in our community, and when we have a drug crisis in our Community, it’s a public safety issue and over the last four years, public safety has continued to be the number one problem that people want to see solved and something that has not been addressed.
Speaker 2
30 seconds, Mr. whip.
Speaker 3 (Whipple)
So the education campaign is part of it. The one pill can kill that’s only the first step, next step being harm reduction strategies that have been tested and proven to work in other areas. And you also need treatment facilities so that folks who are recovering can actually get the treatment that they need. And that’s why you need a mayor who understands public policy and understands where to look for the best policies as we move forward. Cuz I won’t let Wichita turn into some of those towns in New Hampshire where some of my friends are. Currently addicted and many of them have died from.
Speaker 2
30 seconds, miss.
Speaker 4 (Wu)
Wu and again those numbers are just during the same leadership period as as our current mayor. I want to reiterate that there are local resources available in our community. And we need to have greater awareness of those that provide services for those who are struggling with not just substance use issues, but also mental health. That is another critical issue in our community. And I believe that local government has a role to play, but our Community also has a greater role to play and I believe that. Each and every one of us has an opportunity to be part of the solution.
Speaker 2
Next question from Diane Leffler of The Wichita Eagle. Miss, will you up first?
Speaker 6
The state government has outlawed transgender people from using public restrooms corresponding to their gender identity and is requiring them to use facilities corresponding to the sex they were. Signed at birth. This creates a known risk that transgender individuals could be singled out for verbal and even physical abuse from individuals opposed to their identity. What can and should the city do to protect people’s right to use public restrooms without fear of harassment and or violence?
Speaker 4 (Wu)
I had an opportunity to speak with both the city manager and. Was assistant city managers last week. Asking them what have they seen as issues and they tell me whether a non discrimination ordinance that we currently have, they have not seen those issues. And again I want to reiterate that I am someone who respects all individuals. My mother who’s right there would never let me be someone. Other than someone who respects and loves others, so I want to make sure that everyone understands that I. Come from a point of view that respects all, but we also need to have accessible bathrooms for all. When I have elderly individuals that tell me there there are no bathrooms for them to take their elderly parents who cannot get into a bathroom, that’s a problem too. So we need to think more outside of traditional methods. And think about family bathrooms and I’m glad to hear that the city of Wichita now is seeing development in city properties that always have family bathrooms.
Speaker 2
Mr. Whipple one.
Speaker 3 (Whipple)
Minute. Sorry. Can you repeat the question?
Speaker 6
Yes, I can. The state government has outlawed transgender people from using public restrooms corresponding to their gender identity and is requiring them to use facilities corresponding to the sex they were assigned at birth. This creates a known risk that transgender individuals could be singled out for verbal and even physical abuse. From individuals opposed to their.
Speaker 3 (Whipple)
Alright, thanks.
Speaker 6
What can and should the city do to protect?
Speaker 3 (Whipple)
I just want to make sure we’re talking about the rights of the LGBTQ community and not just bathrooms on my watch. We’ve been able to pass the strongest non discrimination ordinance in the entire city or entire state of Kansas. We’ve also scored for the first time, and now the second time this year in Wichita’s history, a perfect score of 100 from the Human Rights Campaign when it comes to equality.
Speaker 6
People’s rights.
Speaker 3 (Whipple)
To make sure that Wichita isn’t just a place. For folks who consider themselves in the majority but also a place for everyone because it can’t truly be for all of which, Atta, if you’re not for all of Wichita, so as we move forward, we need to continue to push back and challenge the legislature when they decide to take discriminatory policies to a new level where it threatens the lives of which itens, who I represent. It doesn’t matter who you are. I’m your mayor, and I’m gonna defend you, and I’m gonna defend your rights. My second.
Speaker 2
Miss Blue 30 seconds.
Speaker 4 (Wu)
Non Discrimination ordinance is important, but the way that it was brought forth was divisive and that is what which agents have told me. They’re tired of divisiveness, not just in local politics but at the national level here in Wichita, we can make a difference because we as wichitans. Don’t want to see ourselves as one or the other. We want to see ourselves as wichitans, and reminding ourselves that the track record of this current mayor regarding the LGBTQ community, the way you brought forth that ordinance, created division. And that’s not what.
Speaker 2
Mr. Whipple 30 seconds.
Speaker 3 (Whipple)
My non discrimination ordinance had more support from members of the faith community than members against had the support of the Wichita Chamber of Commerce add support of our largest employers? Ohh, and it’s the right thing to do. Fighting for civil rights might not be the nice thing to do, but it is the right thing to do and I’d rather be the good guy and on the right side of history, even if it’s divisive. If it’s protecting the rights of the people I represent and I’m never going to apologize for that.
Speaker 2
Next question please, from Bonita Gooch of the Community Voice. Mr. Whipple, your first.
Speaker 7
OK, I never heard it either. Your opening statements address environmental concerns in Northeast Wichita, there’s a truck stop that was recently approved that will emit that diesel fuel. Over the concerns of a nearby community, a historic but only recently revealed toxic spill, we have ponds and rivers. We can’t eat the fish from. We have a diminishing tree canopy, lots of illegal dumping and St. trash and uncontrolled use of plastic bags. If elected, what would you prioritize to address to to address local environmental issues?
Speaker 3 (Whipple)
That question since elected, we’re able to create a board that’s dedicated for environmental issues, the sustainability and environment aboard, and we also funded them with $100,000. The startup fund so that they can help us bring not only policy, but also issues and start making those changes. I think it’s incredibly important, particularly when we’re dealing with state level and federal level environmental. Issues that we get that information out on a local level, that still you’re talking about is something that happened I think decades ago and Kathe just wound up sitting on it. The state just sat on it. The last mayor to even talk about this or know about it was Mayor Brewer. So we got to have better relationships when it comes to the state departments so we can get that information out to the community. The other thing we have to do is be smart. While we look ahead when it comes to environmental issues. Right now, the city of Wichita, our public buildings with 98%. Wind energy. We are trading our gas guzzling buses for good battery powered buses, electric buses and we put over $10 million in charging station infrastructure over the last year thanks to a federal grant. So we’re on the right path. I just need a. Second, turn to finish the job.
Speaker 2
Miss will one minute.
Speaker 4 (Wu)
Benita environmental issues, especially in our North End, I’ve been Privy to attend those community meetings and I’ve been listening. I hear the pain that people are suffering from not having the communication from government. That is a lack that not only we need to work on as a local government, but also at all levels. The lack of communication to our residents has created not only division but distrust in local government. And so first and foremost, we need a a mayor that is not just. Informed about the issues of what’s happening in the North End, but also making sure that they continue to listen and be at the table listening to our residents, asking them what their concerns. These are the problem though is when I knock on the doors of our neighbors on the North End, what they tell me they’re most tired about is rising crime, and that is the issue that we need to focus our energy back on. It’s the priorities of local government. Environmental issues have a place, but priorities need to come first.
Speaker 2
Mr. Whipple third.
Speaker 3 (Whipple)
2nd so I mean, as a news reporter, Lily, you could have also done a story about this if we were not on top of getting the information now we lean our media partners to correct us at the city level. We’re missing something as we move forward though, one of the things I’ve been able to do is bring more people to the table by creating boards or creating a task force. Including the the Board on Diversity, Inclusion and civil rights. So we are appointing people who used to be left out of the room now to run these meetings to make sure that we’re not only forward thinking as a community, but we’re inclusive in that forward thinking and plan.
Speaker 4 (Wu)
The individual missing from those listening sessions on our North End is an individual who’s also on the stage with me. I’m listening to this community attending meetings, listening to our residents, really getting a pulse of what you all want. And as I’ve knocked on your doors and I’ve attended community meetings. What you tell me is you want local government to focus back their energy on public safety and growing this economy.
Speaker 2
Next question, coming back to Kylie Cameron from KMW, Lily Wu you. Are up first.
Speaker 5
As the city works towards functional 0 for homelessness in the city, it also continues to sweep homeless encampments and push people who live there to other parts of the city. Is this a policy you support?
Speaker 4 (Wu)
I had the opportunity to go on police ride alongs, including with the homeless outreach team, and I can tell you. It’s a problem that not only requires compassion, but it also requires us to become more collaborative. We cannot just push residents out of our downtown core to other communities like South End, where I grew up, residents tell me that they are tired of seeing people not being treated with compassion. But it’s also because the reason why we are in this position is because we have. Nearly 300 bed shortage in the shelters, so we need to get back to the core reason why we are seeing our homeless or houseless population out there. And we have a current mayor who could be doing something about this, but the problem has simply increased over the last four years, the number of homeless four years ago was just under 600. With that point in time, it was 702 this year. So we need new leadership in City Hall.
Speaker 2
Mr. Whipple one minute.
