Search results for: “Bill Warren”

  • Wichita Mayoral Debate, September 25, 2023

    This is a transcript of a debate between Wichita mayoral candidates Brandon Whipple and Lily Wu. The event was sponsored by KMUW radio in partnership with the Wichita Eagle, the Community Voice, and the Wichita Journalism Collaborative. A recording is here.

    I produced a transcript by feeding an audio recording to an AI-based speech recognition system. The system recognized speaker voices and assigned them numbers. I edited to add the names Whipple and Wu to speakers 3 and 4. Other than that, I made no changes. It contains about 10,600 words. Download a pdf here.

    Speaker 1

    Welcome to the mayoral debate. I’m Luann Stevens. I’m with Kmu W and we’d like to welcome you to the debate between Brandon Whipple and Lily Wu. And thank you again so much for coming here tonight. Civic and civil discussions are important, and so is being an informed voter. And we are proud of being part of tonight’s event. I’d like to thank our partners in tonight’s event at The Wichita Eagle, the Community Voice and the Wichita Journalism Collaborative. And thank you to Roxies, always a great host and a supporter of the community. Thanks for providing this wonderful venue. Tonight’s debate is being aired live on kmu. It’s being streamed on the Eagles web page kansas.com and also at kw.org, and the audio will be posted later this week on kww.org. So thank you once again and let me introduce tonight’s. Moderator Kwa’s, director of news and public affairs, Tom Shine.

    Speaker 2

    Thank you. And and thank you for joining us tonight. I think it’s a, could be it could be a great night and and a good discussion to be had tonight. So thank you. Let me start by introducing the people who are going to help us with the night’s debate. Our media panel asking questions includes Kylie Cameron, who’s the City Hall reporter for KMW, Diane. Leffler opinion, editor of The Wichita Eagle and Bonita Gooch, editor in chief of the Community Voice. The event is also being sponsored by the Wichita Journalism Collaborative, which is a group of 11 community partners working to build a more engaged and informed community. All of the Members here on the media panel are members of the Wichita Journalism Collaborative, helping us keep time tonight are Jill Cassado and Sharon else Slager. The Wichita Metro chapter of the League of Women Voters. Also, with us tonight from the League of Women Voters are Carol Neal, Sandra Rankin and Joan Warren. If you are interested in registering to vote or need to check on your registration, they can help you with that tonight as well. A breakdown of tonight’s debate format. It’s pretty simple. Each candidate will have one minute to respond to a question. Each candidate will then have 30 seconds of rebuttal or to add more insight or context to their answer, we will alternate who answers each question first. Here’s the most important thing I will ask you to hold your applause until the debate is finished. This is a form. It is not a sporting event, so please hold your applause if you must cheer. Cheer internally, please. Any cheering limits the number of questions we can ask the candidates. That’s what we’re all here for, is to hear from the candidates not to hear people cheer. When we get finished, I will let you cheer as loud as you want, but Please wait until we’re done with the debate. So we’re going to begin with three minute opening statements from each candidate. The order was determined by coin flip prior to the debate, Brandon won the coin cost toin coss coin toss and will go first. He also received the first question and Lily will go first. When we do closing statements. Again, let’s hold our applause. We finish and we’ll do with opening statements. 3 minutes of Brandon Whipple.

    Speaker 3 (Whipple)

    We on. All right. Hey. Thank you. Witchcraft for being here tonight for listening. Welcome, everybody. My name is Brandon Whipple, and for the past four years, it’s been an honor to serve as your mayor. When I took office back in 2020, the city was in crisis. We were facing the worst combined economic budget and public health.

    Speaker 2

    You’re on.

    Speaker 3 (Whipple)

    Challenges that we face in over a lifetime, the Max was grounded and COVID disrupted every aspect of our lives. And today we’re batting the fentanyl and the mental health epidemic that has left so many families in distress. But what separates Wichita from from other cities is that we don’t run from the problems we face. We don’t hide our heads in the sand, but instead we roll up our sleeves and we face these issues head on together as a community. Today, Wichita is once again leading the state in economic growth and development. With the most diverse pipeline of industry and the lowest sustained unemployment rate we’ve ever had in the last four years, we’ve created thousands of new jobs and we have seen $1.8 billion of raw economic capital invested in our city and our. When I first came to Wichita over 20 years ago as an AmeriCorps member to teach at risk, kids at South High School, I got to tell you guys, I felt like I hit the jackpot. Growing up, my parents taught me that the values of hard work and that hard work was the way to get things done. My mom was a waitress and my dad is a Carpenter. My parents are some of the hardest working people I know. But because of high property taxes and lack of affordable housing in the Northeast, they will never own a home on their own. But thanks to Wichita, I was able to not only be the first in my family to graduate college, but also to purchase and own a home. And that’s why I serve to continue those kinds of opportunities for now and the next generation. That’s why our focus on cutting taxes and fees and keeping costs low in Wichita to make it easier for families to make ends meet. Now this election presents a clear choice. Either we continue on the current path to prosperity, powered by the voices of wichitas people, or return City Hall into a toxic far right dark money politics of Americans for Prosperity before serving as mayor, I’m proud to say that I served seven years in the Kansas legislature fighting for the people of South Wichita. Against Americans for prosperity’s deceptive tactics and the failed Brownback tax experiment that they. Imported my experience gives me the tools I needed to balance the city budget, grow the economy, cut taxes, and invest in record amounts in both fire police and infrastructure. And we put a stop to backroom deals. I’m the only candidate running with a plan to keep our economic momentum going while also addressing homelessness, mental health and finally fixing. Public transportation and tonight I am excited to take your questions and to share our vision for the next four years of here in Wichita. And I know that we can achieve this together together. Again, I’m your mayor, Brenda Whipple, and I hope to earn your vote tonight.

    Speaker 2

    Lily, 3 minutes.

    Speaker 4 (Wu)

    Thank you again to our hosts, including Roxy’s downtown. The last time I was here was at gridiron, but the last time I was here as a reporter was to share and memorialize wichitan and award-winning performer Carla Burns. At that time, I asked Rick a question about his best friend and what he would say. He told me Carla would want people to believe in themselves, keep going despite setbacks and Nos. I’m Lily Wu, your former local television journalist. I love Wichita, and I’m grateful for the opportunities this Community has shown me and my family. I stand here today of political outsider and a first time candidate running for office to become the next mayor of Wichita because I understand our community. And believe Wichita deserves better. And the proud daughter of working class parents. My mom, a hair stylist and a cook right here in Wichita, a city I have called home for 30 years. My family and I immigrated from my birth country of Guatemala to Wichita in 1993, and the proud product of Wichita. Public schools having attended Lawrence Ray Woodman, Truesdale Middle School, Wichita East High and the International Baccalaureate program, I was the 1st in my family to graduate from college. Because I was fortunate to win a Gore scholarship in 2003, which allowed me the opportunity to attend WSU and earn 2 degrees in international business and integrated marketing communication. I then went on to win a Rotary ambassadorial scholarship to pursue my masters in journalism. From the University of Hong Kong. I’ve served as a community volunteer for more than 20 years and for the past 12 years I’ve been your local journalist, both at cake and KWCH. I’ve been able to, fortunately, tell your good and sad stories, and I’m listening to you. You’re tired of increasing crime. You’re tired of rising taxes and costs, and you’re tired of partisan bickering and unethical behavior. So on the 30th anniversary of coming to America, I launched A mayoral campaign that is all for Wichita. My vision is rooted in ensuring public safety, strengthening our economy, restoring trust in City Hall, and building a united community. It’s time we come together, focus on the core services of local government and make Wichita a better place to live, work and raise a family. Thank you.

    Speaker 2

    We’ll go to questions now. As we said earlier, one minute each from each candidate and then 30 seconds from each candidate on each quest. Brandon, you have the first question from Kylie Cameron of KMW.

    Speaker 3 (Whipple)

    What you got for me, Kelly?

    Speaker 5

    In 2022. Sedgwick County recorded more than 300 overdose deaths, with most of those being fentanyl related. That’s double the amount of people who died from an overdose in 2019. What will you do as mayor to address substance use in the comma?

    Speaker 3 (Whipple)

    It’s a really good question and thank you for for asking it. You’re right. We’re in the middle of an epidemic with opioids and folks who know me know that I take this personally because my sister’s recovering addict and I’m from New Hampshire and our state just got hit so hard with the opioid crisis a couple of decades ago. So some of the things are doing at the city level is making sure we’re partnering with our community. Nonprofits are already doing some of this work. As you might know, we were able to not only decriminalize fentanyl test strips, but also get Narcan out to a nonprofit called Safe Streets. It was one vote that cost us maybe about $20,000 in money that came in that was directed for opioid. Reasons and we know for the data that we have saved over 400 lives, people who would have been dead if it wasn’t for that one vote. And as we continue, we know that fentanyl and overdoses, we have to arm our first responders with Narcan so they can bring people back to life. But once we see this rollout, we got to make sure we also have those social services. Necessary so that people can get the help that they need, particularly when it comes to such an addictive substance as fentanyl.

    Speaker 4 (Wu)

    That number is staggering. 300 individuals, those are someones mother. Daughter. Son. I had the opportunity to share those stories as a local reporter and I know the effects that it has not just on the individuals who overdose, but those who’ve been affected by those who’ve died from. Fentanyl overdose. I’ve had the opportunity to have conversations with our partners in Sedgwick County, both the day’s office and the Sedgwick County Sheriff’s deputies, and I know how critical it is that as a Community, we need to have a conversation about one pill can kill. It needs to be not only at the. School level but. It also needs to be across our community. We need to be concerned citizens and we can all be part of the solution. I’m proud to say that I’ve always said that public safety needs to be the number one concern in our community, and when we have a drug crisis in our Community, it’s a public safety issue and over the last four years, public safety has continued to be the number one problem that people want to see solved and something that has not been addressed.

    Speaker 2

    30 seconds, Mr. whip.

    Speaker 3 (Whipple)

    So the education campaign is part of it. The one pill can kill that’s only the first step, next step being harm reduction strategies that have been tested and proven to work in other areas. And you also need treatment facilities so that folks who are recovering can actually get the treatment that they need. And that’s why you need a mayor who understands public policy and understands where to look for the best policies as we move forward. Cuz I won’t let Wichita turn into some of those towns in New Hampshire where some of my friends are. Currently addicted and many of them have died from.

    Speaker 2

    30 seconds, miss.

    Speaker 4 (Wu)

    Wu and again those numbers are just during the same leadership period as as our current mayor. I want to reiterate that there are local resources available in our community. And we need to have greater awareness of those that provide services for those who are struggling with not just substance use issues, but also mental health. That is another critical issue in our community. And I believe that local government has a role to play, but our Community also has a greater role to play and I believe that. Each and every one of us has an opportunity to be part of the solution.

    Speaker 2

    Next question from Diane Leffler of The Wichita Eagle. Miss, will you up first?

    Speaker 6

    The state government has outlawed transgender people from using public restrooms corresponding to their gender identity and is requiring them to use facilities corresponding to the sex they were. Signed at birth. This creates a known risk that transgender individuals could be singled out for verbal and even physical abuse from individuals opposed to their identity. What can and should the city do to protect people’s right to use public restrooms without fear of harassment and or violence?

    Speaker 4 (Wu)

    I had an opportunity to speak with both the city manager and. Was assistant city managers last week. Asking them what have they seen as issues and they tell me whether a non discrimination ordinance that we currently have, they have not seen those issues. And again I want to reiterate that I am someone who respects all individuals. My mother who’s right there would never let me be someone. Other than someone who respects and loves others, so I want to make sure that everyone understands that I. Come from a point of view that respects all, but we also need to have accessible bathrooms for all. When I have elderly individuals that tell me there there are no bathrooms for them to take their elderly parents who cannot get into a bathroom, that’s a problem too. So we need to think more outside of traditional methods. And think about family bathrooms and I’m glad to hear that the city of Wichita now is seeing development in city properties that always have family bathrooms.

    Speaker 2

    Mr. Whipple one.

    Speaker 3 (Whipple)

    Minute. Sorry. Can you repeat the question?

    Speaker 6

    Yes, I can. The state government has outlawed transgender people from using public restrooms corresponding to their gender identity and is requiring them to use facilities corresponding to the sex they were assigned at birth. This creates a known risk that transgender individuals could be singled out for verbal and even physical abuse. From individuals opposed to their.

    Speaker 3 (Whipple)

    Alright, thanks.

    Speaker 6

    What can and should the city do to protect?

    Speaker 3 (Whipple)

    I just want to make sure we’re talking about the rights of the LGBTQ community and not just bathrooms on my watch. We’ve been able to pass the strongest non discrimination ordinance in the entire city or entire state of Kansas. We’ve also scored for the first time, and now the second time this year in Wichita’s history, a perfect score of 100 from the Human Rights Campaign when it comes to equality.

