At Pachyderm, Pompeo pleases the audience

Mike Pompeo at Wichita Pachyderm Club 2009-11-20Mike Pompeo at Wichita Pachyderm Club

Yesterday, Kansas fourth district congressional candidate Mike Pompeo addressed members and guests of the Wichita Pachyderm Club. His conservative message was well-received by the overflow audience.

Aaron Jack, Pompeo’s campaign manager, introduced Pompeo, pointing out that Pompeo has successfully run companies in two of our largest local industries: aviation and oil and gas. Pompeo also served as trustee of the Flint Hills Center for Public Policy (now the Kansas Policy Institute), helping to formulate public policy in Kansas.

As he has before, Pompeo presented the bottom line as to why he’s running for Congress: “Our federal elected officials have fundamentally lost their way, have become disconnected from our United States Constitution, and frankly don’t understand the challenges we face in the fourth district of Kansas.” He said he has the experiences, work ethic, integrity, and willingness to fight hard for Kansas.

He said that we’re approaching a point in our history where there’s not much turning back. We may soon have people going to the polls in sufficient numbers who are dependent on the federal government for their well-being. Not enough people are willing to work hard and produce, and once we reach this point, getting our civilization back would be a real challenge.

Pompeo spoke of a few “simple things” that illustrate his principles.

We cannot spend more money than we have, he said. It becomes unsustainable. He said this is the primary fight going on in Washington.

On earmarks, Pompeo said that they are a small piece of the total federal budget, but they are “incredibly important” in a symbolic way. Pompeo pledged never to support legislation that contains earmarks. Using earmarks corrupts the system, he said. When getting re-elected becomes the goal of elected officials, the “battle is over.”

“My faith is incredibly important to me,” Pompeo said as another simple fact.

Referring to his experience as commander of a unit that patrolled the East German/Czechoslovakian border, he said he appreciates national security issues. They’ve been “taken off the front page” because of economic issues, but there are still people that want to do us harm. If we send our armed forces into harm’s way, the commitment must be total, he said. “Half steps don’t work.”

His experience at Thayer Aerospace — the reason he came to Wichita — made him appreciate “what an enormous job-killer our federal government is.” We have a good workforce in America, but we have a terrible tax policy, and we may be getting a bad health care policy. “Capital will go where it gets the best return.” Our federal government needs to get out of the way of business, he said.

If a politician running for election says he’s going to Washington to create jobs, Pompeo said we should realize that’s not possible. The jobs government creates are bureaucratic jobs that aren’t in the competitive environment that grows America. Instead, Pompeo said that government should protect property and contract rights, and then go away and leave us alone.

The potential of cap-and-trade legislation will cost many jobs in the Kansas fourth district and across the country. North American oil and gas production will “drop to zero” if this bill will pass. It will also hurt agriculture, causing food prices to rise, he said.

On health care, Pompeo asked why this issue is at the top of the agenda. We have a health care system that is imperfect and needs work, but we have more important issues such as unemployment to tackle first. He said that it is not likely that a federal takeover of health care will reduce costs.

Pompeo’s prepared remarks were relatively brief, leaving time for many questions from the Pachyderm Club members and guests.

In response to a question, Pompeo said that we need to stand behind our commitment to Israel. In Afghanistan, he said that Generals Petraeus and McChrystal have it about right: “let’s get the troops in there.”

On education, Pompeo said that the federal government’s role should be minimal, to applause from the audience. Teacher tenure and lack of competition are not good for education, he said. There are many good teachers in the public schools, but the system is problematic and dysfunctional.

On the Federal Reserve system, Pompeo said that it is a “co-conspirator in the current economic challenge,” providing the interest rates and the backdrop for the housing crisis.

A question asked what Pompeo could do to create real steps for creating jobs, such as providing tax write-offs for consumer purchases. Pompeo said that some of these things sound like “cash for clunkers,” where government tries to pick and subsidize winners. He said he should not do that. Instead, he preferrs a broad tax base with low tax rates, letting competition decide who are the winners.

On term limits, Pompeo said he would like to see a constitutional amendment for term limits, but he would not make a personal pledge to limit his own service.

On right-to-life issues, Pompeo said he believes that human life begins at conception. He would fight federal funding of abortion.

On immigration, Pompeo said that we need to control our borders, and we need to know who is entering and leaving our country. We can’t have an intelligent discussion on immigration until we control our borders, he said.

On alternative tax systems like the Fair Tax, Pompeo said he supports it, although not being wedded to any one particular system. The real problem, he said, is spending, which must be brought under control.

On the rule of law and the free enterprise system, Pompeo said that these are core issues. People aren’t investing and taking risk, because presently there is no certainty about the rule of law and property rights. With the price of oil at $80, people should be investing in oil, but with the government causing so much uncertainty in regulation and law, investors are hesitant.

Analysis

The Pachyderm audience, largely composed of conservative Republicans, was appreciative of Pompeo and his message. Several times his remarks drew enthusiastic applause. Other candidates for the same position Pompeo is campaigning for have been positively received by this audience, too. This is indicative of the fact that there are a number of good, quality people seeking this Congressional office.