Speaker 3 (Whipple)
Hey, I’m gonna start off the same time. I never do you like that? I would never say someone on this stage is something wrong. So I’m sorry that happened to. But as we get to functional 0, we gotta actually look at the causes of homelessness and not just work on just managing the problem. However, I will say on my watch we have put more into homelessness and homelessness prevention than the last 20 years combined 20 years combined. Millions upon millions of dollars, thanks to federal federal resources that we’re able to get in. Also, I’m the only mayor in recent memory that puts a quarter $1,000,000 into our shelters every single. People winter to make sure that wichitans aren’t freezing on the streets and we’ve got to continue to work with our partners over United Way. I’m working with them. I’m making sure that we get the function of 0 and I’m the only one who’s running for office, not just on the stage. Who actually has a $9.5 million plan to address functional 0 by leveraging our federal funds and changing our paradigm. We gotta solve the problem, not just manage the problem. It’s not about how many meals did you give out. It’s about how many people did you get house. I need my second term so I can get that done.
Speaker 2
30 seconds. Miss blue.
Speaker 4 (Wu)
Collaboration, not competition, and one of the things that I have not seen at these homeless task force meetings. Is you, mayor? So I would like to say that it’s important to have a leader that wants to collaborate and bring more of our community together. The nonprofit sector, local government, as well as state government to find funding to come down to Wichita, but also our business community because we all can play a role in helping. With those of our neighbors who are facing a houseless situation.
Speaker 2
Mr. Whipple 30 seconds.
Speaker 3 (Whipple)
So I apologize to my opponent, but more than four members of the Council can’t actually be in on a meeting or else would be a violation of our ethics ordinance. So I don’t attend those meetings. I do one-on-one, updates with leaders throughout our city, including the leaders over United Way, including my council members who attend those meetings. Including with leaders who have a stake in the game. And again, my goal is to get to functional 0 instead of insulting me, come up with a plan. Tell me, what is your $9.5 million plan to actually get people off the streets and house cuz all I’m hearing is insults and I’m here to trade ideas.
Speaker 2
Next question please, Diane Leffler of The Wichita Eagle. Mr. Whipple, you’re up first.
Speaker 6
City Hall talks constantly about the need to attract and retain young people in Wichita, but the rising price of housing has made it increasingly difficult for them to stay and put down roots here. Meanwhile, the city spends millions subsidizing development of expensive luxury apartments. To put upward pressure on the housing market. Do you believe city policy is meeting its stated goal of attracting and retaining young adult? Or does it need to be changed and if so?
Speaker 3 (Whipple)
How so? We are attracting more young adults than we have at any point in our city’s history because we now have a medical school downtown and we also are developing a Medical Center with WSU and with KU, which is gonna bring in even more people from around the country into our core. So we have to continue the progress when it comes to building apartments and building. Housing, but also that housing has to be affordable. We’re about 20 to 40,000 units shy right now and because developers have run City Hall for so long, the majority of the incentives actually go to only 30% of the market, which are single family homes. So instead we have to emphasize. And incentivize infill and we have to incentivize multi unit homes in our core, so long as they match the character of the neighborhood and by throwing supply at it, simple supply and demand economics by throwing supply at it, we’re going to be able to actually get the cost down. It’s been done in other cities. It’s gonna be done in. Wichita in my second term.
Speaker 2
Miss one minute.
Speaker 4 (Wu)
That’s actually something I agree with you, mayor. This is a supply issue. In order to have more affordable housing, we must have more housing. In general, we need to have housing that is affordable at all levels and accessible. Unfortunately, though, right now we face about a 19,000 unit shortage of rental properties so that folks can have accessible and rentable. Properties. So in order to attract young people to stay in Wichita, we do need to focus on. But we need to focus it more responsibly. And you’re right, developers have a role to play. Developers build, they build restaurants, they build homes. So we need them at the table. But we need to hold them accountable if we are going to be in partnership with them. Developers and anyone who. Receives incentives from the city of Wichita must be able to be transparent in the process of getting that bid. Must hold the developer accountable and must be able to show a great return on investment on taxpayer dollars.
Speaker 2
Mr. Whipple 30 seconds.
Speaker 3 (Whipple)
Yeah, we got the more supply at it. We’re able to shift our baseball stadium deal to make sure that it has apartments and not just office spaces. I agree. When it comes to transparency, I’m the one who actually holds developers accountable. We’re actually suing people to get our taxpayer money back. Who thought they could rip off the city with impunity? That doesn’t happen on my watch, and we’re gonna make sure we continue that practice.
Speaker 2
Miss Whipple, 30, Miss Wu. 30 seconds. Excuse me.
Speaker 4 (Wu)
Mayor again, as a young person myself who chose to stay in Wichita, I chose this community because I believe that there are opportunities in economic ones for all, but we need to share those opportunities with more of our Community. They need to be aware of those. Opportunities not just in jobs but also in housing. And we need as a mayor be the ambassador of this community to share and connect the dots for people because we need to retain our young people, but we also need to grow our economy.
Speaker 2
Real quickly, someone seems to be keeping time on their phone. Here we have time keepers here, so if you can turn your phones off, that would be great. And another question now from Bonita Gooch of the Community Voice. Miss Wu, you’re up first.
Speaker 7
Now, Miss Woo, you’ve told me that public safety is your #1 issue. And while some people support flooding, law enforcement with more and more funding, there’s another theory that looks at funding prevention programs as a way to reduce crime, with the result less need for enforcing. Do you support funding prevention programs as a way to reduce crime in Wichita? And if you do, what ideas do you have on how this type of programming could be funded and implemented?
Speaker 4 (Wu)
Prevention programs are critical. We need our officers also be to be part of that solution in terms of prevention prevention programs like the juvenile. Intervention unit over at USD259, the future ready advocates who are helping with reduction in crime in young people getting into crime. These are aspects that we need to focus our energy on. But the current Police Department is facing 100 police officer shortage and 100 more officers who are eligible for retirement when we can’t have police officers working focused on community policing, what they’re doing is just entering emergency calls and that does not breed. Proactive preventative measures, so we need to fix public safety and that begins at the Police Department level. And I will say that there is one way to help with reduction of crime in general and that is we all together must work towards making sure that Wichita is a place that we all hold ourselves accountable and our young people accountable for.
Speaker 2
Mr. Whipple one minute.
Speaker 3 (Whipple)
All right. Thank you for the question. We’ve actually invested more in public safety than in at any point in our city’s history, but that’s not just going to more officers, although we are trying to transfer in the best and the brightest and we’re trying to create more policy to get more officers. Again, however, we have to make investments in our youth programs and also our mental health programs. One of the things that we just saw about a week ago is a mental health crisis with a person with a gun who was threatening self harm and what happened was our officers were able to make a tactical retreat and bring in our mental health professionals to negotiate with this person and actually. Help them, and in doing that the situation was able to close without. Bloodshed. Now we don’t have to parachute into communities or even get our cops to do it. There are people doing incredible work in our communities and that’s why we put aside money in our violence interrupter programs to identify those people who is working with our youth right now. Who’s actually out there? Have the experience in what we call the social equity to make a positive change. And how can a city come alongside them? And be helpful to them. Is it money? Is it resources? Is it an office at one of our neighbors associations? What can we do to partner with them? And that’s something.
Speaker 2
We’re exploring Miss Wu 30 seconds.
Speaker 4 (Wu)
Funny you mentioned relational capital, because that is the very first thing that the Wichita Police Department will. Need they need a new leader? Who actually will help bridge not just the mayor’s office, but the Police Department and our community. When you lack the respect and the resources from the mayor’s office, you will not be able to retain and attract more officers. And we need trained officers. We also need officers that focus on prevention, but when we have a shortage in officers, they can’t focus on those efforts and that’s what we need to.
Speaker 2
Mr. Whipple 30 seconds.
Speaker 3 (Whipple)
Look, I’m in constant contact with our police chief. I’m a constant contact with leadership team. I’m the mayor that provided them over $30 million. I voted every single way that the FOP has asked us to vote when it comes to modernization and their contracts. And I’ll tell you, our officers are tough. No one goes to work wondering if I like them. OK, officers go to work because they have a calling, a calling to keep our cities safe. And the idea that, oh, it’s about relationships. No, it’s about resources. It’s about. What is it that I could do to help you be a better officer and help you be a best police force and right now. We’re on a path to that.
Speaker 2
Next question, another round of questions, starting again with Kylie Cameron of KMW. Mr. Whipple, you are up first.
Speaker 5
The city of Wichita recently resold land near the ballpark for a dollar an acre. It’s also engaged in several public private partnerships in that area and downtown. What can be done to ensure that taxpayers don’t have to bear the burden if these deals don’t meet their benchmarks?
Speaker 3 (Whipple)
Yeah, I’ll tell you part of my job is to utilize my legislative experience and my formal education to go back and fix the problems of the past. Sadly, the previous mayor and administration didn’t tie those development parcels to the actual owner of the baseball team. If that baseball team was to be sold and instead tied it to the owner of the team, even after that team was sold. Which means we had a guy living out of state sitting on those parcels in that development. Holding them hostage. Luckily, the team was able to navigate, so we got those back onto the table so that we can get that developed because if we don’t, that goes bankrupt and it’s not about where I believe, you know, if I’m in support or non support, if something when I get into office, my job is to fix it and there is nothing that would have been worse. Through our economy, when it comes that $80 million stadium then not having to pay its own bills to the STAR Bond project, we had to get that moving again. Glad we’re able to get that moving again. But again, it’s because the contract is pretty shoddy and likely I was able to utilize my legislative experience, go in and cut a deal that saved that ballpark.