    Speaker 6

    People’s rights.

    Speaker 3 (Whipple)

    To make sure that Wichita isn’t just a place. For folks who consider themselves in the majority but also a place for everyone because it can’t truly be for all of which, Atta, if you’re not for all of Wichita, so as we move forward, we need to continue to push back and challenge the legislature when they decide to take discriminatory policies to a new level where it threatens the lives of which itens, who I represent. It doesn’t matter who you are. I’m your mayor, and I’m gonna defend you, and I’m gonna defend your rights. My second.

    Speaker 2

    Miss Blue 30 seconds.

    Speaker 4 (Wu)

    Non Discrimination ordinance is important, but the way that it was brought forth was divisive and that is what which agents have told me. They’re tired of divisiveness, not just in local politics but at the national level here in Wichita, we can make a difference because we as wichitans. Don’t want to see ourselves as one or the other. We want to see ourselves as wichitans, and reminding ourselves that the track record of this current mayor regarding the LGBTQ community, the way you brought forth that ordinance, created division. And that’s not what.

    Speaker 2

    Mr. Whipple 30 seconds.

    Speaker 3 (Whipple)

    My non discrimination ordinance had more support from members of the faith community than members against had the support of the Wichita Chamber of Commerce add support of our largest employers? Ohh, and it’s the right thing to do. Fighting for civil rights might not be the nice thing to do, but it is the right thing to do and I’d rather be the good guy and on the right side of history, even if it’s divisive. If it’s protecting the rights of the people I represent and I’m never going to apologize for that.

    Speaker 2

    Next question please, from Bonita Gooch of the Community Voice. Mr. Whipple, your first.

    Speaker 7

    OK, I never heard it either. Your opening statements address environmental concerns in Northeast Wichita, there’s a truck stop that was recently approved that will emit that diesel fuel. Over the concerns of a nearby community, a historic but only recently revealed toxic spill, we have ponds and rivers. We can’t eat the fish from. We have a diminishing tree canopy, lots of illegal dumping and St. trash and uncontrolled use of plastic bags. If elected, what would you prioritize to address to to address local environmental issues?

    Speaker 3 (Whipple)

    That question since elected, we’re able to create a board that’s dedicated for environmental issues, the sustainability and environment aboard, and we also funded them with $100,000. The startup fund so that they can help us bring not only policy, but also issues and start making those changes. I think it’s incredibly important, particularly when we’re dealing with state level and federal level environmental. Issues that we get that information out on a local level, that still you’re talking about is something that happened I think decades ago and Kathe just wound up sitting on it. The state just sat on it. The last mayor to even talk about this or know about it was Mayor Brewer. So we got to have better relationships when it comes to the state departments so we can get that information out to the community. The other thing we have to do is be smart. While we look ahead when it comes to environmental issues. Right now, the city of Wichita, our public buildings with 98%. Wind energy. We are trading our gas guzzling buses for good battery powered buses, electric buses and we put over $10 million in charging station infrastructure over the last year thanks to a federal grant. So we’re on the right path. I just need a. Second, turn to finish the job.

    Speaker 2

    Miss will one minute.

    Speaker 4 (Wu)

    Benita environmental issues, especially in our North End, I’ve been Privy to attend those community meetings and I’ve been listening. I hear the pain that people are suffering from not having the communication from government. That is a lack that not only we need to work on as a local government, but also at all levels. The lack of communication to our residents has created not only division but distrust in local government. And so first and foremost, we need a a mayor that is not just. Informed about the issues of what’s happening in the North End, but also making sure that they continue to listen and be at the table listening to our residents, asking them what their concerns. These are the problem though is when I knock on the doors of our neighbors on the North End, what they tell me they’re most tired about is rising crime, and that is the issue that we need to focus our energy back on. It’s the priorities of local government. Environmental issues have a place, but priorities need to come first.

    Speaker 2

    Mr. Whipple third.

    Speaker 3 (Whipple)

    2nd so I mean, as a news reporter, Lily, you could have also done a story about this if we were not on top of getting the information now we lean our media partners to correct us at the city level. We’re missing something as we move forward though, one of the things I’ve been able to do is bring more people to the table by creating boards or creating a task force. Including the the Board on Diversity, Inclusion and civil rights. So we are appointing people who used to be left out of the room now to run these meetings to make sure that we’re not only forward thinking as a community, but we’re inclusive in that forward thinking and plan.

    Speaker 4 (Wu)

    The individual missing from those listening sessions on our North End is an individual who’s also on the stage with me. I’m listening to this community attending meetings, listening to our residents, really getting a pulse of what you all want. And as I’ve knocked on your doors and I’ve attended community meetings. What you tell me is you want local government to focus back their energy on public safety and growing this economy.

    Speaker 2

    Next question, coming back to Kylie Cameron from KMW, Lily Wu you. Are up first.

    Speaker 5

    As the city works towards functional 0 for homelessness in the city, it also continues to sweep homeless encampments and push people who live there to other parts of the city. Is this a policy you support?

    Speaker 4 (Wu)

    I had the opportunity to go on police ride alongs, including with the homeless outreach team, and I can tell you. It’s a problem that not only requires compassion, but it also requires us to become more collaborative. We cannot just push residents out of our downtown core to other communities like South End, where I grew up, residents tell me that they are tired of seeing people not being treated with compassion. But it’s also because the reason why we are in this position is because we have. Nearly 300 bed shortage in the shelters, so we need to get back to the core reason why we are seeing our homeless or houseless population out there. And we have a current mayor who could be doing something about this, but the problem has simply increased over the last four years, the number of homeless four years ago was just under 600. With that point in time, it was 702 this year. So we need new leadership in City Hall.

    Speaker 2

    Mr. Whipple one minute.

    Speaker 3 (Whipple)

    Hey, I’m gonna start off the same time. I never do you like that? I would never say someone on this stage is something wrong. So I’m sorry that happened to. But as we get to functional 0, we gotta actually look at the causes of homelessness and not just work on just managing the problem. However, I will say on my watch we have put more into homelessness and homelessness prevention than the last 20 years combined 20 years combined. Millions upon millions of dollars, thanks to federal federal resources that we’re able to get in. Also, I’m the only mayor in recent memory that puts a quarter $1,000,000 into our shelters every single. People winter to make sure that wichitans aren’t freezing on the streets and we’ve got to continue to work with our partners over United Way. I’m working with them. I’m making sure that we get the function of 0 and I’m the only one who’s running for office, not just on the stage. Who actually has a $9.5 million plan to address functional 0 by leveraging our federal funds and changing our paradigm. We gotta solve the problem, not just manage the problem. It’s not about how many meals did you give out. It’s about how many people did you get house. I need my second term so I can get that done.

    Speaker 2

    30 seconds. Miss blue.

    Speaker 4 (Wu)

    Collaboration, not competition, and one of the things that I have not seen at these homeless task force meetings. Is you, mayor? So I would like to say that it’s important to have a leader that wants to collaborate and bring more of our community together. The nonprofit sector, local government, as well as state government to find funding to come down to Wichita, but also our business community because we all can play a role in helping. With those of our neighbors who are facing a houseless situation.

    Speaker 2

    Mr. Whipple 30 seconds.

    Speaker 3 (Whipple)

    So I apologize to my opponent, but more than four members of the Council can’t actually be in on a meeting or else would be a violation of our ethics ordinance. So I don’t attend those meetings. I do one-on-one, updates with leaders throughout our city, including the leaders over United Way, including my council members who attend those meetings. Including with leaders who have a stake in the game. And again, my goal is to get to functional 0 instead of insulting me, come up with a plan. Tell me, what is your $9.5 million plan to actually get people off the streets and house cuz all I’m hearing is insults and I’m here to trade ideas.

    Speaker 2

    Next question please, Diane Leffler of The Wichita Eagle. Mr. Whipple, you’re up first.

    Speaker 6

    City Hall talks constantly about the need to attract and retain young people in Wichita, but the rising price of housing has made it increasingly difficult for them to stay and put down roots here. Meanwhile, the city spends millions subsidizing development of expensive luxury apartments. To put upward pressure on the housing market. Do you believe city policy is meeting its stated goal of attracting and retaining young adult? Or does it need to be changed and if so?

    Speaker 3 (Whipple)

    How so? We are attracting more young adults than we have at any point in our city’s history because we now have a medical school downtown and we also are developing a Medical Center with WSU and with KU, which is gonna bring in even more people from around the country into our core. So we have to continue the progress when it comes to building apartments and building. Housing, but also that housing has to be affordable. We’re about 20 to 40,000 units shy right now and because developers have run City Hall for so long, the majority of the incentives actually go to only 30% of the market, which are single family homes. So instead we have to emphasize. And incentivize infill and we have to incentivize multi unit homes in our core, so long as they match the character of the neighborhood and by throwing supply at it, simple supply and demand economics by throwing supply at it, we’re going to be able to actually get the cost down. It’s been done in other cities. It’s gonna be done in. Wichita in my second term.

    Speaker 2

    Miss one minute.

    Speaker 4 (Wu)

    That’s actually something I agree with you, mayor. This is a supply issue. In order to have more affordable housing, we must have more housing. In general, we need to have housing that is affordable at all levels and accessible. Unfortunately, though, right now we face about a 19,000 unit shortage of rental properties so that folks can have accessible and rentable. Properties. So in order to attract young people to stay in Wichita, we do need to focus on. But we need to focus it more responsibly. And you’re right, developers have a role to play. Developers build, they build restaurants, they build homes. So we need them at the table. But we need to hold them accountable if we are going to be in partnership with them. Developers and anyone who. Receives incentives from the city of Wichita must be able to be transparent in the process of getting that bid. Must hold the developer accountable and must be able to show a great return on investment on taxpayer dollars.

    Speaker 2

    Mr. Whipple 30 seconds.

    Speaker 3 (Whipple)

    Yeah, we got the more supply at it. We’re able to shift our baseball stadium deal to make sure that it has apartments and not just office spaces. I agree. When it comes to transparency, I’m the one who actually holds developers accountable. We’re actually suing people to get our taxpayer money back. Who thought they could rip off the city with impunity? That doesn’t happen on my watch, and we’re gonna make sure we continue that practice.

    Speaker 2

    Miss Whipple, 30, Miss Wu. 30 seconds. Excuse me.

    Speaker 4 (Wu)

    Mayor again, as a young person myself who chose to stay in Wichita, I chose this community because I believe that there are opportunities in economic ones for all, but we need to share those opportunities with more of our Community. They need to be aware of those. Opportunities not just in jobs but also in housing. And we need as a mayor be the ambassador of this community to share and connect the dots for people because we need to retain our young people, but we also need to grow our economy.

    Speaker 2

    Real quickly, someone seems to be keeping time on their phone. Here we have time keepers here, so if you can turn your phones off, that would be great. And another question now from Bonita Gooch of the Community Voice. Miss Wu, you’re up first.

    Speaker 7

    Now, Miss Woo, you’ve told me that public safety is your #1 issue. And while some people support flooding, law enforcement with more and more funding, there’s another theory that looks at funding prevention programs as a way to reduce crime, with the result less need for enforcing. Do you support funding prevention programs as a way to reduce crime in Wichita? And if you do, what ideas do you have on how this type of programming could be funded and implemented?

    Speaker 4 (Wu)

    Prevention programs are critical. We need our officers also be to be part of that solution in terms of prevention prevention programs like the juvenile. Intervention unit over at USD259, the future ready advocates who are helping with reduction in crime in young people getting into crime. These are aspects that we need to focus our energy on. But the current Police Department is facing 100 police officer shortage and 100 more officers who are eligible for retirement when we can’t have police officers working focused on community policing, what they’re doing is just entering emergency calls and that does not breed. Proactive preventative measures, so we need to fix public safety and that begins at the Police Department level. And I will say that there is one way to help with reduction of crime in general and that is we all together must work towards making sure that Wichita is a place that we all hold ourselves accountable and our young people accountable for.

    Speaker 2

    Mr. Whipple one minute.

    Speaker 3 (Whipple)

    All right. Thank you for the question. We’ve actually invested more in public safety than in at any point in our city’s history, but that’s not just going to more officers, although we are trying to transfer in the best and the brightest and we’re trying to create more policy to get more officers. Again, however, we have to make investments in our youth programs and also our mental health programs. One of the things that we just saw about a week ago is a mental health crisis with a person with a gun who was threatening self harm and what happened was our officers were able to make a tactical retreat and bring in our mental health professionals to negotiate with this person and actually. Help them, and in doing that the situation was able to close without. Bloodshed. Now we don’t have to parachute into communities or even get our cops to do it. There are people doing incredible work in our communities and that’s why we put aside money in our violence interrupter programs to identify those people who is working with our youth right now. Who’s actually out there? Have the experience in what we call the social equity to make a positive change. And how can a city come alongside them? And be helpful to them. Is it money? Is it resources? Is it an office at one of our neighbors associations? What can we do to partner with them? And that’s something.