On term limits, while he appreciates their benefit, Pompeo’s position of not limiting his own service without a national law is reasonable.

Pompeo’s pledge to not vote for earmarks may be difficult to fulfill in the current Washington climate. Even Ron Paul votes for earmarks.

Additional coverage of this speech is at State of the State Kansas.

Comments

13 responses to “At Pachyderm, Pompeo pleases the audience”

  1. JOe

    So when did he moved to Wichita? All I know is that he sold his interest stake in Thayer in 2006. I just want to know if he’s carpetbagging or not.

  2. reagan conservative

    Ron Paul not only votes for earmarks, he inserts them into bills! He’s a hypocrite. Leaders like Jeff Flake, John Shaddegg, and Tom Coburn don’t do either. Mike Pompeo is the real deal. He also recognizes, as do the aforementioned champions of fiscal conservatism, that if a defense authorization bill to fund our soldiers comes to a vote and has earmarks in it due to shenanigans, then it is perfectly acceptable to vote for the underlying bill after every attempt has been made to eliminate the earmarks.

  3. Anonymous

    Are there any women at these meetings? So Mr. Pompeo believes that the role of government should be minimal and yet supports banning federal funding for abortion ( and birth control?, and high insurance rates for women who might get pregnant?). Abortion is synonymous with the words miscarriage, D&C, and pregnancy termination for all sorts of reasons other than wild eyed moral conservatism. What is the difference between the Chinese government forcing abortion and the US government banning it? BUT Viagra – must go on!!

  4. sue

    It is interesting to see so many good people step up to the plate for service to our country. I hope Mr. Pompeo is true to his words, because I do like what he says. We have been betrayed by people who “talk” conservative, then “vote” moderate. We need to get our country back to traditional, constitutional values. I will vet all the candidates, and make an informed decision on who to support. I appreciate forums like the Pachyderm club and others, which allow us to hear from our truly good candidates. Good, balanced reporting, Bob!

  5. Benjamin

    When was Ron Paul mentioned in this article? Pompeo did’t even mention an audit of the “Federal” Reserve. Obamination wants to put in 40,000 more troops in Afghanistan. Looks like they both agree there. The RNC in Kansas put up McCain in the primary when Kansas clearly wanted Huckabee. The RNC is giving people the shaft. Pompeo also declined to answer I-Caucus questions. Why is he afraid of 20 questions? The questions are pro liberty and common sense. You also need to Youtube a video called Ronald Reagan on Ron Paul.

  6. JK

    “reagan conservative” let me get this straight… champions of fiscal conservatism will approve a defense authorization bill to fund an illegal war, but when it comes to earmarks, they have to vote against the bill because of principle. You’re missing the hemorrhaging wound! Earmarks (I think you really mean “pork” legislation) account for a small amount of the budget where the military industrial complex accounts for the majority of America’s spending. I understand nobody likes earmarks added onto bill, but your argument holds no water, you are using a band aid in an attempt to fix a heart attack. We can not fix Americas financial problems until we decide to stop killing brown people. Earmarks are not the problem, our global empire is.

  7. Benjamin

    Hey “sue”… Pompeo would not even take the 20 I-caucus questions. Now he is begging to take them after people learned of it. “JK” you put in better words then I could have came up with. These Sean “Vannity”, Bill the shill OReilly, Rush Pillbaugh and amnesty loving McCain voters are still stuck in their neocon ways. The democrats are about the same way. Now they love the wars because Obama supports the wars. Reagan is rolling in his grave right now over where the neocons took the “republican” party. Glad I am a registered independent. I was sick of the RNC and DNC. Both are the left and right wings of a vulture that are ready to peck the hell out of America.

  8. Julie

    Hey, Anonymous,
    Banning funding for abortion is not equivalent to banning abortion. Having a right to something doesn’t mean you have a right to have it paid for by taxpayer money. And, just so you know, Medicare does not cover the cost of Viagra for erectile dysfunction.

  9. reagan conservative

    Wow…liberal vitriol and hatred never ceases to amaze me.

  10. Benjamin

    If you are calling me a liberal then that is a joke you can take to the Looney Bin Comedy Club. Did you go to the KC , End the “Federal” Reserve march in Sunday?? I did. Did you vote for Chuck Baldwin (Constitutionial Party presidential candidate) last year??? I did. Do you hand out pocket Constitutions to people wherever you go? I do. “Reagan Conservative” you are like a liberal. You just come on a message board, say something and since you have nothing to argue with, you call people names. People who can not shake their left/right paradigm never cease to amaze me! Keep letting the mainstream media wash your brain.

  11. red and black

    Joe: Mike moved to Wichita in 1996 and has lived there continuously since. His mother was a native Kansan and he has numerous relatives who live across the state: his roots run deep.

  12. Benjamin

    His roots might run deep but the fruits of his tree aren’t looking too ripe.

  13. Steven A. Rosile

    Ron Paul does not vote for any earmarks. If you read the link provided in the above article it states that Paul puts any earmarks his constituients ask for in the budget bills as a means to recoup some of the taxes they have paid but Paul then votes against the bills thenselves.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.