Speaker 4 (Wu)
It’s it’s that same legislative experience that you’ve had for four years that you did not work on until we were pushed up against the wall. I always say that it’s important to engage our community at a point when before you’re pushed against the wall, you should ask our community. What should have happened with that parcel being sold at a dollar an acre? We should have asked our Community what are. Other individuals, organizations or just entities that might want to help with fixing the problem. You’ve had those four years and knew that this problem was lingering, yet did nothing until you were pushed against the wall, and then you made a decision with the Council. So it is important that we. Remind ourselves that over the last four years, the focus has been on public safety and that has not been your priority.
Speaker 2
Mr. Whipple 30 seconds.
Speaker 3 (Whipple)
Alright, gotta try to explain star bonds in 30 seconds. You have to get approval at the state level. You gotta get approval at the local level. You have to get at least two to three different economic studies to validate it, and then you have to actually get it moving. Your suggestion you can’t legally do. You can’t go back to the drawing board unless you have state approval and you start the process. All over again, and the fact that you think that, I think means that you need to learn a little more about this before one thing. You become mayor or two things. You you, you start discrediting the entirety of the City Council who works so hard to save baseball. We can’t afford an $80 million. Deficit, especially when we can save it and I’m not going to be lectured about public safety by someone who wants to crash our economic development project down there costs an $80 million that could go into our.
Speaker 2
Police Miss Wu 30 seconds.
Speaker 4 (Wu)
There are needs in there once in our community wants to feel safe and that is why. I refocus our efforts on what is important and that is what local governments should be doing. They should be prioritizing what the local government should be focusing on, and those are public safety issues. A baseball stadium is great. I love attending and seeing the community activated, but we need to prioritize the things that really move our community forward with economic development and safety, and that is making sure that we can truly ensure public safety for all around Wichita.
Speaker 2
Next question, Diane Leffler of the Eagle’s Miss Wu, you’re up first.
Speaker 6
City Hall has dedicated itself in recent years to what is called a road diet, essentially reducing 4 lane streets to two lane streets with a center turn lane, including major thoroughfares like McLean and North Broadway. Do you support continuing this policy of reducing traffic lanes for cars? Why or why?
Speaker 4 (Wu)
I’m really glad you said that because over the weekend I had the opportunity to travel across especially our downtown core and making sure that it is not just safe to walk across the street when we push the crosswalk sign, but making sure that people are also active in our community when we have things like Park run. The exploration place when we have things that really activate the downtown core, we need to be mindful that traffic needs to be something that we need to reduce in those areas where we do see increases in traffic. Another thing that I was really excited about was just two weeks ago when Open Streets ICT was around, seeing more people activated and being part of a community are important. So we need to continue thinking smart from reducing those lanes from 4:00 to 2:00 and making sure that we activate the community though and asking them is this the best decision moving forward? So I believe that it’s important to really engage you all, making sure that we’re listening to you and then moving forward with the decisions that City Hall makes.
Speaker 2
Mr. Whipple one minute.
Speaker 3 (Whipple)
Did you say one minute? One minute. All right. So when it makes sense. So if we’re going to do a road diet to increase safety for pedestrians and also for bike lanes, it makes sense in areas that we know we’re gonna have more growth, such as our downtown knowing that we’re gonna bring more students there. 80% of the folks who are attending the Med school. Usually live downtown, so in areas like that it makes sense. In other areas like West Street where we’re widening those streets, that’s because in the industrial areas we’re learning by talking to those businesses by bringing people to the. Table that they need large turning lanes for their trucks, so you’ll see us widen it in certain areas and then skinning them down in other areas. Again, we don’t just randomly do this. We work with our team to make sure that if we’re gonna make any changes, it has to make sense, cuz no one wants to be on the receiving end of a die on Lefler. Opinion piece. If we don’t cross our T’s and dot our eyes. So trust me, Diane, we’re trying to make it make sense and. We can explain it.
Speaker 2
Miss Wu, 30 seconds.
Speaker 4 (Wu)
I think that one of the things that we don’t share enough about is how do we attract young people and young people want to see a walkable city. They want to see a city that makes sense. And when we communicate with our community while we’re doing certain things that breeds better communication with young people and just residents in general. And that’s not something that this current leadership has done. We need to continue, really engaging the community, but not just engage. You all communicating why certain processes happen if there are community engagement processes. Most of our community needs to know that they exist when they only happen in One Direction. Just communication being thrown at you versus coming in. Also with two way communication then then the. Community believes that there’s no trust and we need to get back to that. We need to get back to trusting local government so communication has to be the key.
Speaker 2
Mr. Whipple 30 seconds.
Speaker 3 (Whipple)
I mean, it’s not just communication, it’s relationships. Frankly, it’s the benefit of the doubt. If you’re doing this job well and you’re not just there when you’re campaigning, but you’re actually there to listen and to build relationships. If someone is concerned about something, they’ll come to you and they look to the other side of it and that’s the gold standard when it comes to elections. It’s not just being likable, it’s actually. Getting that benefit of the doubt where folks can say, well, what are you doing over here and why? And give us an opportunity to say, well, This is why and this is what we’re doing and that’s how I do policy right now. Our budget, for example, it had more public input this year than any time in our city’s history to make sure we’re hitting on those priorities. And the last time we broke a record was last year, next year gonna break the record again.
Speaker 2
The next question from Bonita Gooch of the Community Voice. Mr. Whipple, you’re up.
Speaker 7
First, let’s do it. OK, there are a lot of boarded and abandoned houses in Wichita. That are attracting criminals, drug addicts and the houseless. Do you have any idea of how to address this problem with abandoned and boarded up houses? But what happens? Also, considering that I know you’re tearing a lot of them down, which creates another problem. Empty lots, weeds and dumping. Considering we have an affordable housing shortage, just want to throw that in there, do you have any creative ideas to address our problem with boarded up and abandoned housing?
Speaker 3 (Whipple)
You’re hitting on the head. It’s a complex issue. One of the things that the Council does is we do everything we can to save a House. We bring people in and we ask them what you need. And at some point, even Maggie Ballard, Council member, was able to get folks connected with donated lumber and to get those houses. Back in shape, the ones that can’t be saved when you got, as you mentioned, they become a public safety issue once if they have to get demolished. If we can’t turn them over a nonprofit, the city now has a land bank where if we were to get that parcel or if we’re gonna get that house, we can turn it over to Habitat for Humanity or to our nonprofit sector. I think that’s gonna be a key in. This as well and also we don’t want the houses to get that way. I have a plan to work with our neighbor associations and to utilize grant funds so that they can help us target neighbors, particularly elderly folks who actually can’t do the work on their own. But we want to keep them in the neighborhood. Can we get some money to the neighbor associations so they can get the volunteers and actually get those houses worked on and keep those? House is up to par so mom and Dad can stay where they live. I think that’s gonna. Be important too. As we move forward, Miss will one minute.
Speaker 4 (Wu)
Benita, one of the things that I have been really grateful for these last few months is listening to more community members, including those that are Realtors that are auctioneers that are also facing homelessness and also just not accessible to the housing that they need. And what they’re telling me is that we need to see it more broadly. And as I mentioned earlier, we said that housing is a supply issue. We don’t have enough housing. And when you have housing that could be repaired or another developer can think about how to reimagine the space. You still need the community. Engagement. And so someone who wants to engage more of the community would want to have Habitat for Humanity at the table asking them what are your proposed solutions? Because local government may not have all the answers and they shouldn’t. That’s why we rely on others who are experts. And I ask whenever there are. Issues in our Community, not just talk about the problem, but also ask where those solutions are and places like Habitat for Humanity are one of those places to ask.
Speaker 2
So Whipple 30 seconds.
Speaker 3 (Whipple)
So the job of the mayor is also to support our City Council members when it comes to collecting that information from the public. Our district advisory boards usually do that at the Council level. My job is to support the Council member and to work with them through these issues. So I don’t think we need to recreate anything that’s already created. But I think that when it comes to inflation and it comes to property. Work with the nonprofits and actually attacking the supply side of. It’s gonna get that inflation and that costs low and also even building some of the more luxury apartments that actually frees up some of the lower end stuff. For example, my wife and I, we had a little two-bedroom house. Now we have a basically a blouse for our kid. But that two-bedroom house is still there, and now it’s being used by family members. So I think it’s very important that we add supply and we don’t give up on these houses. And if we do, we get another house.
Speaker 2
Back on that lot, this will 30 seconds.
Speaker 4 (Wu)
Since you’re bringing up inflation, that is something that our communities are all facing working class families are facing. Increasing and increases of costs, whether it’s increasing. Taxes that they have seen over the last four. Years or just? Increasing utility prices and that is something that can be corrected. I have run on a campaign that opposes tax increases because I know from working class families that that is not something that they want to see. And so we need to fix the housing issue. But in order to do that also we need to be mindful that working class families, what they’re asking for is stop increasing our prices.