    Speaker 2

    We’re exploring Miss Wu 30 seconds.

    Speaker 4 (Wu)

    Funny you mentioned relational capital, because that is the very first thing that the Wichita Police Department will. Need they need a new leader? Who actually will help bridge not just the mayor’s office, but the Police Department and our community. When you lack the respect and the resources from the mayor’s office, you will not be able to retain and attract more officers. And we need trained officers. We also need officers that focus on prevention, but when we have a shortage in officers, they can’t focus on those efforts and that’s what we need to.

    Speaker 2

    Mr. Whipple 30 seconds.

    Speaker 3 (Whipple)

    Look, I’m in constant contact with our police chief. I’m a constant contact with leadership team. I’m the mayor that provided them over $30 million. I voted every single way that the FOP has asked us to vote when it comes to modernization and their contracts. And I’ll tell you, our officers are tough. No one goes to work wondering if I like them. OK, officers go to work because they have a calling, a calling to keep our cities safe. And the idea that, oh, it’s about relationships. No, it’s about resources. It’s about. What is it that I could do to help you be a better officer and help you be a best police force and right now. We’re on a path to that.

    Speaker 2

    Next question, another round of questions, starting again with Kylie Cameron of KMW. Mr. Whipple, you are up first.

    Speaker 5

    The city of Wichita recently resold land near the ballpark for a dollar an acre. It’s also engaged in several public private partnerships in that area and downtown. What can be done to ensure that taxpayers don’t have to bear the burden if these deals don’t meet their benchmarks?

    Speaker 3 (Whipple)

    Yeah, I’ll tell you part of my job is to utilize my legislative experience and my formal education to go back and fix the problems of the past. Sadly, the previous mayor and administration didn’t tie those development parcels to the actual owner of the baseball team. If that baseball team was to be sold and instead tied it to the owner of the team, even after that team was sold. Which means we had a guy living out of state sitting on those parcels in that development. Holding them hostage. Luckily, the team was able to navigate, so we got those back onto the table so that we can get that developed because if we don’t, that goes bankrupt and it’s not about where I believe, you know, if I’m in support or non support, if something when I get into office, my job is to fix it and there is nothing that would have been worse. Through our economy, when it comes that $80 million stadium then not having to pay its own bills to the STAR Bond project, we had to get that moving again. Glad we’re able to get that moving again. But again, it’s because the contract is pretty shoddy and likely I was able to utilize my legislative experience, go in and cut a deal that saved that ballpark.

    Speaker 4 (Wu)

    It’s it’s that same legislative experience that you’ve had for four years that you did not work on until we were pushed up against the wall. I always say that it’s important to engage our community at a point when before you’re pushed against the wall, you should ask our community. What should have happened with that parcel being sold at a dollar an acre? We should have asked our Community what are. Other individuals, organizations or just entities that might want to help with fixing the problem. You’ve had those four years and knew that this problem was lingering, yet did nothing until you were pushed against the wall, and then you made a decision with the Council. So it is important that we. Remind ourselves that over the last four years, the focus has been on public safety and that has not been your priority.

    Speaker 2

    Mr. Whipple 30 seconds.

    Speaker 3 (Whipple)

    Alright, gotta try to explain star bonds in 30 seconds. You have to get approval at the state level. You gotta get approval at the local level. You have to get at least two to three different economic studies to validate it, and then you have to actually get it moving. Your suggestion you can’t legally do. You can’t go back to the drawing board unless you have state approval and you start the process. All over again, and the fact that you think that, I think means that you need to learn a little more about this before one thing. You become mayor or two things. You you, you start discrediting the entirety of the City Council who works so hard to save baseball. We can’t afford an $80 million. Deficit, especially when we can save it and I’m not going to be lectured about public safety by someone who wants to crash our economic development project down there costs an $80 million that could go into our.

    Speaker 2

    Police Miss Wu 30 seconds.

    Speaker 4 (Wu)

    There are needs in there once in our community wants to feel safe and that is why. I refocus our efforts on what is important and that is what local governments should be doing. They should be prioritizing what the local government should be focusing on, and those are public safety issues. A baseball stadium is great. I love attending and seeing the community activated, but we need to prioritize the things that really move our community forward with economic development and safety, and that is making sure that we can truly ensure public safety for all around Wichita.

    Speaker 2

    Next question, Diane Leffler of the Eagle’s Miss Wu, you’re up first.

    Speaker 6

    City Hall has dedicated itself in recent years to what is called a road diet, essentially reducing 4 lane streets to two lane streets with a center turn lane, including major thoroughfares like McLean and North Broadway. Do you support continuing this policy of reducing traffic lanes for cars? Why or why?

    Speaker 4 (Wu)

    I’m really glad you said that because over the weekend I had the opportunity to travel across especially our downtown core and making sure that it is not just safe to walk across the street when we push the crosswalk sign, but making sure that people are also active in our community when we have things like Park run. The exploration place when we have things that really activate the downtown core, we need to be mindful that traffic needs to be something that we need to reduce in those areas where we do see increases in traffic. Another thing that I was really excited about was just two weeks ago when Open Streets ICT was around, seeing more people activated and being part of a community are important. So we need to continue thinking smart from reducing those lanes from 4:00 to 2:00 and making sure that we activate the community though and asking them is this the best decision moving forward? So I believe that it’s important to really engage you all, making sure that we’re listening to you and then moving forward with the decisions that City Hall makes.

    Speaker 2

    Mr. Whipple one minute.

    Speaker 3 (Whipple)

    Did you say one minute? One minute. All right. So when it makes sense. So if we’re going to do a road diet to increase safety for pedestrians and also for bike lanes, it makes sense in areas that we know we’re gonna have more growth, such as our downtown knowing that we’re gonna bring more students there. 80% of the folks who are attending the Med school. Usually live downtown, so in areas like that it makes sense. In other areas like West Street where we’re widening those streets, that’s because in the industrial areas we’re learning by talking to those businesses by bringing people to the. Table that they need large turning lanes for their trucks, so you’ll see us widen it in certain areas and then skinning them down in other areas. Again, we don’t just randomly do this. We work with our team to make sure that if we’re gonna make any changes, it has to make sense, cuz no one wants to be on the receiving end of a die on Lefler. Opinion piece. If we don’t cross our T’s and dot our eyes. So trust me, Diane, we’re trying to make it make sense and. We can explain it.

    Speaker 2

    Miss Wu, 30 seconds.

    Speaker 4 (Wu)

    I think that one of the things that we don’t share enough about is how do we attract young people and young people want to see a walkable city. They want to see a city that makes sense. And when we communicate with our community while we’re doing certain things that breeds better communication with young people and just residents in general. And that’s not something that this current leadership has done. We need to continue, really engaging the community, but not just engage. You all communicating why certain processes happen if there are community engagement processes. Most of our community needs to know that they exist when they only happen in One Direction. Just communication being thrown at you versus coming in. Also with two way communication then then the. Community believes that there’s no trust and we need to get back to that. We need to get back to trusting local government so communication has to be the key.

    Speaker 2

    Mr. Whipple 30 seconds.

    Speaker 3 (Whipple)

    I mean, it’s not just communication, it’s relationships. Frankly, it’s the benefit of the doubt. If you’re doing this job well and you’re not just there when you’re campaigning, but you’re actually there to listen and to build relationships. If someone is concerned about something, they’ll come to you and they look to the other side of it and that’s the gold standard when it comes to elections. It’s not just being likable, it’s actually. Getting that benefit of the doubt where folks can say, well, what are you doing over here and why? And give us an opportunity to say, well, This is why and this is what we’re doing and that’s how I do policy right now. Our budget, for example, it had more public input this year than any time in our city’s history to make sure we’re hitting on those priorities. And the last time we broke a record was last year, next year gonna break the record again.

    Speaker 2

    The next question from Bonita Gooch of the Community Voice. Mr. Whipple, you’re up.

    Speaker 7

    First, let’s do it. OK, there are a lot of boarded and abandoned houses in Wichita. That are attracting criminals, drug addicts and the houseless. Do you have any idea of how to address this problem with abandoned and boarded up houses? But what happens? Also, considering that I know you’re tearing a lot of them down, which creates another problem. Empty lots, weeds and dumping. Considering we have an affordable housing shortage, just want to throw that in there, do you have any creative ideas to address our problem with boarded up and abandoned housing?

    Speaker 3 (Whipple)

    You’re hitting on the head. It’s a complex issue. One of the things that the Council does is we do everything we can to save a House. We bring people in and we ask them what you need. And at some point, even Maggie Ballard, Council member, was able to get folks connected with donated lumber and to get those houses. Back in shape, the ones that can’t be saved when you got, as you mentioned, they become a public safety issue once if they have to get demolished. If we can’t turn them over a nonprofit, the city now has a land bank where if we were to get that parcel or if we’re gonna get that house, we can turn it over to Habitat for Humanity or to our nonprofit sector. I think that’s gonna be a key in. This as well and also we don’t want the houses to get that way. I have a plan to work with our neighbor associations and to utilize grant funds so that they can help us target neighbors, particularly elderly folks who actually can’t do the work on their own. But we want to keep them in the neighborhood. Can we get some money to the neighbor associations so they can get the volunteers and actually get those houses worked on and keep those? House is up to par so mom and Dad can stay where they live. I think that’s gonna. Be important too. As we move forward, Miss will one minute.

    Speaker 4 (Wu)

    Benita, one of the things that I have been really grateful for these last few months is listening to more community members, including those that are Realtors that are auctioneers that are also facing homelessness and also just not accessible to the housing that they need. And what they’re telling me is that we need to see it more broadly. And as I mentioned earlier, we said that housing is a supply issue. We don’t have enough housing. And when you have housing that could be repaired or another developer can think about how to reimagine the space. You still need the community. Engagement. And so someone who wants to engage more of the community would want to have Habitat for Humanity at the table asking them what are your proposed solutions? Because local government may not have all the answers and they shouldn’t. That’s why we rely on others who are experts. And I ask whenever there are. Issues in our Community, not just talk about the problem, but also ask where those solutions are and places like Habitat for Humanity are one of those places to ask.

    Speaker 2

    So Whipple 30 seconds.

    Speaker 3 (Whipple)

    So the job of the mayor is also to support our City Council members when it comes to collecting that information from the public. Our district advisory boards usually do that at the Council level. My job is to support the Council member and to work with them through these issues. So I don’t think we need to recreate anything that’s already created. But I think that when it comes to inflation and it comes to property. Work with the nonprofits and actually attacking the supply side of. It’s gonna get that inflation and that costs low and also even building some of the more luxury apartments that actually frees up some of the lower end stuff. For example, my wife and I, we had a little two-bedroom house. Now we have a basically a blouse for our kid. But that two-bedroom house is still there, and now it’s being used by family members. So I think it’s very important that we add supply and we don’t give up on these houses. And if we do, we get another house.

    Speaker 2

    Back on that lot, this will 30 seconds.

    Speaker 4 (Wu)

    Since you’re bringing up inflation, that is something that our communities are all facing working class families are facing. Increasing and increases of costs, whether it’s increasing. Taxes that they have seen over the last four. Years or just? Increasing utility prices and that is something that can be corrected. I have run on a campaign that opposes tax increases because I know from working class families that that is not something that they want to see. And so we need to fix the housing issue. But in order to do that also we need to be mindful that working class families, what they’re asking for is stop increasing our prices.

    Speaker 2

    Next question from coming back to Kylie Cameron of KMW. Lily Wu, you’re up first on this question.

    Speaker 5

    Wichita Transit continues to operate on limited hours and limited routes. Should the city look at revamping its transit services to make them more accommodating for residents.

    Speaker 4 (Wu)

    Absolutely, Kylie. I had the opportunity to speak with leadership across the street at Cedric County and I believe that this is not just the Cedric County, but it’s an issue that is more regional and we need to think of transit in a regional way. We need to engage the workforce, the industry, asking them how can we better serve you in getting workers to your companies when we have a transit bus that only stops at the city limit and people can’t get to places like Textron Aviation, we have an issue. So we need to engage our employers. As well, to be part of this solution, but I believe that it requires a regional approach and also a collaborative approach, and that requires someone that can work well. Between City of Wichita, Sedgwick County and our partners, I’ve had the opportunity to be at the Sedgwick County Association of Cities, where, as just a Community member, I attend because it’s important that we all see ourselves as part of the region, not just Wichita.

    Speaker 2

    Mr. Whipple one minute.

