Category: Health care

  • My struggle with Dupuytren’s Disease

    My struggle with Dupuytren’s Disease

    If you’ve wondered why I seem to disappear once in a while, here is why.

    Dupuytren’s Contracture, or Dupuytren’s Disease, is “… a benign condition which causes a tightening of the flesh beneath the skin of the palm and can result in permanently bent fingers.” I am afflicted with this, in a severe manner.

    It usually starts with small nodules in the palms. Then, in some people, cords develop in the palm and fingers. In some of these people, the cords tighten, which is what causes the fingers to contract. In my experience, these cords are very strong. It seems like the bones in my fingers would break before the cords.

    There is no cure, but the condition can be treated. Two non-invasive treatments are regularly used. One is needle aponeurotomy, where the doctor uses a needle to cut the cord until it can be broken. The other treatment is Xiaflex, an enzyme that is injected into a cord. It attacks the cord and weakens it, and after a few days the doctor can snap the cord. I’ve had one Xiaflex injection. In my case, the cord snapped like a carrot stick. (Xiaflex is the treatment advertised by former Denver Broncos quarterback John Elway.)

    The most common invasive treatment is fasciectomy. This is major surgery, where the doctor cuts open the palm and fingers and dissects the diseased tissue. It’s a tedious operation, often performed under magnification, where the surgeon must exercise great care to avoid damage to nerves and blood vessels. I’ve had five such operations since 2016, some involving multiple fingers, and some revising previous surgery. Some were dermofasciectomy, meaning skin grafts were used.

    After surgery, my hands were in a cast for a week to ten days. After the cast is removed, physical and occupational therapy starts. In my case, the therapy is very painful. My fingers have large surgical wounds and are swollen, but the therapist must exercise the fingers to ensure they can both straighten and contract to form a fist. I wear a splint at night and during the day as much as I can tolerate. For me, all this is very painful, if I haven’t mentioned that already.

    This disease is not like cancer or heart disease. It will not kill me. But Dupuytren disease is associated with diabetes, hyperlipidemia, a variety of other medical conditions, increased cancer risk, and shortened lifespan. It often results in disability and loss of function, as it has in my life. Furthermore, the surgeries I’ve had, while successful, do not cure the disease. In fact, surgery leads to more surgery, in many cases. The Dupuytren’s Research Group explains: “The palm of the hand affected by Dupuytren’s behaves as though it is trying to shrink and heal an open skin wound that isn’t there. When surgery leaves skin wounds, because the hand has Dupuytren’s, the normal reaction to wounding can be greatly exaggerated: swelling, stiffness, tenderness, difficulty using the hand, and this reaction can drag on for much longer than it would without Dupuytren’s. The reaction to open surgery can result in permanent complications even if surgery is technically perfect.” This is one of the Catch-22s of treating Dupuytren’s contracture.

    But without surgery, the contractions will usually progress until function of the hands is lost.

    Click for larger.
    I’m making available a photograph of my surgery. This is my most recent, on my dominant hand, taken two weeks after surgery. It is graphic, so use discretion before clicking.

    If you would like to learn more, I recommend the Dupuytren Research Group. A three-minute video explanation from this organization is here.

    Articles, etc.

    • From Dupuytren Research Group, a three-minute video explanation is available on YouTube here.
    • This is a video lecture by Dr. Charles Eaton, executive director of the Dupuytren Research Group. It presents the latest knowledge as of 2019. It is 49 minutes in length, available on YouTube this link. The YouTube channel for Dupuytren Research Group is here.
    • This one-minute video is a tour of the amazing and complex hand anatomy. It uses a cadaver hand and illustrated annotations to explain. Available on YouTube here.
    • Here is an interesting article about Dupuytrens, published shortly after Ronald Reagan had surgery for the condition. This is from the New York Times, but I’m linking to an archived version that requires no subscription. Please note this article was written in 1989.
      The Doctor’s World: Many, Like Reagan, Find Bent Finger a Bother (1989)
      link

  • Inspector General evaluates Obamacare website

    Inspector General evaluates Obamacare website

    The HHS Inspector General has released an evaluation of the Obamacare website HealthCare.gov, shedding light on the performance of former Kansas Governor Kathleen Sebelius.