Speaker 2
Next question from coming back to Kylie Cameron of KMW. Lily Wu, you’re up first on this question.
Speaker 5
Wichita Transit continues to operate on limited hours and limited routes. Should the city look at revamping its transit services to make them more accommodating for residents.
Speaker 4 (Wu)
Absolutely, Kylie. I had the opportunity to speak with leadership across the street at Cedric County and I believe that this is not just the Cedric County, but it’s an issue that is more regional and we need to think of transit in a regional way. We need to engage the workforce, the industry, asking them how can we better serve you in getting workers to your companies when we have a transit bus that only stops at the city limit and people can’t get to places like Textron Aviation, we have an issue. So we need to engage our employers. As well, to be part of this solution, but I believe that it requires a regional approach and also a collaborative approach, and that requires someone that can work well. Between City of Wichita, Sedgwick County and our partners, I’ve had the opportunity to be at the Sedgwick County Association of Cities, where, as just a Community member, I attend because it’s important that we all see ourselves as part of the region, not just Wichita.
Speaker 2
Mr. Whipple one minute.
Speaker 3 (Whipple)
So the city of Wichita is the only entity that actually runs the Wichita public transportation. But you’re right, there is a way when it comes to a regional strategy moving forward. Right now our issue is really bus drivers is we don’t have enough bus drive. And I think that there’s a play if we’re smart, where we could actually tap into folks who are driving for Wichita public schools, folks who are driving for WSU. Is there a way in which we can pull in some of these resources and have a more regional transit plan so that you might be driving a school bus in a day, but then a night you’re driving? One of our buses, and if we could bring more and also. A lot of people don’t know this. We actually train our own CDL license our own bus drivers. So if folks are interested in getting a CDL for free, you can do so by signing up to be a part of our team at the City of Wichita and get that credential. I think also part of that is putting that credentialing process into some of our neighbors. Neighborhood buildings, so people who are looking to pivot in this economy could earn that credential and actually pivot into working for the city or working somewhere else with their commercial driver’s license.
Speaker 2
Miss Wu, 30 seconds.
Speaker 4 (Wu)
We have a talent shortage, whether it’s in our Police Department or other areas around our. Community. That’s why we need a mayor who can serve as an ambassador to attract not only talent into our community, but also investment. You need someone who you’re proud of, making sure that that person is a collaborator working with Sedgwick County with our lawmakers, working with nonprofits and our community, we need someone that really. Advocates for the city of Wichita as someone who you cannot be proud of by being someone that can be at the table and collaborate instead of compete.
Speaker 2
Mr. Whipple 30 seconds.
Speaker 3 (Whipple)
Alright, so back to the question. The other thing that which doesn’t have the other cities do is we don’t have a designated tax source that goes right into our public transportation system. It’s actually a general fund allocation. So every other city that’s doing this better, they’ve been able to pretty much mark a percentage. Of gas tax or street tax into their public transit systems so they can make these revisions and keep that, that process moving forward. And I think there’s a great opportunity for us to get there if we have someone in the office who actually knows how to navigate tax policy.
Speaker 2
Next question, Mr. Leffler from The Wichita Eagle. Brandon, you are first.
Speaker 3 (Whipple)
Give it to me down.
Speaker
OK.
Speaker 6
The city has replaced parking meters around our downtown attractions with a privatized smartphone based system, that is. More expensive and for many people far more difficult to use. Do you support this system and why or why?
Speaker 3 (Whipple)
Not man, we’re just getting nailed by downs. Diane’s top issues, so there’s no right answer for this. For me, the actually the right answer is we need a blended approach. We have to modernize our public parking because frankly our meters people don’t have coins anymore. They’re not carrying A roll of quarters around with them. And most of the time people will park, take the risk. The big ticket. And then they’re mad at me because the city ticketed them. I think as we move forward, though, we can embrace technology with the app services while also having a kiosk where people can pay using cash or credit and also utilizing still some of the older techno. There’s nothing wrong with it, so I think as we move forward, we can see some more strategic turnover with the new technology. But also I get it. That’s what I get chewed on for folks who have been doing it the same way for years and now they’re doing it some other way and I’ll just fix it. All right. So if I get my second term, I’ll make sure you guys get the. Meters you need as we also transition over to some of the more technical modern approaches.
Speaker 2
Miss one minute.
Speaker 4 (Wu)
As a Community member who attended the ICT Summit just last week and we talked about the issue of parking, we do have to think smart, but we also have to remind ourselves that in our Community, just as I mentioned earlier, we have to think a little bit differently and walking in our Community needs to be something that we need to start getting used to it. It’s good to walk and when we think about parking in the downtown core, there are places to park. Maybe not as convenient as others would like, but when you think of a big city and a growing city like ours. Parking lots make up real estate that could be used for those grocery stores that people keep talking about, so we need to think about parking in a smart and effective way, but also think about different ways to approach parking and walking because I believe that wichitans want to be part of a growing. City and that requires us to think like a bigger city, and that is sometimes parking that might be just a little bit further away.
Speaker 2
Mr. Whipple 30 seconds.
Speaker 3 (Whipple)
Well, The thing is, not everyone has the luxury of walking. The people who I hear the most push back from when it comes to changing these plans or older folks, folks who like to go to the shows at century too, and they are hesitant to put their information into credit card into a cell phone cuz they’re the targets of scams. So I think just telling people, hey, we gotta walk more. I wanna walk more. I wanna look better. I wanna get my steps in. Don’t get me wrong, but not everyone I talk to in Wichita has that luxury. So what can we do to also accommodate them? And I think it’s not too much to ask to keep a lot with the older technology going as we transition over. And also in Wichita, if you mess with people’s parking to get pretty upset, so you gotta make sure you gotta make sure. That you got a plan for that.
Speaker 2
Miss move 30 seconds.
Speaker 4 (Wu)
Accommodating those who cannot walk, who have wheelchair that need wheelchair access is important, and I believe that when when we had this new parking option in downtown Wichita, it needed to be communicated to our, to our Community. Be better, and that is something that I always say as the city government, we need to communicate with our community, not just passively, but really out there. So you understand not only how the process works and how your information will be protected with these programs. And so I believe that it requires someone in elected office. That also communicates the benefits and the costs of these new technologies.
Speaker 2
We will now move to closing statements here 2 minutes for each candidate. Lily Wu will go first.
Speaker 4 (Wu)
Well, thank you again, Tom and Kylie, Benita and Diane. Four years ago, we were promised change and leadership did not deliver. Wichita deserves better. A better leader and a better ambassador for our community. A leader you can be proud of. I’ve been traveling across Wichita asking are you satisfied with local government and I don’t get many hands raised. Crime is rising, costs are increasing, career politicians continue to deteriorate. Our trust in local government. People are disappointed. They also feel less safe. They’re tired of partisan bickering and unethical behavior. Career politicians who got us into this mess are not the ones who will get us out of it. I’ve been listening to you and I hear you. We want change, new leadership. And a fresh perspective. My vision is rooted in ensuring public safety, growing our economy, restoring trust in City Hall and building a united community. I will work with anyone who wants to improve our city, make our community better, find common ground and make Wichita proud. I’m a political outsider who wants to serve the city she has called home for 30 years. I want. This city to be a better place to live, work and raise a family. I’m Lily Wu and I hope to earn your vote on November 7th.
Speaker 2
Mr. Mr. Mr. Whipple. 2 minutes please.
Speaker 3 (Whipple)
Alright, over the last hour I’ve really enjoyed answering your questions and sharing our ideas for the next four years here in Wichita, but these are not just our ideas. These are our values and our values are that no one in Wichita who gives their time and talents to build our city and economy should live in poverty. Should live paycheck to paycheck or should have to worry if they can afford school supplies or new sneakers for their kids at the start of the school year. And I’m proud to call Wichita home to 1st class Apprenticeships and educational opportunities. Brave entrepreneurs, strong unions and hard working folks who have elevated our city to its current status as again leading the state of Kansas and economic opportunity and growth. Because of you, Wichita remains the best place to live. Work and raise a family, and while I’m encouraged by our accomplishments over the last four years, our work is not finish. In our own city, the city you built, the power of the working class is being threatened by my opponent. She is the handpicked candidate of the same insiders who want to use City Hall as a slush fund to expand profits at the cost of services and investments that we all benefit from. Never before in our city’s history of these political insiders. And dark money machines came together and throw so much against the sitting mayor. And while I’m flattered to those insiders and to all who want to claw back the progress that we’ve achieved for the working families, I simply say bring it. On because what we do today, what we do today and the decisions we make over the next four years will determine the directory of our city over the next three decades. And when my kids are my age or our age 30 years from now, I want them to look back on this moment and say that we delivered for them. That we actually made the decisions and we made the hard calls to make sure that they had a life here in Wichita that is worthy of them to inherit, that they can get a piece of the American dream right here in our city and don’t have to climb an airplane and ride off to some coast. With that, I want to thank the Eagle. I want to thank the boys. I want to thank UW. Tom Shine, thank you. And also can we give up for Chelsea, my wife, I want to thank her for putting up with me. While I do this stuff. Thank you, Chelsea. A round of applause for the candidates, please.