    Speaker 3 (Whipple)

    So the city of Wichita is the only entity that actually runs the Wichita public transportation. But you’re right, there is a way when it comes to a regional strategy moving forward. Right now our issue is really bus drivers is we don’t have enough bus drive. And I think that there’s a play if we’re smart, where we could actually tap into folks who are driving for Wichita public schools, folks who are driving for WSU. Is there a way in which we can pull in some of these resources and have a more regional transit plan so that you might be driving a school bus in a day, but then a night you’re driving? One of our buses, and if we could bring more and also. A lot of people don’t know this. We actually train our own CDL license our own bus drivers. So if folks are interested in getting a CDL for free, you can do so by signing up to be a part of our team at the City of Wichita and get that credential. I think also part of that is putting that credentialing process into some of our neighbors. Neighborhood buildings, so people who are looking to pivot in this economy could earn that credential and actually pivot into working for the city or working somewhere else with their commercial driver’s license.

    Speaker 2

    Miss Wu, 30 seconds.

    Speaker 4 (Wu)

    We have a talent shortage, whether it’s in our Police Department or other areas around our. Community. That’s why we need a mayor who can serve as an ambassador to attract not only talent into our community, but also investment. You need someone who you’re proud of, making sure that that person is a collaborator working with Sedgwick County with our lawmakers, working with nonprofits and our community, we need someone that really. Advocates for the city of Wichita as someone who you cannot be proud of by being someone that can be at the table and collaborate instead of compete.

    Speaker 2

    Mr. Whipple 30 seconds.

    Speaker 3 (Whipple)

    Alright, so back to the question. The other thing that which doesn’t have the other cities do is we don’t have a designated tax source that goes right into our public transportation system. It’s actually a general fund allocation. So every other city that’s doing this better, they’ve been able to pretty much mark a percentage. Of gas tax or street tax into their public transit systems so they can make these revisions and keep that, that process moving forward. And I think there’s a great opportunity for us to get there if we have someone in the office who actually knows how to navigate tax policy.

    Speaker 2

    Next question, Mr. Leffler from The Wichita Eagle. Brandon, you are first.

    Speaker 3 (Whipple)

    Give it to me down.

    Speaker

    OK.

    Speaker 6

    The city has replaced parking meters around our downtown attractions with a privatized smartphone based system, that is. More expensive and for many people far more difficult to use. Do you support this system and why or why?

    Speaker 3 (Whipple)

    Not man, we’re just getting nailed by downs. Diane’s top issues, so there’s no right answer for this. For me, the actually the right answer is we need a blended approach. We have to modernize our public parking because frankly our meters people don’t have coins anymore. They’re not carrying A roll of quarters around with them. And most of the time people will park, take the risk. The big ticket. And then they’re mad at me because the city ticketed them. I think as we move forward, though, we can embrace technology with the app services while also having a kiosk where people can pay using cash or credit and also utilizing still some of the older techno. There’s nothing wrong with it, so I think as we move forward, we can see some more strategic turnover with the new technology. But also I get it. That’s what I get chewed on for folks who have been doing it the same way for years and now they’re doing it some other way and I’ll just fix it. All right. So if I get my second term, I’ll make sure you guys get the. Meters you need as we also transition over to some of the more technical modern approaches.

    Speaker 2

    Miss one minute.

    Speaker 4 (Wu)

    As a Community member who attended the ICT Summit just last week and we talked about the issue of parking, we do have to think smart, but we also have to remind ourselves that in our Community, just as I mentioned earlier, we have to think a little bit differently and walking in our Community needs to be something that we need to start getting used to it. It’s good to walk and when we think about parking in the downtown core, there are places to park. Maybe not as convenient as others would like, but when you think of a big city and a growing city like ours. Parking lots make up real estate that could be used for those grocery stores that people keep talking about, so we need to think about parking in a smart and effective way, but also think about different ways to approach parking and walking because I believe that wichitans want to be part of a growing. City and that requires us to think like a bigger city, and that is sometimes parking that might be just a little bit further away.

    Speaker 2

    Mr. Whipple 30 seconds.

    Speaker 3 (Whipple)

    Well, The thing is, not everyone has the luxury of walking. The people who I hear the most push back from when it comes to changing these plans or older folks, folks who like to go to the shows at century too, and they are hesitant to put their information into credit card into a cell phone cuz they’re the targets of scams. So I think just telling people, hey, we gotta walk more. I wanna walk more. I wanna look better. I wanna get my steps in. Don’t get me wrong, but not everyone I talk to in Wichita has that luxury. So what can we do to also accommodate them? And I think it’s not too much to ask to keep a lot with the older technology going as we transition over. And also in Wichita, if you mess with people’s parking to get pretty upset, so you gotta make sure you gotta make sure. That you got a plan for that.

    Speaker 2

    Miss move 30 seconds.

    Speaker 4 (Wu)

    Accommodating those who cannot walk, who have wheelchair that need wheelchair access is important, and I believe that when when we had this new parking option in downtown Wichita, it needed to be communicated to our, to our Community. Be better, and that is something that I always say as the city government, we need to communicate with our community, not just passively, but really out there. So you understand not only how the process works and how your information will be protected with these programs. And so I believe that it requires someone in elected office. That also communicates the benefits and the costs of these new technologies.

    Speaker 2

    We will now move to closing statements here 2 minutes for each candidate. Lily Wu will go first.

    Speaker 4 (Wu)

    Well, thank you again, Tom and Kylie, Benita and Diane. Four years ago, we were promised change and leadership did not deliver. Wichita deserves better. A better leader and a better ambassador for our community. A leader you can be proud of. I’ve been traveling across Wichita asking are you satisfied with local government and I don’t get many hands raised. Crime is rising, costs are increasing, career politicians continue to deteriorate. Our trust in local government. People are disappointed. They also feel less safe. They’re tired of partisan bickering and unethical behavior. Career politicians who got us into this mess are not the ones who will get us out of it. I’ve been listening to you and I hear you. We want change, new leadership. And a fresh perspective. My vision is rooted in ensuring public safety, growing our economy, restoring trust in City Hall and building a united community. I will work with anyone who wants to improve our city, make our community better, find common ground and make Wichita proud. I’m a political outsider who wants to serve the city she has called home for 30 years. I want. This city to be a better place to live, work and raise a family. I’m Lily Wu and I hope to earn your vote on November 7th.

    Speaker 2

    Mr. Mr. Mr. Whipple. 2 minutes please.

    Speaker 3 (Whipple)

    Alright, over the last hour I’ve really enjoyed answering your questions and sharing our ideas for the next four years here in Wichita, but these are not just our ideas. These are our values and our values are that no one in Wichita who gives their time and talents to build our city and economy should live in poverty. Should live paycheck to paycheck or should have to worry if they can afford school supplies or new sneakers for their kids at the start of the school year. And I’m proud to call Wichita home to 1st class Apprenticeships and educational opportunities. Brave entrepreneurs, strong unions and hard working folks who have elevated our city to its current status as again leading the state of Kansas and economic opportunity and growth. Because of you, Wichita remains the best place to live. Work and raise a family, and while I’m encouraged by our accomplishments over the last four years, our work is not finish. In our own city, the city you built, the power of the working class is being threatened by my opponent. She is the handpicked candidate of the same insiders who want to use City Hall as a slush fund to expand profits at the cost of services and investments that we all benefit from. Never before in our city’s history of these political insiders. And dark money machines came together and throw so much against the sitting mayor. And while I’m flattered to those insiders and to all who want to claw back the progress that we’ve achieved for the working families, I simply say bring it. On because what we do today, what we do today and the decisions we make over the next four years will determine the directory of our city over the next three decades. And when my kids are my age or our age 30 years from now, I want them to look back on this moment and say that we delivered for them. That we actually made the decisions and we made the hard calls to make sure that they had a life here in Wichita that is worthy of them to inherit, that they can get a piece of the American dream right here in our city and don’t have to climb an airplane and ride off to some coast. With that, I want to thank the Eagle. I want to thank the boys. I want to thank UW. Tom Shine, thank you. And also can we give up for Chelsea, my wife, I want to thank her for putting up with me. While I do this stuff. Thank you, Chelsea. A round of applause for the candidates, please.

    Speaker 1

    So thank you once again to our partners, Wichita Eagle Community Boys, Wichita Journalism Collaborative. Thank you to Roxies for providing this great videos. So and here are some upcoming dates to remember October 17th. That is the last day to register to vote. October 23rd. That’s when in person. Advanced voting begins November 2nd. That’s when in person, satellite voting begins and November 7th Election Day. Again, tonight’s debate will be posted later this week on kmw.org, and thank you so much for coming.

  • Wichita economic development incentives discussed

    At today’s meeting of the Wichita city council, economic development incentives were a topic of discussion.

    In his remarks, Wichita Mayor Carl Brewer ignores evidence that targeted economic development incentives — the type being considered — don’t produce economic growth for the community. He also expresses his disdain for free market concepts and those who believe in them.

    It was a bad day for economic freedom in Wichita. Not a single council member voted in favor of economic freedom over corporate welfare.

    Related: Wichita targeted economic development should end, Wichita Warren Theater IRB a TIF district in disguise.

  • 2011: The Year in Review

    Following is a selection of stories that appeared on Voice for Liberty in 2011. Was it a good or bad year for the causes of economic freedom, individual liberty, limited government, free markets, and civil society?

    January

    Kansas: business-friendly or capitalism-friendly? While Kansas Republicans want to create a business-friendly environment, we have to be watchful for harmful crony, or false, capitalism.

    In Wichita, start of a solution to federal spending. A stand taken by a Sedgwick County Commissioner could pave the way to control of federal spending and debt.

    Wichita Mayor Carl Brewer: State of the City 2011. This week Wichita Mayor Carl Brewer delivered his annual “State of the City” address. While the Wichita Eagle editorial commenting on the mayor’s speech is titled “Cause to boast, hope,” a look at some of the important topics the mayor addressed will lead some to conclude otherwise.

    Charles and David Koch v. George Soros: Free markets or not. The protests surrounding a conference of free-market advocates reveal the political left’s misunderstanding of the relationship between business and government, and between freedom and coercion.

    February

    Regulation helps big business, not free enterprise. Both Democrats and Republicans love creating regulations, and big business loves these regulations.

    Kansas auto dealers have anti-competitive law on their side. Kansas automobile dealers benefit from a law that limits the ability of competitors to form new dealerships.

    Affordable Airfares audit embarrassing to Wichita. An audit of Affordable Airfares produced by the Kansas Legislative Division of Post Audit is an embarrassment to City of Wichita elected officials and staff, the Kansas Regional Area Economic Partnership, and the Wichita State University Center for Economic Development and Business Research.

    Wichita should reform its economic development strategy. Wichita can start moving towards an environment that promotes diverse economic growth by voting against targeted economic development incentives on today’s agenda. But if the council decides to approve each item, I would ask that the council identify specific spending somewhere else to cut, so that the cost of these programs are not spread among all the residents and businesses in the city.

    KNEA, the Kansas teachers union, open to reform? Do the teachers unions in Kansas, particularly Kansas National Education Association (KNEA), have the best interests of schoolchildren as their primary goal?

    March

    Charles G. Koch: Why Koch Industries is speaking out. In today’s Wall Street Journal, Charles G. Koch, who is chairman of the board and CEO of Koch Industries, writes that economic freedom — not government spending and intervention — leads to prosperity and economic well-being for all, even for our poorest citizens.

    Speculators selfishly provide a public service. Speculators are selfish people, acting only to make as much profit as possible for themselves without concern for the welfare of others. By doing so, they provide a valuable public service.

    Because arts are important, government funding should be avoided. The more important to our culture we believe the arts to be, the stronger the case for getting government out of its funding.

    KPERS problems must be confronted. This week the Kansas Legislature may work on the problems facing the Kansas Public Employee Retirement System, or KPERS. Past legislatures have failed to enact reforms necessary to put this system on a sound financial footing, and the legislature has shown itself incapable of managing a system where it’s easy to pass on the problem to future generations. Now Kansas faces an unfunded liability of some $9.3 billion in KPERS. The most important thing the state can do is to stop enrolling new employees in this failing system.

    Weekly Standard: The left’s obsession with the Koch brothers. Matthew Continetti of the Weekly Standard has written a profile of Charles and David Koch and Koch Industries, focusing on politics and the attacks by the political Left. A key passage in the story explains what those who believe in economic freedom have known all along: If Charles and David Koch really wanted to make a lot of money for themselves, they would act like most corporations: seek fortune through government intervention, not through competition in free markets.

    Sedgwick County Commission to consider corporate welfare as economic development. The Sedgwick County Commission will consider embracing corporate welfare as its economic development strategy.

    April

    Wichita elections a blow for economic freedom. The victory by Wichita Mayor Carl Brewer and other city council members means a win for crony capitalism and a loss for economic freedom in Wichita.