Speaker 1
So thank you once again to our partners, Wichita Eagle Community Boys, Wichita Journalism Collaborative. Thank you to Roxies for providing this great videos. So and here are some upcoming dates to remember October 17th. That is the last day to register to vote. October 23rd. That’s when in person. Advanced voting begins November 2nd. That’s when in person, satellite voting begins and November 7th Election Day. Again, tonight’s debate will be posted later this week on kmw.org, and thank you so much for coming.
Wichita needs transparency from its agencies
When the Wichita city council delegates spending to outside agencies such as Visit Wichita, it should insist on the same transparency requirements the city itself faces.
The Kansas Open Records Act is designed to give citizens access to data concerning their government. In the words of the Kansas Attorney General, “An open and transparent government is essential to the democratic process.”
The preamble to the Kansas act states, “It is declared to be the public policy of the state that public records shall be open for inspection by any person unless otherwise provided by this act, and this act shall be liberally construed and applied to promote such policy.” (emphasis added)
That isn’t always the case in Wichita. Here, the city has formed several non-profit organizations that are funded in large part by tax revenue. But these organizations believe they are not covered by KORA, and so far the city agrees with that.
An example is Visit Wichita, the city’s convention and visitors bureau. This week the Wichita City Council will consider the scope of services and budget for the money the agency receives from Wichita’s Tourism Business Improvement District. This is a tax of 2.75 percent that is added to hotel bills in the city. From 2016 to 2018 this tax brought in an average of just over three million dollars per year.
If the city itself was spending these funds, there is no doubt that the spending records would be public. But Visit Wichita wants to spend this money in secret. It also wants to enter into contracts in secret.
In the Kansas law, here is the definition of a public agency: “‘Public agency’ means the state or any political or taxing subdivision of the state or any office, agency or instrumentality thereof, or any other entity receiving or expending and supported in whole or in part by the public funds appropriated by the state or by public funds of any political or taxing subdivision of the state.” There is an exception, which doesn’t apply here: “‘Public agency’ shall not include: … Any entity solely by reason of payment from public funds for property, goods or services of such entity.”
As can be seen in the nearby table, Visit Wichita gets around 93 percent of its funds from taxes. Surely this qualifies as “supported in whole or in part by the public funds.”
In the past, agencies have objected to the release of records on the basis that they would reveal information or strategies that would benefit Wichita’s competitors for jobs, conventions, and tourists. But the requests I have made (and which were rejected) asked for past data, not contemporaneous data. Further, if Wichita was successful in attracting jobs, conventions, and tourists, this might make some sense. But Wichita lags in these categories, which means that oversight is important. For example, among large hotel markets in Kansas, Wichita is near the bottom in growth.
The records that Visit Wichita needs to disclose are its spending records, which means the checks it has written and credit card charges made. It also needs to disclose its contracts. This is the law, and it is also good public policy.
When my records requests were rejected, I asked the Sedgwick County District Attorney to enforce the law. The DA sided with Visit Wichita (then known as Go Wichita) and the city’s other non-profit agencies, concluding that they were not “public agencies.”
That determination simply meant that Visit Wichita could not be forced to reveal records. But it does not prohibit the agency from supplying records — if it wanted.
This issue is important so that people can trust their government. But leadership in Wichita has not agreed. Now, as Wichita considers large public investments in facilities like a convention center — something desired by Visit Wichita — we need transparency, not secrecy.
Wichita Mayor Brandon Whipple campaigned on greater government transparency. An amendment to the city’s recommended action could require that Visit Wichita recognize itself for what it is — a public agency as defined in the Kansas Open Records Act. Proposing a motion to include this requirement would allow the mayor to fulfill a campaign promise, and it would let Wichitans know where council members stand on this issue.
For more information, see Open Records in Kansas.
Should Wichita have a deputy to the mayor?
A proposal to hire a deputy or chief of staff to the Wichita mayor is a good idea which will increase transparency and accountability of elected officials.
Tomorrow the Wichita City Council will consider a proposal to create the position of Deputy to the Mayor. I’ve excerpted the relevant portion of the agenda packet in pdf form, available here. I include partions below.
How could a deputy or chief of staff help improve the city? As an example, at the April 14 council meeting, approval of a loan for a portion of the new water treatment was on the agenda. This was no surprise; borrowing the money had been planned for a long time. The agenda packet noted the loan amount of $280 million, which was no surprise. But the document mentioned this caveat: “capitalized interest excluded.”
It’s no surprise that loans carry interest charges, but shouldn’t we wonder how much interest? Documents in the agenda packet provided an estimate, as the council passed an ordinance authorizing the issuance of a bond to the government of up to $331 million, meaning the capitalized interest is likely to be around $50 million.
But you had to read a lot of material to come across this figure. It was not obvious. Sources tell me that this figure was not mentioned during the agenda review meeting, and it was not mentioned by city staff during the presentation at the council meeting. It was only when the mayor asked a question that the number was discussed. (The mayor mentioned that a constituent had asked him about it. That was me.) For more on this, see Wichita water plant financing on agenda.
Another example: Recently the council was asked to pass an economic development incentive. The reported benefit-cost ratio did not meet the city’s established standard. There are exceptions that the city can invoke to override the standards, and the council did that. But the agenda packet did not mention that an exception would be required, although it was discussed during the meeting. See Wichita to consider tax forgiveness outside policy parameters.
As another example, the council recently approved a profit-sharing agreement for Naftzger Park event management that contains ambiguity that could lead to disputes. Under certain conditions, depending on how and when the same calculation is performed, the event manager’s share of profits could be $0, or $25,000, or $49,999. The city could either lose $25,000 or $0. While these examples are contrived and use extreme values, they illustrate that the agreement the council passed is ambiguous. No one noticed, or if they did, they didn’t speak up, at least not publicly. See Naftzger Park event management agreement ambiguous.
These are a few examples from this year where city staff has not served the council — and the public — very well. And these are just examples that I know of. We remember last summer when the former mayor was upset with major items being placed on the agenda by management with little or no notice.
Whether the mayor should have a deputy like this depends on what type of relationship we want between the mayor, council, and city management. Currently, and in the past, it seems like the council and mayor operate passively, merely reacting to matters that management brings to them. “Rubberstamp” is a term often used to describe council action. Praise for management and staff is often, in my opinion, uncritically offered and unjustified.
We need some tension, a little bit of check on the power of the city manager and city staff. We need someone to independently conduct research and advise the mayor and council so that the mayor doesn’t have to, as did Mayor Longwell last year, admit on television that he didn’t know the city’s population has declined.
Additionally, having an independent resource who is responsible primarily to the mayor will increase the accountability of the mayor to voters. It will be less credible for the mayor to slough off responsibility to the city manager and staff.
The proposal
The relevant portion of the agenda packet in pdf form is available here. Excerpts follow.
In introducing the proposal, the document states:
This unprecedented time of crisis both economically and in public health requires professional assistance within the Mayor’s office to better serve the community, interface with city department heads and align with Council Members on shared objectives.
This position brings the office of Wichita Mayor to a similar professional standing of every other mayor in comparable cities who enjoy the assistance of a Chief of Staff. Wichita is only one of two top 50 cities in which the Mayor does not have a Chief of Staff, or the equivalent.
Public expectation for the position of Mayor has evolved to expect more community outreach, public accessibility and to maintain a presence throughout the city. This position gives the mayor the resources necessary to provide a similar level of public outreach as current Wichita City Council Members enjoy through the use of their full time community outreach employee, resulting in increased accountability and transparency.
Under job description: “The Deputy to the Mayor will assist the Mayor in policy research, community outreach, special projects, communications, and other tasks as directed.”
It is to be non-political: “This is a non-political position that prevents the participation in campaign activities as defined by K.S.A – 25-4143(h). Employee will sign a non-disclosure order (NDA).”
How will the person be hired? “The selection committee will consist of the Mayor and a staff member appointed by the City Manager.”
Wichita to Ghana, again
News of a Sedgwick County Commissioner’s trip to Africa has raised some controversy, and something like this has been tried before.
The Wichita Eagle reported this regarding Sedgwick County Commissioner Lacy Cruse’s visit to the West Africa country Ghana: “She said she focused her efforts on economic opportunities related to aviation and education. She said she talked to Ghana’s minister of aviation about potentially establishing an aviation school and setting up an aviation maintenance shop at the Tamale International Airport in Ghana. She didn’t make any formal deals on behalf of the county or any local companies. She said forming a trade relationship with Ghana isn’t something that can happen overnight.” 1
Something like this has been tried before, and not too long ago. In 2011, Wichita Mayor Carl Brewer and a delegation traveled to Ghana on a trade mission, seeking business opportunities for Wichita companies. The aircraft industry was prominently mentioned.
The host country, however, may have misunderstood the mission of the visitors from Wichita. A news release on the Official Portal of the Government of Ghana published after the visit included this: “[District Chief Executive (DCE) of Lower Manya Krobo District, Mr Isaac Abgo Tetteh] announced that the Mayor has pledged to furnish Nene Sakitey II with an Aircraft for his private use.” 2
I had thought that perhaps this promise of an airplane to the overlord was a case of something being lost or mangled in translation, but then I realized that English is the official language of Ghana.
There was a follow-up visit in 2014. The Wichita Eagle reported the goals of then-Mayor Brewer: “Brewer’s particular interest on the trip is building business relationships overseas that could lead to opportunities for small and midsize aviation businesses in Wichita.” 3
The trips weren’t very successful in stimulating aviation exports. With the exception of 2011, the Census Bureau reports little in the way of aviation-related exports to Ghana. The data includes the entire State of Kansas.
—
Notes- Swaim, Chance. Commissioner Lacey Cruse’s trip to Africa raises concerns from other commissioners. Wichita Eagle, February 9, 2020. Available at https://www.kansas.com/news/politics-government/article239797448.html. ↩
- Government of Ghana Official Portal. Wichita City to Partner Manya Krobo For Development. November 25, 2011. “An unprecedented visit by the Mayor of Wichita City, Kansas State USA, Mr Carl Brewer, his Deputy, Mrs Lavonta Williams and the Council of Elders were welcomed by the overlord of Manya Krobo Traditional Area, Nene Sakitey II at the Palace. At a grand durbar organised in honour of the Mayor and his delegation, the District Chief Executive (DCE) of Lower Manya Krobo District, Mr Isaac Abgo Tetteh, urged the people of Manya Krobo to set an initiative in order to get a push from the Mayor for the realisation of the sister city project by the city of Wichita and the Manya Krobo municipality. Mr Tetteh also announced at the gathering that, the sister city concept is to assist Lower Manya to attain the standard of a city by helping in the direction of education and other infrastructural development. He announced that the Mayor has pledged to furnish Nene Sakitey II with an Aircraft for his private use.” Image available here. ↩
- City Council members plan trip to Africa. Wichita Eagle, September 16, 2014. Available at https://www.kansas.com/news/politics-government/article2127093.html. ↩
Longwell: ‘There is no corruption’
Wichita Mayor Jeff Longwell says there is no corruption involving him, but this is only because of loose and sloppy Kansas and Wichita laws.
In an advertisement in the November 3, 2019 Wichita Eagle, Wichita Mayor Jeff Longwell defended himself against charges of corruption. Referring to a recent investigation by the Sedgwick County District Attorney, the ad states:
In 2018 and 2017, Bennett found I was 100% compliant. In 2016 he found only one instance where I was $21.33 over the annual $500 threshold allowed for “goods and services” received from local companies.
Here’s what the District Attorney found in his investigation:
Given the failure of Kansas Statutes Annotated 75-4301a to define “good or services,” the Mayor explained to an investigator with the Office of the District Attorney that he did not believe a round of golf constituted “goods or services.” He further explained that charitable golf outings where the entire expenditure went to charity (situations where the golf course donated their greens fees to the charity) led him to the conclusion that, because the charity received the entire donation, the golfers (including him) derived no financial benefit. As such, he did not believe it necessary to report these outings on his substantial interest form. 1
This reasoning by Longwell is hairsplitting to the extreme. What’s important is that Longwell accepted gifts from people he later steered a large city contract to. However large or small the gifts, this is wrong.
In his conclusion, the District Attorney wrote:
And while I am confident, having exhaustively researched the issue, that, as an act of entertainment, golf qualifies as “goods or services” under Kansas law, it is also true that Kansas Statutes Annotated 75-4301a, et seq., governing Substantial Interest Form filings, offers little guidance. I am not filing a class B misdemeanor under these facts.
It seems that sloppy Kansas laws are the problem, along with a mayor willing to exploit that weakness.
Does the city have any laws or regulations on this matter? Here’s an excerpt from the Wichita city code as passed in 2008 (full section below):
“[Council members] shall refrain from making decisions involving business associates, customers, clients, friends and competitors.”
We also have statutory language that reads “business associates, customers, clients, friends and competitors.” But the city attorney, in a question involving former mayor Carl Brewer, felt that these terms are not defined, and therefore the mayor and city council members need not be concerned about compliance with this law. 2
Today, city hall ethics, at least in the mayor’s chair, have not improved. It’s reasonable to conclude that people who pay the mayor to play in expensive golf tournaments are his friends. People who pay for dinner for the mayor and his wife and describe it as a social gathering (as the district attorney found) are friends. Or, maybe they just want something from the mayor and see an ersatz social relationship as a means to an end. But as we’ve learned recently, the current city attorney says council members “are left to police themselves on that city law,” according to Wichita Eagle reporting. 3
Is it true, as the mayor’s ad screams in capital letters?
THERE IS NO CORRUPTION LIKE YOU’VE BEEN LED TO BELIEVE
There is none, but only because of sloppy Kansas and Wichita laws. But under any commonsense definition, yes, there is corruption. It is not necessary for an act to be illegal to be corrupt; that it is dishonest or fraudulent conduct is enough.
Should Longwell be re-elected, can we expect reform? I don’t think it’s likely that someone will support laws criminalizing their own past behavior.
Wichita city code
Sec. 2.04.050. — Code of ethics for council members.
Council members occupy positions of public trust. All business transactions of such elected officials dealing in any manner with public funds, either directly or indirectly, must be subject to the scrutiny of public opinion both as to the legality and to the propriety of such transactions. In addition to the matters of pecuniary interest, council members shall refrain from making use of special knowledge or information before it is made available to the general public; shall refrain from making decisions involving business associates, customers, clients, friends and competitors; shall refrain from repeated and continued violation of city council rules; shall refrain from appointing immediate family members, business associates, clients or employees to municipal boards and commissions; shall refrain from influencing the employment of municipal employees; shall refrain from requesting the fixing of traffic tickets and all other municipal code citations; shall refrain from seeking the employment of immediate family members in any municipal operation; shall refrain from using their influence as members of the governing body in attempts to secure contracts, zoning or other favorable municipal action for friends, customers, clients, immediate family members or business associates; and shall comply with all lawful actions, directives and orders of duly constituted municipal officials as such may be issued in the normal and lawful discharge of the duties of these municipal officials.
Council members shall conduct themselves so as to bring credit upon the city as a whole and so as to set an example of good ethical conduct for all citizens of the community. Council members shall bear in mind at all times their responsibility to the entire electorate, and shall refrain from actions benefiting special groups at the expense of the city as a whole and shall do everything in their power to ensure equal and impartial law enforcement throughout the city at large without respect to race, creed, color or the economic or the social position of individual citizens.
—
Notes- District Attorney Bennett’s findings concerning Mayor Jeff Longwell. Available at https://www.sedgwickcounty.org/media/56094/520-pm-oct-17-mayor-longwell-finaldocx.pdf. ↩
- Weeks, Bob. City code on ethical conduct in Wichita. Available at https://wichitaliberty.org/wichita-government/city-code-on-ethical-conduct-in-wichita/. ↩
- Swaim, Chance. Wichita’s mayor steered multi-million-dollar water plant contract to friends. Wichita Eagle, September 29, 2019. Available at https://www.kansas.com/news/politics-government/article234701932.html. ↩
Questions for Mayor Jeff Longwell
Wichita Mayor Jeff Longwell urges Wichitans to reach out to him with questions through email and social media.
I’ve posed a few questions to Wichita Mayor Jeff Longwell on Facebook, usually tagging both his personal profile and campaign page. But he hasn’t answered any, despite urging citizens to contact him. Here are some recent questions:
October 17
A question for Mayor Jeff Longwell and Mayor Jeff Longwell for Reelection:Mr. Mayor, the city may be looking at several large investments soon, like a convention center or performing arts center. How can you assure us that your influence over these items can’t be bought with a few gifts and eerily flattering emails?
—
October 18
Mayor Jeff Longwell, I have a question regarding the use of cash as an economic development incentive. You’ve said that the city does not, and will not, give cash as an economic development incentive.Here’s a passage from December 2017 regarding the Spirit Aerosystems expansion in Wichita. Specifically, this is from the Memorandum of Understanding for Project Eclipse, Section I.B. It was contained within the agenda packet for Wichita City Council meeting for December 12, 2017.
“The COUNTY participation of $7 million US is anticipated to be available cash; the CITY participation would consist of cash in the amount of $3 million US, forgiveness of $3.5 million US in future COMPANY payments associated with the CAPITAL COMPONENT and an agreement to make additional capital improvements relating to the WATER AGREEMENT in an approximate cost of $1 million US.”
Am I reading this correctly: The city gave Spirit $3 million cash, and forgave a debt of $3.5 million?
Can you tell us how this is different from using cash as an economic development incentive?
—
October 21, 2019
A question for Mayor Jeff Longwell and Mayor Jeff Longwell for Reelection:Where do we go to find the city’s checkbook spending? Posting this elementary and fundamental data is something that almost every governmental jurisdiction mastered years ago.
I ask because you have said you champion transparency, but I can’t find this data on the city’s website.