    Reisman: Social Security, Medicare must end. The institutions of Social Security and Medicare have replaced individualism with reliance on a collective fraud.

    Liberals and economic knowledge. Who might you guess is better informed on issues of economics: liberals who promote government intervention in the economy, or conservatives and libertarians who oppose it?

    Hazlitt’s ‘Economics in One Lesson’ relevant today. Economics In One Lesson, first published in 1946 and recently reissued by the Ludwig von Mises Institute, explains fallacies (false or mistaken ideas) that are particularly common in the field of economics and public policy.

    Kansas Chamber finds voters favor cuts, not tax increases to balance budget. A survey of Kansas voters conducted on behalf of the Kansas Chamber of Commerce found widespread support for cutting spending rather than raising taxes as the way to balance the Kansas budget. Support was also found for cutting state worker salaries, or reducing the number of state employees.

    May

    Forgivable loan a test for new Wichita City Council members. This week three new members of the Wichita City Council have a chance to live up to — or not — their campaign rhetoric.

    In Kansas, school choice programs could help the most needy students achieve. School choice programs in Kansas could help close the gap between low-performing students and the rest, according to the Kansas Policy Institute.

    In Kansas Legislature this year, opportunities for saving were lost. This year the Kansas Legislature lost three opportunities to improve the operations and reduce the cost of state government. Three bills, each with this goal, were passed by the House of Representatives, but each failed to make through the Senate, or had its contents stripped and replaced with different legislation.

    Pickens criticism illustrates divide between free markets and intervention. Criticism by energy investor T. Boone Pickens of U.S. Representative Mike Pompeo and Koch Industries continues to illustrate the difference between those who believe in economic freedom and free markets, and those — like Pickens — who invest in politicians, bureaucrats, and the hope of a government subsidy.

    Kansas needs truth about schools. Kansas needs an honest assessment of the performance of its schools from education commissioner Diane M. DeBacker.

    June

    For Wichita, Save-A-Lot teaches a lesson. The announcement that a Save-A-Lot grocery store will proceed — contrary to the claims of developers and city staff who rely on their information — should provide a lesson that yes, economic development in Wichita can and will happen without public assistance.

    Wichita and its political class. Discussion at a Wichita City Council meeting provided an opportunity for citizens to discover the difference in the thinking of the political class and those who value limited government and capitalism.

    Huelskamp at RightOnline: Debt is the problem. At the RightOnline conference in Minneapolis, U.S. Representative Tim Huelskamp of the Kansas first district told the general session audience that federal spending and debt is a threat to the future of America, and that we must use the opportunity of the upcoming debt ceiling vote to force spending cuts.

    Economist: Kansas must improve its competitive position. Kansas needs to implement pro-growth economic policies or face mediocrity and stagnation, says economist Jonathan Williams of the Rich States, Poor States report.

    Economic freedom leads to better lives for all, says video. Economic freedom, in countries where it is allowed to thrive, leads to better lives for people as measured in a variety of ways. This is true for everyone, especially for poor people.

    Corporate jet incentive, or tax dodge, or kids’ safety?. Although President Obama’s demagoguery is mistargeted, it would be a good idea to get rid of preferential tax treatment in all cases.

    July

    Wichita school board: critics not welcome. A recent meeting of the board of USD 259, the Wichita public school district, provided insight as to the insularity of the board members and district staff, and as to how little meaningful discussion or debate takes place at board meetings.

    Kansas jobs creation numbers in perspective. The administration of Kansas Governor Sam Brownback announced job creation figures that, on the surface, sound like good news. But before we celebrate too much, we need to place the job numbers in context and look at the larger picture, specifically whether these economic development wins are good for the Kansas economy.

    Federal grants seen to raise future local spending. Not only are we taxed to pay for the cost of funding federal and state grants, the units of government that receive grants are very likely to raise their own levels of taxation in response to the receipt of the grants. This is a cycle of ever-expanding government that needs to end, and right now.

    Sedgwick County considers a federal grant. While most people think the problem of government over-spending requires a top-down solution starting in Washington, we have to do better than waiting for Washington to act.

    Despite subsidy program, Wichita flights are declining. Supporters of the Kansas Affordable Airfares Program are proud of the program’s success. But looking at the statistics uncovers a troubling trend that is obscured by the facts used to promote the program.

    Pickens: It’s all about me, and MSNBC doesn’t notice. Appearing on the MSNBC morning program Morning Joe, energy investor T. Boone Pickens let us know that despite his no-nonsense business-like approach to supporting what he believes to be in America’s best interests, it’s really all about him and what profits him.

    Wichita school district able to maintain employment ratios. Despite the claims that schools have made drastic cuts, evidence shows that USD 259, the Wichita public school district, has been able to maintain student-employee ratios.

    Clusters as economic development in Kansas. Is the promotion by Kansas government of industry clusters as economic development good for the future of Kansas?

    Tax expenditures, or loopholes. Tax expenditures, commonly called loopholes, are in the news as part of the debt ceiling negotiations. What is the true nature of these? Spending, or not?

    August

    Job creation at young firms declines. A new report by the Kauffman Foundation holds unsettling information for the future of job growth in the United States.

    U.S. receipts and expenditures. A look at the recent history of U.S. receipts and expenditures holds useful lessons on taxes and spending.

    Wichita City Council bows to special interests. Yesterday’s meeting of the Wichita City Council revealed a council — except for one member — totally captured by special interests, to the point where the council, aided by city staff, used a narrow legal interpretation in order to circumvent a statutorily required public hearing process.

    Wichita Mayor Carl Brewer to critics: stop grandstanding. A meeting of the Wichita City Council provided a window into the attitude of Wichita elected officials, particularly Mayor Carl Brewer. Through their actions, and by their words, we see a government that cares little for the rule of law and good government, and one that is disrespectful to citizens who call attention to this.

    Pay-to-play laws are needed in Wichita and Kansas. In the wake of scandals, some states and cities have passed “pay-to-play” laws. These laws often prohibit political campaign contributions by those who seek government contracts, or the laws may impose special disclosure requirements. But Wichita and Kansas have no such laws.

    Intrust Bank Arena depreciation expense ignored. Reports that income earned by the Intrust Bank Arena is down sharply has brought the arena’s finances back into the news. The arena, located in downtown Wichita and owned by Sedgwick County, is deemed to be a success by the county and arena boosters based on “profit” figures generated during its first year of operations. But these numbers are not an honest assessment of the arena’s financial performance.

    ‘Honest services’ law expansion sought. While the U.S. Supreme Court has attempted to limit the application of vague “honest services” statutes, the Obama Administration is working to restore what the Wall Street Journal describes as “essentially unlimited prosecutorial discretion to bring white-collar cases.”

    In Wichita, historic preservation tax credits an inefficient form of developer welfare. As part of the subsidy plan for Douglas Place, a downtown Wichita hotel being proposed, developers plan to make extensive use of historic preservation tax credits to fund their project. This form of developer welfare, besides being inefficient, is largely hidden from public view.

    For Wichita’s Project Downtown, goal keeps slipping. In selling a plan for the revitalization of downtown Wichita, promoters started with a promise of much private investment for just a little public investment. But as the plan proceeded, the goal kept slipping, and the first project to be approved under the final plan will probably not come close to meeting even the modest goals set by the Wichita City Council.

    September

    Walter Williams: Government must stick to its limited and legitimate role. Economist Walter E. Williams spoke on the legitimate role of government in a free society, touching on the role of government as defined in the Constitution, the benefits of capitalism and private property, and the recent attacks on individual freedom and limited government.

    In Wichita, private tax policy on the rise. In a free society with a limited government, taxation should be restricted to being a way for government to raise funds to pay for services that all people benefit from. But in the city of Wichita, private tax policy is overtaking our city.

    Free market energy solutions don’t jeopardize national security. Free market energy solutions don’t jeopardize national security, write U.S. Representatives Mike Pompeo and Jeff Flake.

    The resolve of the Wichita City Council. Despite her assessment of the will of the people of Wichita, The Wichita Eagle’s Rhonda Holman encourages the Wichita City Council to stick to its guns and do the opposite.

    At Wichita City Council, facts are in dispute. Some Wichita City Council members, including Mayor Carl Brewer, criticize citizens for their use of inaccurate and misleading information. So how do the statements made by council members fare when subjected to scrutiny?

    Kansas needs pro-growth policies. A theme of Kansas Governor Sam Brownback when he spoke in Wichita this week was jobs and opportunities, and how Kansas needs pro-growth policies to break out of a slump.

    Kansas school spending: the deception. Kansas school spending advocates like Mark Desetti of the Kansas National Education Association (KNEA) use only a small portion of school spending when making presentations, letting them be accurate and deceptive at the same time.

    Sedgwick County considers a planning grant. Sedgwick County’s consideration of a federal planning grant raised a host of issues, including buying in to the Obama Administration agenda and the roles and relationships of federal and local governments.

    October

    Ken-Mar TIF district, the bailouts. Circumstances surrounding the Ken-Mar shopping center in northeast Wichita illustrate how inappropriate it is for the city to serve as either entrepreneur or partner with entrepreneurs, and is another lesson in how Wichita needs pay-to-play laws.

    Pompeo at Pachyderm on economy, budget. U. S. Representative Mike Pompeo of Wichita addressed members and guests of the Wichita Pachyderm Club, with members interested in the economy and budget issues.

    Wichita city council: substance and process. The Wichita City Council and city hall bureaucrats have shown that they are willing to follow the letter of the law, but following the spirit and substance of the law, especially regarding public hearings and citizen involvement, remains a challenge for the city.

    Kansas and its own Solyndra. At this moment, we can’t say that Kansas has its own version of Solyndra, the subsidized and politically-connected solar energy firm that recently shut down its operations and declared bankruptcy. But as far as absorbing the important lessons from Solyndra, we may have another chance to learn them in Kansas.

    The politically-motivated attack on Koch Industries. The more scrutiny the Bloomberg article attacking Koch Industries receives, the worse it looks.

    Intellectuals against the people and their freedoms. Why are so many opposed to private property and free exchange — capitalism, in other words — in favor of large-scale government interventionism? Lack of knowledge, or ignorance, is one answer, but there is another.

    Economic freedom in America: The decline, and what it means. The decline in economic freedom in the U.S. leads to slow growth in the private sector economy and persistently high unemployment.

    Wichita economic development: And then what will happen? Critics of the economic development policies in use by the City of Wichita are often portrayed as not being able to see and appreciate the good things these policies are producing, even though they are unfolding right before our very eyes. The difference is that some look beyond the immediate — what is seen — and ask “And then what will happen?” — looking for the unseen.

    Kerpen on Obama’s regulatory extremism. A new book details the ways that President Obama is bypassing Congress and the will of the people in order to implement his extreme radical agenda.

    Kansas schools need diversity and dynamism to engage students. Kansas schools need to be much more dynamic and diverse in order to meet students’ needs and effectively engage them in learning. But the lack of school choice and charter schools in Kansas means that Kansas children are missing opportunities for learning that are present in some states. Until Kansas changes its educational policies, it is unlikely that schools will see any significant improvement.

    ‘Sustainable planning’ not so sustainable. The vast majority of Americans, surveys say, aspire to live in a single-family home with a yard. The vast majority of American trave — around 85 percent — is by automobile. Yet the Obama administration thinks more Americans should live in apartments and travel on foot, bicycle, or mass transit.

    November

    School choice savings not being considered in Kansas. According to the reporting surrounding the revision of the Kansas school finance formula, Kansas is overlooking a sure way to save money and improve Kansas schools: widespread school choice.

    Huelskamp on spending, health information database, and Buffett. Addressing members and guests of the Wichita Pachyderm Club last Friday, U.S. Representative Tim Huelskamp of the Kansas first district updated the audience on national spending and debt, a health information database that poses privacy risks, and Warren Buffett’s taxes.

    Focus on Kansas school funding formula is a distraction. As Kansas struggles with a formula for financing schools, we’re losing an opportunity to examine our schools and see if they’re performing as well as they should, both financially and academically

    Supercommittee fails at tiny goal. The failure of the Congressional Supercommittee to meet such a small and modest goal is not good news, as the real problems are much larger.

    Wichita property taxes are high, leading to other problems. High business property taxes in Wichita cause officials to take an “active investor” role in economic development, despite evidence that this approach does not work.

    TIF and other subsidies harm Wichita. Everyone who cares about Wichita — the entire city, not just special interests — ought to be opposed to the continued use of tax increment financing (TIF) districts and other forms of subsidy that direct benefits to a small group at the expense of everyone else.

    Kansas PEAK program: corporate welfare wrapped in obfuscation. Many economic development programs, such as the Kansas Promoting Employment Across Kansas (PEAK) program, are surrounded by confusion that hides the economic reality of the transactions.

    December

    Kansas gas storage regulation might not improve safety. Should Kansans be relieved that government regulation and inspection of underground natural gas storage may be resumed soon?

    Wichita should reject tax increment financing. Wichita should reject tax increment financing for the good of the entire city.

    Wichita City Council sets hotel tax election date. Discussion of setting an election date provided another example reinforcing the realization that Wichita has a city council — with the exception of one member — that is entirely captured by special interests.

    In Wichita, disdain for open records and government transparency. Despite receiving nearly all its funding from taxpayers, Go Wichita Convention and Visitors Bureau refuses to admit it is a “public agency” as defined in the Kansas Open Records Act. The city backs this agency and its interpretation of this law, which is in favor of government secrecy and in opposition to the letter and spirit of the Open Records Act.

    Wichita falls in economic performance ranking. The City of Wichita has fallen in a ranking of the performance of its economy, according to the Milkin Institute.

  • Chemical security act could affect Wichita water rates

    The United States Congress is considering legislation that aims to increase the security of America’s chemical industry to terrorism threats. The legislation, if passed, would require chemical companies to substitute government-mandated processes and technology for their current processes. The post Chemical security law goes beyond protection explains more about this legislation.

    Even places that we might not consider to be “chemical plants” could fall under this act.

    The Center for American Progress — described by Wikipedia as “a liberal political policy research and advocacy organization,” an understatement if there ever was one — has produced a report titled Chemical Security 101: What You Don’t Have Can’t Leak, or Be Blown Up by Terrorists.

    The Wichita Water Treatment Plant appears on their list of 202 additional facilities that should be required to change their processes, according to the report. The Wichita plant appears because it uses chlorine to treat drinking water, and, apparently, because it’s located in a large city.

    I asked David Warren, Director of Utilities for the City of Wichita, about the proposed legislation and about the Wichita Water Treatment Plant being on a list of dangerous facilities.

    While declining — understandably so — to discuss specifics of security at the Wichita plant, he said that if the legislation passes and is found to apply to Wichita’s plant, “it would require expensive changes in our treatment process.”

    He also said that the reason for the Wichita plant’s inclusion on the list is due to its location (near the center of Wichita) rather than to any defect in security precautions.

    It would be one thing if these changes were necessary and would contribute to national security. But Congressional testimony found that the legislation could actually increase risk to the businesses that the bill intends to protect.

    Wichita water rates are already on the rise as the city undertakes capital improvement projects. It’s unknown how much bills might increase if the water plant was forced to make changes to its treatment technology.

    But even slight increase can cause hardship. Last year Wichita city council member Lavonta Williams expressed concern that a $1 per month increase in water bills would be a hardship. And in her campaign last year, she stated “We need to start the conversation with service providers about whether we can offer laid-off workers reduced rates for water, heat and other essential services.”

  • Economist: Kansas must improve its competitive position

    Last week the American Legislative Exchange Council released the fourth edition of Rich States, Poor States: The ALEC-Laffer Economic Competitiveness Index. This is an important study by authors Arthur B. Laffer, Stephen Moore, and Jonathan Williams that identifies states that use “best practices to enable states to drive economic growth, create jobs, and improve the standard of living for their citizens.” On Friday Williams was in Wichita and spoke to a group of business and political leaders at an event sponsored by Kansas Policy Institute and Wichita Independent Business Association.

    Williams said that there is reason for optimism in Kansas, but the news is not all good for our state. ALEC calculates economic outlook rankings, which is a “forecast based on a state’s current standing in 15 policy variables, each of which is influenced directly by state lawmakers through the legislative process, looking at states’ forecast for growth. In this ranking, Kansas fell from 25th to 27th among the 50 states in one year. A lot of this, Williams said, was due to the statewide sales tax increase of one cent per dollar which took effect on July 1, 2010. That will “leave a mark on competitiveness,” he added.

    Williams praised a bill in the Kansas Legislature this year which would have used increases in tax revenue to buy down the income tax rate. That bill, SB 1, known as the March to Economic Growth Act, passed the House of Representatives but did not advance out of committee in the Senate. This bill was important, Williams said, as one of the key findings of the Rich States, Poor States report is how important low income taxes are for economic growth.

    Kansas has a choice to make, Williams told the audience. Kansas could become a growth state like Texas, which has gained four Congressional seats over the last ten years. (Kansas has four seats. States gain Congressional seats when they grow in population more rapidly than other states.) Also, according to co-author Stephen Moore, Texas has created 40 percent of all jobs created during the recent economic recovery. Moore attributes part of Texas’ growth to having no personal income tax and living within its means.

    The other course is for Kansas to become accustomed to its mediocre, middle-of-the-pack ranking. But we may not want to live with the loss or prosperity that comes with this ranking. Williams cited research by KPI that show that Kansas was the only state to have a net loss of private sector jobs over the last year. All other states had at least some job growth.

    In ranking states on economic outlook, three of our our neighboring states — Colorado (number 6), Missouri (9), and Oklahoma (14) are in the top 15 states. This, said Williams, makes Kansas’ mediocre ranking of 27th look even worse.

    Williams outlined some principles that lead to effective tax policy. First, taxes ought to be simple. Complicated tax systems require much effort and cost to comply with, and are a deadweight loss to the economy.

    Transparency is important. It should be clear who is paying the tax. Williams said that business taxes violate this principle, as businesses pass on taxes to customers, employees, and investors.

    Neutrality — not using tax policy to select winners and lowers — is important, as government has a terrible record of success, and it leads to corruption in the manner of choosing winners.

    Predictability is important, and institutional controls like the taxpayer bill of rights or a super majority requirement to raise taxes help in this regard.

    Finally, tax policies must be pro-growth.

    Williams also said that increasing spending is not a good answer to economic problems. The ARRA (federal stimulus program of 2009) allowed states to live beyond their means for two years, and the money had many strings attached. Maintenance of effort requirements forced states to abandon good budgeting practices, and set states up to fail once the stimulus money stopped. In Kansas, the budget shortfall at the start of the legislative session in January was about $550 billion, and most of that was due to the end of the stimulus money.

    In analyzing tax policy, Williams told of how many people insist on using static analysis to predict the outcome of changes to tax policy. He showed the famous Laffer Curve, made prominent by co-author Arthur Laffer. The concepts illustrated by the curve include these: At an income tax rate of zero, the government collects no tax revenue. At a tax rate of 100 percent, again the government collects no revenue, as no one will work if all their earnings go to taxes. Between these two rates, revenue will rise as the tax rate is increased, until at some point tax revenue begins to fall with increasing tax rates. Eventually people figure out it just doesn’t pay to work any longer after the tax rate becomes too high.

    It’s important, therefore, to include human behavior and reaction to changes in tax policy. This is dynamic analysis — realizing that as tax rates change, people alter their behavior. Static analysis, on the other hand, doesn’t take this into account. Williams recounted an example as told in the book Flat Tax Revolution: Using a Postcard to Abolish the IRS by Steve Forbes:

    In 1989, Bob Packwood (R-OR) requested a revenue forecast from Congress’s Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT) on a hypothetical tax increase raising the top rate to 100 percent on incomes over $200,000. The JCT responded by forecasting increased revenues of $204 billion in 1990 and $299 billion in 1993. Essentially, the JCT predicted that people would continue to work even if the government taxed them out of every penny they earned.

    Williams said that only about ten states use a method of analysis different from static analysis when considering tax policy changes. Therefore, pro-growth tax policies often don’t get a good revenue score and are rejected for that reason. But the static models don’t take into account that as tax rates decrease, revenue may increase, or not decline as much as static models predict.

    On the state pension crisis, Williams said that official estimates understate the magnitude of the actual problem, as government accounting standards do not require states to fully recognize the full magnitude of recent investment losses. The losses may be spread over several years. Further, he said that states generally use an assumed rate of return that is greater than what is likely to be realized. He said that legendary investor Warren Buffet has recommended that state use six percent as their future earnings assumption. Kansas uses eight percent. Over long periods of time, which is the timeframe of pension plans, this difference in returns produces a large change in earnings.

    For more information on this report and its findings for Kansas, see Rich States, Poor States released for 2011. The report is available to read in its entirety at no cost at Rich States, Poor States: The ALEC-Laffer Economic Competitiveness Index.

  • Supply-side economics, instead of taxes, is cure for recession

    From April, 2010.

    Sound money and income tax cuts — the elements of supply-side economics — have produced economic growth in America, according to Dr. Brian Domitrovic of Sam Houston State University. When our country imposes inflationary loose money policies and high income taxes, economic growth suffers, as in the period from 1973 to 1982. Unfortunately, these are the policies of President Barack Obama and his administration.

    Domitrovic lectured on principles in his book Econoclasts: The Rebels Who Sparked the Supply-Side Revolution and Restored American Prosperity last night at Friends University. His lecture was part of the Law, Liberty & the Market lecture series, which is underwritten by the Fred C. and Mary R. Koch Foundation in Wichita.

    “Unemployment at nine percent, five grueling quarters of decline in GDP growth, the stock market snapped back from its horrid 50 percent decline, but still needing a good 25 percent to get back to its old high: this has been some economic contraction.” While this may sound like a description of the current recession, it’s not. Instead, Domitrovic was describing the recession of 1974 and 1975. The stagflation period from 1973 to 1982, characterized by both high unemployment and high inflation, was a dark period in American history.

    There was also a mortgage and foreclosure crisis during that decade, but it affected the most prudent homeowners the worst. Property taxes in California went up five-fold in a period of ten years. Selling your house resulted in the loss of half your equity because of the capital gains taxes that were in effect then.

    While unemployment is high today, inflation is low, with prices even declining slightly last year. Being unemployed while prices are rising at nine percent per year — or 33 percent during one two-year period — is much worse than being unemployed today.

    In 1980 the bank prime interest rate reached 22%. (It’s 3.25% today.) It was impossible to save money in the 1970s, as the real tax rates on saving exceeded one hundred percent.

    Our economic crisis today is the “junior partner” to the stagflation decade. Our current political leaders should not be comparing the current situation to the Great Depression of the 1930s. Instead, the stagflation period has better lessons to teach us. It took 20 years for American living standards to recover to the level attained before the Great Depression started, Domitrovic told the audience, so we should not implement the same policies in response to the current recession.

    Instead, we have a fairly recent crisis — the stagflation period — which was solved “so firmly, so efficiently, so permanently” that the quarter-century following this period is known as the “Great Moderation.” There was economic growth year after year, inflation nearly vanished, unemployment was low, interest rates settled, businesses started, and stocks and bonds boomed.

    It was supply-side economics that ended the stagflation and lead to the long period of prosperity, the Great Moderation. Failing to embrace supply-side economics as a response to the economic problems that arose in 2008 was one of our greatest mistakes.

    As the current crisis enters its third year, we should not be surprised that recovery is slow to arrive. “Tepid and incomplete recovery was, in fact, the record of the New Deal, which our policymakers have looked to for inspiration,” Domitrovic explained.

    Supply-side economics consists of stable money and marginal tax cuts. These are the policies that defeated stagflation and lead to the Great Moderation.

    Domitrovic explained that in 1913, two great institutions of macroeconomic management were created, the Federal Reserve system and the income tax. Prior to this time, the United States had no ability to conduct macroeconomic policy, either fiscal or monetary policy.

    Since 1913, the economic history of the U.S. has been that of “serial disaster.” From 1913 to 1919, prices increased by 100 percent. Prior to that, there had never a peacetime inflation in the U.S. The top rate of the income tax, which started at a rate of seven percent, had increased to 77 percent by 1917. From 1919 to 1921, the U.S. experienced its worse recession up to that time. Unemployment rose to 18 percent. Prior to this time, unemployment was not a problem.

    The fix was President Warren Harding’s Treasury Secretary Andrew Mellon telling the Federal Reserve to keep the dollar stable instead of trying to manipulate the price level, and the income tax rate was cut by two-thirds. As a result, from 1921 to 1929 inflation was low, less than one percent, and that nation experienced the boom known as the Roaring Twenties. Economic progress boomed.

    But in 1929, the Federal Reserve started to deflate the currency in an attempt to get prices back to the 1913 level. In 1932 the top income tax rate was raised to 63 percent from 25 percent. “There you have the Great Depression,” Domitrovic said. It was a crisis of macroeconomic management, not a failure of capitalism, as is commonly believed.

    Franklin Roosevelt instructed the Federal Reserve to keep the price level steady, which was one good policy he implemented. But he increased income tax rates.

    In 1947 income tax rates were cut and the Federal Reserve pursued stable prices after the inflation of World War II.

    A pattern emerged: stable prices coupled with income tax cuts lead to recovery. When these policies are not applied, recovery was weak and collapsed. These patterns repeated through the rest of the century.