—
October 22, 2019
A question for Mayor Jeff Longwell and Mayor Jeff Longwell for Reelection:Earlier this month the Center for Economic Development and Business Research at Wichita State University issued this forecast for Wichita:
“For 2020, growth is expected to be more modest, as the Wichita economy is projected to add approximately 1,600 new jobs and grow 0.5 percent.”
Do you agree with this forecast, and if yes, how do we reconcile this with your desire to “keep the momentum going?”
—
October 23, 2019
A question for Mayor Jeff Longwell and Mayor Jeff Longwell for Reelection:Last night during the debate on KAKE, you said, “We have a diversified economy now that’s not just centered on aviation, although aviation is still important to us.”
One way to measure the diversification or concentration of an industry in a local economy is location quotients. These are calculated and provided by the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Since 2014, the concentration of employment in NAICS code 3364, aerospace product and parts manufacturing, hasn’t changed much. Can you tell us the basis of your claim that the Wichita economy is diversifying?
More about this topic is at:
Wichita aerospace manufacturing concentration—
October 30, 2019
A question for Mayor Jeff Longwell and Mayor Jeff Longwell for Reelection:There was unusual interest in Michigan about the Wichita airport contract decision in 2012, and the campaign bank account of Wichita City Council Member Jeff Longwell benefited financially. The Michigan party that was interested in Longwell’s political future was Walbridge, a Michigan-based construction company that partnered with Wichita-based Key Construction to bid for the airport job.
Here’s an abbreviated timeline of events:
July 16, 2012: John Rakolta, Chairman and CEO of Walbridge, and Terry Rakolta contribute $1,000 to Jeff Longwell’s campaign for Sedgwick county commission.
July 17, 2012: Wichita City Council on 5 to 2 vote found Dondlinger Hunt bid to be non-responsive. Key/Walbridge is presumptive contract winner.
July 20, 2012: Other Walbridge executives contribute $2,250 to Jeff Longwell’s campaign.
Walbridge made no other political contributions to city council members.
Mayor Longwell, do you think it is proper to accept campaign contributions that are so closely linked to a decision you made?
Checking a Jeff Longwell for Mayor political ad
An ad from the Jeff Longwell for Mayor Committee contains a false claim.
An advertisement advocating the re-election of Wichita Mayor Jeff Longwell contains a claim about economic development that is false.
The ad appears in the October 20, 2019 print edition of the Wichita Eagle. Under the heading “Let’s Set the Record Straight,” we find this item: “Multiple large scale business development projects like the Cargill Downtown Headquarters which created 850+ jobs.”
It’s the use of the word “create” that is false. It’s wrong because Cargill’s headquarters was located in downtown Wichita at the time it announced it would build a new headquarters in another part of downtown Wichita. 1 Whatever the number of jobs, they merely moved from North Main Street to East Douglas Avenue in the same zip code. 2
It’s possible that if Cargill’s threat to build a new headquarters in another city was genuine, we could say the city and state “retained” these jobs. But using the word “create” to describe these jobs is false. Regarding the retention of these Cargill jobs, voters can decide whether the cost was worthwhile.
Regarding the cost of retaining Cargill jobs, since Mayor Longwell raised the topic, here is a list of the known subsidies and incentives the city offered to retain the Cargill jobs. 3 As summarized in the agenda packet:
“In exchange for Cargill’s commitment, the City has negotiated the following:
- Issue Industrial Revenue Bonds (Letter of Intent approved April 18, 2017) 100% property tax abatement; 5+5 year basis
- Sales tax exemption
- Acquisition of a 15 year parking easement for public access to the garage in the evenings and on weekends (estimated cost of $6,500,000)
- Expedited plan review (50% reduction in time)
- Reduced permitting fees (50%) (estimated savings of $85,000)
- Assign a project manager/ombudsman for a single point of contact for the company”
The Wichita Eagle reported the value of the tax breaks as $13.6 million. 4 More information about these subsidies is here: More Cargill incentives from Wichita detailed.
The agenda packet for the city council meeting doesn’t mention this, but from the state of Kansas Cargill is likely to receive PEAK benefits. Under this program, the Kansas state withholding tax deducted from Cargill employees’ paychecks will be routed back to Cargill. 5 (Not all; only 95 percent.) Some very rough calculations show that PEAK benefits might be worth some $2 million annually to Cargill. 6
—
Notes- Cargill to keep headquarters in Wichita, but new site still unknown. Wichita Eagle. Available at https://www.kansas.com/news/business/article79516092.html. ↩
- Cargill selects site for new Wichita headquarters. Wichita Eagle. Available at https://www.kansas.com/news/business/biz-columns-blogs/carrie-rengers/article105193381.html. ↩
- City of Wichita. Agenda Packet for July 18, 2017. Approval of Development Agreement with Cargill Meat Solutions Corporation. ↩
- Cargill’s job guarantee to city could count 1-day workers as full time. Wichita Eagle. Available at https://www.kansas.com/news/politics-government/article161882968.html. ↩
- Weeks, Bob. In Kansas, PEAK has a leak. http://wichitaliberty.org/kansas-government/kansas-peak-leak/. ↩
- For the first year of the agreement, Cargill is expected to have 750 or more employees at an average salary of $66,814. That annual salary / 26 pay periods = $2,570 biweekly. For a family with two children (this is just a guess and could be way off), there are two withholding allowances, so $2,570 – ($86.54 x 2) = $2,397. Using the new withholding tables for married workers (another assumption), bi-weekly withholding is $48.17 + 5.7% x ($2,397 – $1,298) = $48.17 + $62.64 = $110.81. That means $2,881 annual withholding, so Cargill’s 95% share is $2,737. For 750 employees, this is an annual subsidy to Cargill of $2,052,750. ↩
The Making of the Wichita Mayor 2019
The Making of the Wichita Mayor 2019
By Karl Peterjohn
There are eight major lessons for Wichita voters when they cast their ballots on or before November 5, 2019, concerning the revelations of favoritism involving the mayor, apparently a majority of the city council, and a number of Wichita businesses and businessmen concerning a proposed massive city water plant contract that is close to half a billion dollars.
The Wichita Eagle’s detailed reporting on this proposed contract, Mayor Longwell’s role deserves scrutiny at several different levels.
Let me begin with full disclosure. Both Mayor Longwell and I are registered Republicans, and also GOP precinct committeemen in our respective west Wichita precincts. The mayor is now one of the most prominent Republican mayors in the entire country. In 2012, then-city council member Longwell ran against me in the Republican primary for the Sedgwick County Commission. He lost. Subsequently, in 2015, Jeff Longwell defeated Sam Williams in the non-partisan general election for Wichita mayor.
Finally Exposing Improper City Contract Conduct
The Wichita Eagle deserves credit for researching city records following an expensive KORA records request. The paper also deserves credit for reporting the story about favoritism, cronyism, and how public-private partnerships” actually have been operating as part of the proposed new water plant at city hall.
However, this story implicitly treats this type of conduct as new. In reality, there is an extensive history of similar conduct going back for years at city hall. That raises the question, why now?
News Hole
The huge volume of space the Wichita Eagle initially provided to cover this front page, above the fold story on a Sunday paper is remarkable. It was extremely large. I doubt that the 1969 moon landing, the 9-11-2001 Islamist terrorist attacks, or pick any of the presidential campaign election results since the 1960s had as much space with as many words above the fold on the front page, and followed with two full pages inside the Sunday paper, and editorial commentary as this city hall story. As a percentage of the total news hole in the paper, a higher percentage was probably contained within this edition of the paper.
I believe that you would probably need to go back to the JFK assassination for coverage that may have included more space than this Sunday, September 29, 2019 story received.
This is quite a contrast in local news coverage from past examples of city contracts that were handled in a similar way over many years. Let’s look at why this might have occurred.
Weakened Local News Media
The news organizations in Wichita have been decimated by digitization. The digital world has dramatically changed the environment for print and broadcasting, whether it is radio or TV. All of these organizations are smaller, have reduced staffs, and lack the ability to do extensive and expensive research needed to provide any sort of investigative reporting. That is why the Eagle’s reporting on this story is remarkable since the room for news in this shrunken paper is a small fraction of what it was 10 or even just five years ago.
The Eagle’s reporting is also notable because its parent company, McClatchy Corporation (MCN), is in severe financial distress, with a corporate capital base hovering around $20 million while the firm’s indebtedness is many times larger. Recently, the Eagle announced that it was discontinuing daily publication, and will be printed six times weekly beginning in November.
McClatchy Corporation stock is now under $3 a share despite having a reverse stock-split that dramatically reduced the number of shares (1 for 10) in this financially distressed firm. To raise cash, McClatchy recently sold their Kansas City Star building. The details of this transaction that included a 15-year leaseback, indicate a company suffering severe financial difficulties.
Despite these cash flow problems, the resources needed to write this story were provided. The Wichita broadcast news media is now following, and reporting this story too.
However, this type of reporting could have occurred years ago and wasn’t. Why not?