    During the Eisenhower Administration, the top tax rate was 91 percent. Eisenhower refused to cut taxes, and there were three recessions during his presidency.

    John F. Kennedy wanted to solve the crisis. His advisors told him to loosen money and raise taxes, even though the top marginal rate was 91 percent. The idea, according to recently-deceased economist and Kennedy adviser Paul Samuelson, was that by increasing the money supply people would spend money, which would cause production to increase and workers to be hired. But increasing the money supply produces inflationary pressures. The solution was very high income tax rates, which sops up the extra money that causes inflation.

    But Robert Mundell, only 29 years old at the time, wrote a memo that advised the opposite, advocating stable money and low taxes. Kennedy adopted this policy, and a great boom resulted for seven years.

    But Lyndon Johnson asked his Federal Reserve Chairman to increase the money supply, and passed an income tax surcharge to attempt to control the danger of inflation — the “neoclassical synthesis.” Inflation rose. Nixon increased the capital gains tax and established the alternative minimum tax. The result was the double-dip recession of 1969 to 1970, which cost more in economic output than the cost of the entire Viet Nam war.

    Still, the Federal Reserve kept increasing the money supply, and the income tax rate was increased. Nixon insisted that printing money would save the economy, and in order to control inflation, Nixon imposed price controls. The result was an investment strike. If businesses could not charge the prices they needed, they would enter other fields of businesses, such as commodities. The prices of commodities rose rapidly, and there was the terrible double-dip recession of 1974 to 1975.

    Mundell, along with Robert Bartley of the Wall Street Journal and others, started to encourage government to tighten the money supply and lower taxes. At the same time United States Representative Jack Kemp introduced a bill calling for a large tax cut and stable money. Kemp’s bill passed both houses of Congress with a veto-proof majority. But Jimmy Carter had it killed in committee.

    If not for Carter’s action, the Kemp-Roth tax cuts would have become law in November 1978. These tax cuts, had they been passed and been coupled with Carter’s appointment of Paul Volcker — an advocate of stable money — as chairman of the Federal Reserve in August 1979, would have found the policy elements of “Reaganomics” in place at that time. Domitrovic said the economy would have recovered rapidly, and it is likely that Ronald Reagan would not have run for president in 1980.

    Instead, the period from 1979 to 1981 was a brutal period of economic history, with high unemployment, high inflation, and tanking markets.

    Upon entering office, Reagan was able to implement sound money policy and tax cuts — by then called supply-side economics — and the economy started the boom that lasted for 25 years. During this time there was only one recession, in 1990 and 1991. This is in contrast to the three recessions during Eisenhower’s eight years in office.

    Supply-side economics is one of the greatest success stories in economics and government, Domitrovic said. Despite evidence of its success, despite the fact that every objection to it has collapsed, policymakers did not follow its policies in 2008. Objections to supply-side economics that have proven to be unfounded include:

    It is inflationary. This is the basis for George H.W. Bush’s characterization of supply-side economics as “voodoo” economics. But inflation since 1982 has been very low.

    It would cause crowding-out. This refers to the fact that tax cuts can cause budget deficits, and the government would have to borrow so much money that none would be available for private business investment. But the 1980s, 1990s, and 2000s were a period of historic expansion, with the Dow Jones stock market average increasing by a factor of 15 during this time.

    Government debt is a burden to future generations. But the nation experienced great prosperity and economic expansion during the Great Moderation, and interest payments on the debt were not a major burden.

    Tax cuts would place the U.S. in a “fiscal hole,” with budget deficits forever. But by the 1990s we were running budget surpluses. Domitrovic said that when Clinton balanced the budget in 2000, the total level of government expenditure was 18.4 percent of gross domestic product. In Reagan’s last year in office (1989) revenues were 18.4 percent of GDP. “In other words, Reagan’s tax policy plus Clinton’s spending policy was exactly sufficient for a perfectly balanced budget.”

    Supply-side economics causes inequality. But Domitrovic said that tax cuts mean that wealthy people don’t have to hide their income from taxes, making their income more productive publicly. Inequality has decreased.

    Summarizing, Domitrovic told the audience that the lessons of the Great Moderation are that when the institutions of 1913 — Federal Reserve and the income tax — are tamed, the American economy does wonderful things. Stable money and low taxes, combined with the entrepreneurial knack of Americans, produces remarkable economic growth and job opportunities. But when the macroeconomic institutions of 1913 run a muck the economy will suffer. The current policies of the Obama Administration — loose money and rising taxes — are not going to produce prosperity.

  • Wichita city council to decide between rule of law, or rule by situation

    Tuesday’s Wichita City Council meeting will provide an opportunity for the mayor, council members, and city hall staff to let Wichitans know if our city is governed by the rule of law and proper respect for it, or if these values will be discarded for the convenience of one person and his business partners.

    Here’s the situation: a person wants to gain approval of a tax increment financing (TIF) district project plan. This requires a public hearing, which the city has scheduled for September 13th.

    But this schedule doesn’t suit the applicant. He has a personal business need — an expiring purchase option — and wants the city to issue a letter of intent stating that the city intends to do all the things that are the subject of the September public hearing.

    The letter of intent is not binding, city officials tell us. The council will still have to hold the September public hearing and vote on the incentives the developer wants. And the list of incentives is large, amounting to many millions of dollars. Whether to issue these incentives deserves discussion and a public hearing.

    But the letter of intent, in effect, circumvents the public hearing. It reduces the hearing to a meaningless exercise. No matter what information is presented at the September public hearing, no matter how strong public opinion might be against this project, is there any real likelihood that the council would not proceed with this plan and its incentives, having already passed a letter of intent to do so? I imagine that persuasive arguments will be made that since the city issued a letter of intent, and since the developers may have already taken action based on that letter, it follows that the city is obligated to pass the plan. Otherwise, who would ever vest any meaning in a future letter of intent from this city?

    And the developers are planning to take action based on this letter of intent. To them, the letter does have meaning. If it had no meaning, why would they ask for it?

    That bears repeating: If the letter of intent is non-binding, why issue it at all?

    The last time someone felt the city reneged on a letter of intent, it resulted in a court case that went all the way to the Kansas Supreme Court. I imagine the city is not anxious to repeat that experience.

    Part of the purpose of public hearings and their advance notice, usually 30 days or so, is to give interested parties time to prepare for the hearing. But citizens are given just a few days notice of the proposed letter of intent. The parties who will receive the subsidies, of course, have known about this for some time. Their bureaucratic and political enablers have, too.

    The issuance of the letter of intent on Tuesday, if the city council decides to do so, is an affront to the rule of law. It would be a powerful statement by the council that it intends to go ahead with the project and its subsides, public hearing — and citizens — be damned. It is a striking show of arrogance by the city and its political leadership, which is to say Mayor Carl Brewer.

    After Tuesday’s meeting we will know one thing. We will know if the Wichita City Council and city staff value the rule of law more than the needs of one small group of people. We won’t really know about individual city staff, but the council members and mayor will have to vote on this item. We’ll know exactly where each of them stands. Expect waffling.

    Tuesday provides citizens a chance to learn exactly how the mayor and each council members value the rule of law as compared to the needs of one person and his business partners. It is as simple as that.

    The project

    The project is the development of a new hotel in an existing building downtown. It sounds like a neat project and would be a great addition to Wichita. But — this project is a product of central government planning backed by massive government intervention in the form of millions of dollars of subsidy. Pretty much all the tools have been tapped in the proposed corporate welfare, even one form that will require the city to pass a special charter ordinance.

    The lead developer, David Burk, is well known in Wichita and has produced a number of successful projects. (We must qualify this as “seemingly successful,” as it seems as all of Burk’s projects require some sort of taxpayer involvement and subsidy. So we don’t really know if these projects would be successful if they had to stand on their own.)

    I’ve written extensively on the problems with government-directed planning and taxpayer-funded investment in downtown Wichita. See Downtown Wichita regulations on subsidy to be considered or Downtown Wichita revitalization for examples. This project suffers from all these problems.

    Furthermore, we see the problems of the public choice theory of politics at play here. Perhaps most prominent is the problem of concentrated benefits and dispersed costs. In this case Burk and his partners stand to garner tremendous benefit, while everyone else pays. This is why Burk and his wife are generous campaign donors to both conservative and liberal city politicians.

    Burk and past allegations

    The involvement of Burk in the project, along with the city’s response, is problematic. City documents indicate that the city has investigated the backgrounds of the applicants for this project. The result is “no significant findings to report.” Evidently the city didn’t look very hard. In February 2010 the Wichita Eagle reported on the activities of David Burk with regard to property he owns in Old Town. Citizens reading these articles might have been alarmed at the actions of Burk. Certainly some city hall politicians and bureaucrats were.

    The opening sentence of the Wichita Eagle article (Developer appealed taxes on city-owned property) raises the main allegation against Burk: “Downtown Wichita’s leading developer, David Burk, represented himself as an agent of the city — without the city’s knowledge or consent — to cut his taxes on publicly owned property he leases in the Old Town Cinema Plaza, according to court records and the city attorney.”

    A number of Wichita city hall officials were not pleased with Burk’s act.

    According to the Eagle reporting, Burk was not authorized to do what he did: “Officials in the city legal department said that while Burk was within his rights to appeal taxes on another city-supported building in the Cinema Plaza, he did not have authorization to file an appeal on the city-owned parking/retail space he leases. … As for Burk signing documents as the city’s representative, ‘I do have a problem with it,’ said City Attorney Gary Rebenstorf, adding that he intends to investigate further.”

    Council member Jeff Longwell was quoted by the Eagle: “‘We should take issue with that,’ he said. ‘If anyone is going to represent the city they obviously have to have, one, the city’s endorsement and … two, someone at the city should have been more aware of what was going on. And if they were, shame on them for not bringing this to the public’s attention.’”

    Council member Lavonta Williams, now serving as vice mayor, was not pleased, either, according to her quotations: “‘Right now, it doesn’t look good,’ she said. ‘Are we happy about it? Absolutely not.’”

    In a separate article by the Eagle on this issue, we can learn of the reaction by two other city hall officials: “Vice Mayor Jim Skelton said that having city development partners who benefit from tax increment financing appeal for lower property taxes ‘seems like an oxymoron.’ City Manager Robert Layton said that anyone has the right to appeal their taxes, but he added that ‘no doubt that defeats the purpose of the TIF.’”

    The manager’s quote is most directly damaging. In a tax increment financing (TIF) district, the city borrows money to pay for things that directly enrich the developers, in this case Burk and possibly his partners. Then their increased property taxes — taxes they have to pay anyway — are used to repay the borrowed funds. In essence, a TIF district allows developers to benefit exclusively from their property taxes. For everyone else, their property taxes go to fund the city, county, school district, state, fire district, etc. But not so for property in a TIF district.

    This is what is most astonishing about Burk’s action: Having been placed in a rarefied position of receiving many millions in benefits, he still thinks his own taxes are too high.

    Some of Burk’s partners have a history of dealing with the city that is illustrative of their attitudes. In 2008 the Old Town Warren Theater was failing and its owners threatened to close it and leave the city with a huge loss on a TIF district formed for the theater’s benefit. Faced with this threat, the city made a no-interest and low-interest loan to the theater. The theater’s owners included David Wells, who is one of Burk’s partners in the project being considered by the council for the letter of intent.

    Entrepreneurs are not always successful. Business failure, if handled honestly and honorably, is not shameful.

    But when a business is already receiving taxpayer subsidy, and the response to failure is to demand even more from the taxpayer — that is shameful.

    Burk and Wells, by the way, played a role in the WaterWalk project, which has a well-deserved reputation as a failed development. In 2011 the city’s budget includes a loss of slightly over one million dollars for the TIF district that has benefited its owners to the tune of over $41 million.

    Burk has been personally enriched by city hall action before. An example from the same article: “A 2003 lease agreement gave Burk use of the retail strip at the front of the parking garage for $1 a year for the first five years.” Nearly-free property that you can then lease at market rates is a sweet deal.

    These gentlemen have had their bite at the taxpayer-funded apple. Now they want another bite, on their own schedule, without regard to rule of law and the public.

  • Kansas and Wichita quick takes: Wednesday September 28, 2011

    Obama’s intercontinental railroad. Burton Folsom notices a recent speech by President Barack Obama that mentioned how America built the “intercontinental railroad.” Folsom grants Obama some slack for the gaffe — we all make them, after all — and explains to readers the most important lesson that should be learned from our experience building the transcontinental railroad: “… the story of the transcontinental railroads really is a great teaching tool for today. If we study the Union Pacific, the Central Pacific, and the Northern Pacific Railroads, we learn they all went broke after receiving a combined total of 61 million acres of land. And they ran the nation deep into debt, too. … federal spending on transcontinentals meant corruption, land grabs, and wasted taxpayer dollars. But wait. The Great Northern Railroad, which went from St. Paul to Seattle, never went bankrupt and was one of the best-built railroads in the United States. Why did the Great Northern succeed when the others failed? Because James J. Hill, the president, built his railroad with no federal subsidies. He built the Great Northern slowly and made each part profitable before expanding it further. … Hill made profits and never went bankrupt. Here is the lesson: that which is privately owned is properly cared for and is best positioned to create jobs and profits. When the government gets involved, profits vanish and quality declines. Therefore, the president is right. Let’s discuss railroad history and apply what we learn to the present day.” The article is Interfacing with Obama’s Intercontinental Railroad.