Vote for the Leftist With A Chance
The very liberal Wichita Eagle editorial page is nothing new. When Knight-Ridder owned the eagle, the paper did an in-your-face endorsement of the liberal Michael Dukakis in the 1988 presidential election to its readers in Republican-voting Kansas.
Now the Eagle knew that their endorsement would not matter. Kansas had not voted for a Democrat for president since 1964, or before that, 1936 when Kansas’ favorite son, Alf Landon, was defeated by FDR. Despite this, they endorsed a Massachusetts leftist who went on to lose in a national landslide, as well as a Kansas landslide in this state. Even if a Republican loses a national election, Kansans overwhelming voted for Bob Dole every time his name appeared on the national election ballot.
State and local newspaper endorsements are different. This is where the Eagle’s endorsements have had more influence in races where voters may not know as much about the candidates. This is more of a factor in primaries where even less is known about candidates and their positions, than in general elections.
Now the Eagle’s defenders will take exception to this claim about liberal endorsements. Eagle defenders will claim that the paper has endorsed some Republicans, and occasionally even a conservative. It is true, this has occasionally occurred but only under a narrow set of circumstances. These non-liberal endorsements only occur when it was clear that the conservative was likely to win, and usually would win big regardless of who or how the paper endorsed. The Eagle’s editorial endorsement policy is usually to endorse the most liberal candidate with a reasonable chance to win, and has been in place for more than 40 years I’ve lived in Wichita.
As the paper’s financial and news resources have weakened, the ability to endorse has diminished with their diminishing circulation but still has substantial influence in low-turnout elections that especially include primaries, and down-ballot races.
Voice for Liberty Records It
The Voice for Liberty website at wichitaliberty.org pictured former Mayor Carl Brewer, a liberal Democrat, holding a big fish while standing next to a prominent local businessman David Wells of Key Construction Company. Next to this picture Weeks included a Brewer letter on city hall letterhead praising Key Construction Company and identifying it as the special construction company with city hall connections.
Bob Weeks and Voice for Liberty did everything possible to call out this situation. Interest in the local news media, from the Wichita Eagle to the broadcasters can be described in one word: crickets. Nada, nothing, ain’t going to go there was the Wichita news media reaction. But there are more city hall purchase contract shenanigans, and it is more recent.
Wichita Eagle Skews
In July 2012 the city council voted to give a large, nine-figure construction contract to a Michigan company with their select Wichita partners to replace the Wichita Airport terminal. The Michigan company and their local partners, including Key Construction, weren’t the low bidders. The lowest bidder was a Wichita construction company.
The Michigan company partnered with Key Construction and won the city council vote on this contract. Then-city council member Jeff Longwell voted to give this large contract to the Michigan/Key construction group.
The day before the city council and Longwell voted the Michigan construction company’s top management and many of their spouses made maximum donations allowed by law to the Longwell for County Commission Campaign. The day after Longwell voted to give them this $100 million-plus contract more maximum legal level donations rolled into the Longwell campaign from the Michigan company’s management and their spouses.
This all became public record when these were reported on campaign finance reports about 10 days before the election. Naturally, my campaign responded to this outrageous misconduct. Interest from the news media in general, and the Wichita Eagle, which had endorsed the less conservative candidate in this race, Longwell, had no interest in reporting on these outrageous events on their front or editorial pages.
My county commission campaign tried to buy a newspaper ad in the Eagle and publicize this outrageous financial misconduct at city hall. The Wichita Eagle’s advertising staff did everything they could to assist my campaign in this ad purchase. However, the rest of the Eagle editorial, management, and news staff attempted to censor my text, and prevent my ad from running in the form it was being used in our other campaign efforts. Eventually, my campaign did run an ad, but without all of the language that we wanted to use, in exposing this financial misconduct on the city’s airport construction contract.
This story did get to some voters, but only because my county commission campaign successfully mailed this information into voters’ hands, although roughly 40 percent of the voters had already cast ballots before my campaign material could be distributed. I beat Councilman Longwell with over 56% of the vote in the August 2012 GOP county commission primary contest.
However, when Sam Williams tried to raise this issue in the 2015 mayor’s race, it was treated as ancient history and not reported. Sadly, this history of cronyism at city hall wasn’t reported prior to the primary, and I believe that this would have made Lyndy Wells advance to the general election ballot. Most recently, this is especially true in the way the city has handled the destruction of Lawrence Dumont Stadium, and the sale of approximately 4 acres for $1 an acre around the stadium for the ownership group of an out of state, minor league baseball club. Special city favors for special people within the public-private partnership paradigm is the way municipal government operates here.
More Wichita Eagle Skews
This wasn’t the only example of city hall financial transgressions and shenanigans. In 2013 the city was involved in the city-owned land sale for the west bank apartment project, the same sort of financial shenanigans occurred. The city went with their politically favored firm, and Jeff Longwell voted with the majority to go his business buddies, in another example of this “public-private partnership.”
Sadly, Mayor Longwell continues to defend the “public-private partnerships” model for city development in this latest example of how Wichita city hall operates. This did not receive Wichita Eagle coverage like the most recent example that occurred with 3 weeks away from advanced voting in the 2019 mayor’s race begins, and roughly 5 weeks before the November 5 election day.
For many Wichitans, “public-private partnerships” is just a politically correct phrase describing cronyism, for ethically conflicted projects, for the special favors for special people environment in Wichita’s city government. Profits are privatized while loses land in taxpayer’s laps. This is what happens without clearly specified bidding, and without procedures for selecting, and protecting the low, winning bidders who meet clear project specifications.
City Purchases and City Scandals
Government scandals aren’t limited to city hall. Purchasing scandals have occurred at all levels of government.
After I joined the Sedgwick County commission in 2009, I was informed about past purchasing scandals in Sedgwick County government. These had all occurred in the last century. This occurred as I began officially reviewing county financial operations. County staff was proud of the protections and safeguards built into the county’s bidding and bid board process.
That is why almost all county bids were handled as routine, often consent agenda items. That’s how the county had created its bid board, and how there was a major effort to protect taxpayers. This transparent process treated all potential bidders fairly, whether they were local, or not; whether they knew or didn’t know county officials; and it was an open, transparent process. The city needs to move to a clear, transparent, and fair model like the county has enjoyed for several decades.
Conclusion With a Warning for the Future
Financial shenanigans have a long history in Wichita city hall. Lack of detailed news coverage of these shenanigans is a hidden story that this non-reporter is going to try and disclose for if nothing else, the historical record now. This is sad that this history has to be provided by a frustrated, non-media, Wichitan who, while I did enjoy an elevated county courthouse observation position for eight years, could only observe these city crony cases from the other side of Central Ave.
Additional details about these crony stories mentioned here are contained in the Voice for Liberty archives. This information is accessible to everyone on this site. Even the news media.
Now, this most recent example of city cronyism has received a large amount of well-deserved, and in fact remarkable, huge coverage by the Wichita Eagle. While I am a major critic of the Eagle, I will state that this paper deserves credit for breaking this story.
This must be placed in the context and contrast with often the lack of interest in the past, especially if the Eagle’s politically favored officials were involved. The major news story is not the continuing cronyism at Wichita city hall but the fact that cronyism was exposed, received major negative news attention, and now continuing news coverage.
Sadly, I expect that the bottom line is that little or nothing to change the public-private cronyism model that is encased in political concrete in city hall. This model also seems to be encased in Wichita media concrete too. Sadly, this defective economic model enhancing cronyism is likely to prevail regardless of who wins in the mayor’s election contest, or the other city council elections, November 5.
Postscript
The cronyism in Wichita and news media flaws that are discussed above are relevant but tiny compared with the egregious corruption nationally in our country. The outrages from the Clinton Crime Foundation, the recent revelations concerning the Biden overseas money schemes, the misuse of government FISA surveillance in the Russian collusion hoax, outline national abuses and governmental scandals that far exceed local government’s defects in Wichita.
My sources for these national assertions include but are not limited to the financial revelations about misconduct by both Democrats and Republicans in Peter Schweizer’s outstanding books: Secret Empire, Clinton Cash, and Extortion, are excellent. News media flaws nationally are documented by the .
Are We Rome? by Lawrence Reed is a brief, pamphlet sized outline (see Foundation for Economic Education) of our national financial and governmental challenges. Those who want to explore our national fiscal and institutional problems, I would recommend Dinesh D’Souza’s and Mark Levin’s numerous books. If we don’t get this right, Mark Steyn’s After America: Get Ready for Armageddon moves from a yellow warning light to a hideous, Venezuelan reality.
Fighting the good fight within government will be tough. Scott Walker’s Unintimidated: A Governor’s Story and a Nation’s Challenge describes the Wisconsin battle in exquisite detail. It is a valuable, but cautionary reality defenders of liberty can find incisive examples of the challenges ahead. Levin’s proposed constitutional amendments in the Liberty Amendments is also valuable reading.
Sadly, there aren’t any books like this for Kansas, let alone Wichita. Greg Jarrett has left Wichita and gone national with his excellent books. This essay is a report for the legacy of those interested in local government in the early 21st century. This also provides a report for anyone interested in the governmental legacy left for our heirs who will follow us in south-central Kansas.