    Alain festival starts. Today marks the first day of Jehan Alain, 1911-1940 — The American Festival, a three-day event celebrating the music of the French organist and composer, who died at the age of 29 fighting for his country against Germany in World War II. This three-day event is organized by Lynne Davis of Wichita State University. If you can attend only one event, I would suggest the opening recital to be performed by Davis at 7:30 pm tonight. The location is Wiedemann Recital Hall (map) on the campus of Wichita State University. … For more about Davis and WSU’s Great Marcussen Organ including photographs I took while climbing around the interior of the massive instrument, see my story from last year.

    How business loves regulation and hates markets. In a chapter of the book Back on the Road to Serfdom: The Resurgence of Statism edited by Thomas E. Woods Jr., Timothy P. Carney writes about the cultural costs of corporatism: “Despite the widespread assumption that a free market is the ideal economy for big business, and that regulation checks the power of big business, more often the opposite is true. Regulation, by adding to the cost of doing business, disproportionately hurt smaller business and acts as a barrier to entry, keeping out new competitors. Likewise, government subsidies can be far more valuable, or at least more reliable, then income for consumers, for which businesses must continually fight with competitors. The dynamics of the lobbying game are crucial here. Bigger companies enjoy a greater advantage in Washington than they do in the market. Not only can bigger companies hire the better lobbyists — former lawmakers are top administration aides — and handout more in campaign contributions, but they also matter more to lawmakers. The more workers you employ and the more taxes you pay, the more lawmakers care about your well-being, desires, and wishes.” … Carney goes on to explain that big government enables political entrepreneurs to succeed over market entrepreneurs. And big companies are better equipped to be political entrepreneurs. So while the standard account is that Walmart kills small-town retailers, the reality is that Walmart is effective at political entrepreneurship in ways that mom-and-pop retailers can’t be. “An unbridled free market isn’t killing Mom and Pop; an untethered state is.” The effect of this is, he writes: “And so reading the market is no longer as valuable as reading the polls. Research and development is not as good an investment as political connections. A good lobbyist is now worth more than a good idea.” … While Carney is writing about the situation at the federal level, we see the same dynamic at work in Wichita, where the city Council and its surrogates such as the Wichita Downtown Development Corporation and Greater Wichita Economic Development Coalition have large power over the granting of government favors. Connections to the politicians and bureaucrats that control these organizations replaces market allocation and market decisions.

    The Buffet rule won’t work. In a Cato daily podcast, Cato Institute Senior Fellow Alan Reynolds says “It doesn’t work. We tried it.” He’s referring to raising tax rates to collect more revenue from high-income earners. Reynolds explains that starting in 1986 and for the next 10 years the capital gains tax rate was 28 percent. But then President Bill Clinton lowered the rate to 20 percent, and Reynolds said that the stock market soared and the government was flush with cash. This, he said, was an example of lower tax rates increasing tax revenue. … Reynolds also explained that Berkshire Hathaway — the company Warren Buffet formed — was a tax avoidance device until 2003. As a holding company, it purchased companies that paid dividends, but Berkshire didn’t pay dividends itself. This practice avoided the higher dividends tax by converting dividends into capital gains. (Prior to 2003, dividends were taxed as ordinary income, which for most taxpayers was higher than the capital gains tax rate. Plus, capital gains can be deferred.) This purposeful design by Buffet belies his current contention that the wealthy should pay higher taxes.

  • Wichita about to commit to more spending. Bigly.

    Wichita about to commit to more spending. Bigly.

    This week the Wichita City Council considers hiring a consulting firm to develop plans for a new performing arts and convention center.

    Options from the City of Wichita.
    It’s no secret that many in Wichita want a new performing arts and convention center to replace Century II. Documents produced by the city sketch four possibilities ranging in price from $272 million to $492 million.1 2

    The two least expensive scenarios keep the existing Century II structure, while two call for completely new buildings, including the possibility of a performing arts center located a few blocks to the east of the present Century II and proposed convention center site.

    Apart from the financial desirability of these projects is the question of how to pay. The traditional approach would be for a city to build, own, and operate the project, paying for it through long-term borrowing. (Governments, including Wichita, often speak of “bonding” projects, a word which seems less foreboding than “borrowing.”)

    This week’s business for the city council foreshadows the city using a different method. The firm the city wants to hire, Arup Advisory, Inc., is an advocate of “P3” or public-private partnerships. A report Arup prepared for the City of Los Angeles3 recommended that the city use a method known as Design Build Finance Operate and Maintain (DBFOM), which Arup says is used interchangeably with P3.

    In the DBFOM or P3 model as applied to Wichita, a third party — thought to be George Laham — would do all the work of designing, financing, building, and operating a convention center and possibly a performing arts center. Then, the city simply pays a fee each year to use the center. It’s called an “availability payment.” Most people call this rent or lease payments.

    The Los Angeles document explains the potential benefits of using DBFOM or P3:

    Here, the City as asset owner hires a developer team to take on the full project development responsibility (design, build, finance, operate, maintain) and pays them an annual service fee for the availability of the functioning capital asset (i.e. infrastructure as a service). The service fee is called an “availability payment” in the P3 industry; it is a contractually scheduled pay-for-performance arrangement where the private partner is paid to design, build, and finance a turnkey capital asset and then is responsible for the operation and maintenance of the asset according to performance standards set by the City. The availability payments are fixed at the time the P3 contract is signed and are only subject to indexation to an agreed inflation index (e.g., US or Los Angeles region CPI) and deductions for non-performance against the contractually defined performance standards. The availability payments, which are the only form of compensation by the owner to the P3 developer, start only when the P3 developer has satisfied all the conditions stipulated in the contract for successful completion of construction and start of operations. These features provide substantial incentives for the P3 developer to achieve on-schedule and on-budget construction, as well as optimized life-cycle maintenance over the long term that meets the owner’s needs.

    A common strategy recommended by Arup is to “cross-subsidize” with real estate. This is vaguely defined as to “unlock significant land value” in city-owned real estate near the convention center. Specific to Wichita, the proposal from Arup to the city includes, “Assess potential revenue from the monetization of city’s owned land located in proximity to the Century II facility and determine the size of the cross subsidy to the project expansion design schemes 1 and 3.”4

    What are the benefits to the city of pursuing the DBFOM/P3 path? The Los Angeles document gives these: “No impact on debt capacity; significantly reduced cost to the General Fund, structured as an obligation to pay a service fee (i.e. availability payment) to the private partner where the value of the service fee is less than the sum of all the relevant LACC costs [for other options].”

    To emphasize, again from the Los Angeles document: “… the City’s budgetary obligation is in the form of a service fee (i.e. availability payment) to the private partner, recorded as a contractual liability on the City’s balance sheet, as opposed to a debt obligation, which does not impact the City’s debt capacity.”

    In other words, the city can make a decades-long financial committment without appearing to take on debt. Yes, the city’s committment — the “availabity payments” — will be characterized as payments that need be made only if the convention center facility is kept up to certain standards. If, not, then the city can stop paying. But then Wichita would have no cenvention center, and no performing arts center. Instead, the city would have one or two big, hulking, empty buildings in downtown.

    Should Wichita do this?

    Convention business is on a long downward trend. The Arup report for Los Angeles recognizes this:

    Over the last two decades, most large and medium size American cities have experienced a spur in convention center development. According to the Brookings Institution (2005), exhibit hall space in the US grew from 40 million square feet in 1990 to 85 million in 2014 distributed among 400+ facilities. There is a sense in the Convention business that the supply may be exceeding demand.

    (For more on convention center trends, see Should Wichita expand its convention facilities? The Brookings report by Heywood Sanders is available at Space Available: The Realities of Convention Centers as Economic Development Strategy.)

    A commitment of this size needs public input in the form of a vote. The “availability payments” the city may commit to will be characterized in various ways, but they represent a long-term commitment by the city that it can’t escape. If promised revenues from expanded convention trade don’t cover these payments, taxpayers will have to pay. The city, unfortunately, doesn’t have a good record of honesty with citizens:

    • In 2014 the city told citizens that $250 million in new sales tax revenue was required to provide drought protection. After the vote on the tax failed, the city found less expensive ways to provide the same protection.5
    • Subsidized city projects have not delivered promised benefits.6
    • The city is not truthful in reporting the number of people working in downtown Wichita.7
    • Despite much investment in downtown Wichita, both public and private, business activity is declining.8
    • Despite much investment in downtown Wichita, both public and private, total property valuation is declining.9
    • While touting transparency, the city fails in many basic ways, even though the city communications staff has been expanded.10 11 12

    Citizens and taxpayers should insist the city address these issues before committing to any new project, much less one the size of a renovated or new performing arts and convention center.

    And — most importantly — the people need to vote up or down on this project.

    Update: On May 9 the city council decided to hire this firm.


    Notes

    1. City of Wichita. Grand Vision: Wichita Performing Arts & Convention Center: ‘Millenials Place.’ Available at https://wichitaliberty.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Century-2-Vision.pdf.
    2. City of Wichita. The Heart of Downtown: Catalyst to a 21st Century Riverfront. Available at https://wichitaliberty.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Analysis-of-century-2.pdf.
    3. City of Los Angeles, Office Of The City Administrative Officer. Public-private Financing Options For The Los Angeles Convention Center Expansion Project. Available at http://cao.lacity.org/Reports/20151223%20CAO%20LACC%20Alternative%20Financing.pdf.
    4. City of Wichita. Agenda Packet for May 9, 2017.
    5. Weeks, Bob. In Wichita, the phased approach to water supply can save a bundle. In 2014 the City of Wichita recommended voters spend $250 million on a new water supply. But since voters rejected the tax to support that spending, the cost of providing adequate water has dropped, and dropped a lot. Available at https://wichitaliberty.org/wichita-government/wichita-phased-approach-water-supply-can-save-bundle/.
    6. Weeks, Bob. Downtown Wichita’s Block One, a beneficiary of tax increment financing. Before forming new tax increment financing districts, Wichita taxpayers ought to ask for progress on current districts. Available at https://wichitaliberty.org/wichita-government/downtown-wichita-block-one-beneficiary-tax-increment-financing/.
      Also: Ken-Mar TIF district, the bailouts. Available at https://wichitaliberty.org/wichita-government/ken-mar-tif-district-the-bailouts/. Since the bailout, the situation at the former Ken-Mar center has worsened.
      Also: Wichita TIF district disbands; taxpayers on the hook. Available at https://wichitaliberty.org/wichita-government/wichita-tif-district-disbands-taxpayers-hook/.
      Also: Wistrom, Brent. Warren bailout poses dilemma — city loan, vacant theater both carry risks. Wichita Eagle. Available at https://brentwistrom.wordpress.com/clips/eagle-exposes-lost-taxdollars-in-downtown-theater-loan/.
    7. Weeks, Bob. Downtown Wichita jobs, sort of. The claim of 26,000 workers in downtown Wichita is based on misuse of data so blatant it can be described only as malpractice. Available at https://wichitaliberty.org/wichita-government/downtown-wichita-jobs/.
    8. Weeks, Bob. Downtown Wichita business trends. There has been much investment in Downtown Wichita, both public and private. What has been the trend in business activity during this time? https://wichitaliberty.org/wichita-government/downtown-wichita-business-trends/.
    9. Weeks, Bob. Downtown Wichita tax base is not growing. There’s been much investment in downtown Wichita, we’re told, but the assessed value of property isn’t rising. Available at https://wichitaliberty.org/wichita-government/downtown-wichita-tax-base-not-growing/.
    10. Weeks, Bob. Wichita check register. A records request to the City of Wichita results in data as well as insight into the city’s attitude towards empowering citizens with data. Available at https://wichitaliberty.org/wichita-government/wichita-check-register-2016/.
    11. Weeks, Bob. Wichita doesn’t have this. A small Kansas city provides an example of what Wichita should do. Available at https://wichitaliberty.org/wichita-government/wichita-does-not-have-this/.
    12. Weeks, Bob. During Sunshine Week, here are a few things Wichita could do. The City of Wichita says it values open and transparent government, but the city lags far behind in providing information and records to citizens. Available at https://wichitaliberty.org/open-records/sunshine-week-wichita/.