    The Office of Inspector General for the Department of Health and Human Services has released a report titled HealthCare.gov: Case Study of CMS Management of the Federal Marketplace. An excerpt from the executive summary holds the main points:

    What We Found

    The development of HealthCare.gov faced a high risk of failure, given the technical complexity required, the fixed deadline, and a high degree of uncertainty about mission, scope, and funding. Still, we found that HHS and CMS made many missteps throughout development and implementation that led to the poor launch. Most critical was the absence of clear leadership, which caused delays in decisionmaking, lack of clarity in project tasks, and the inability of CMS to recognize the magnitude of problems as the project deteriorated. Additional HHS and CMS missteps included devoting too much time to developing policy, which left too little time for developing the website; making poor technical decisions; and failing to properly manage its key website development contract. CMS’s organizational structure and culture also hampered progress, including poor coordination between policy and technical work, resistance to communicating and heeding warnings of “bad news,” and reluctance to alter plans in the face of problems. CMS continued on a failing path to developing HealthCare.gov despite signs of trouble, making rushed corrections shortly before the launch that proved insufficient. These structural, cultural, and tactical deficiencies were particularly problematic for HealthCare.gov given the significant challenges of implementing a new program involving multiple stakeholders and a large technology build.

    The problems are not solved. Challenges remain, the report says, including “contract oversight, the accuracy of payments and eligibility determinations, and information security controls.”

    Who is responsible for the debacle? In a hearing before Congress, HHS Secretary and former Kansas Governor Kathleen Sebelius said “hold me accountable.” View a video clip below, or click here to view at C-SPAN.

  • Medicaid found to increase, not decrease, emergency room usage

    This is an astonishing finding, and contrary to what the conventional wisdom has told us about health care.

    For years, it has been the number one talking point of Obamacare supporters. People who are uninsured end up getting costly care from hospitals’ emergency rooms. “Those of us with health insurance are also paying a hidden and growing tax for those without it — about $1,000 per year that pays for [the uninsureds’] emergency room and charitable care,” said President Obama in 2009. Obamacare, the President told us, would solve that problem by covering the uninsured, thereby driving premiums down. A new study, published in the journal Science, definitively reaches the opposite conclusion. In Oregon, people who gained coverage through Medicaid used the emergency room 40 percent more than those who were uninsured.

    Continue reading at New Oregon Data: Expanding Medicaid Increases Usage Of Emergency Rooms, Undermining Central Rationale For Obamacare

  • Study: Kansas premiums to spike following Obamacare rollout

    From Kansas Watchdog.

    Study: Kansas premiums to spike following Obamacare rollout

    By 

    ON THE RISE: A new report from the Heritage Foundation says Obamacare premiums are significantly higher in Kansas compared to average rates before the rollout of the new health care law.

    By Travis Perry, Kansas Watchdog

    OSAWATOMIE — Good news: Kansas landed in the top 10 in a recent study conducted by the conservative Heritage Foundation! Bad news: It’s for massive insurance premium hikes because ofObamacare.

    Kinda puts a damper on things, huh?

    As I said, before dashing your optimism with harsh reality, Kansas is among the top 10 states to possibly see the largest premium increases following the rollout of the federal health care exchange, according to a recent report from Heritage’s Center for Data Analysis. In a nutshell, the report states Obamacare health premiums available to Kansans will be higher than existing policies.

    According to the Heritage report, the average premium for a 27-year-old Sunflower State resident will rise from $87.40 to $200.14, a massive 129 percent bump. This gives Kansas the unfortunate privilege of boasting the sixth-highest increase for young people nationwide.

    The news gets slightly better for other groups, but not by much. Average premiums for a 50-year-old adult could increase from $198 to $341.08 (72.3 percent increase), while a family of four may see an increase from $553.92 to $676.05 (22 percent increase).

    “Many families and individuals will face this reality as they apply for coverage, and the implications of experiencing sticker shock are important to consider if enough people choose not to sign up for coverage for various reasons,” policy analyst Drew Gonshorowski wrote in the Oct. 16 report.

    The massive increase in premiums for young people should be especially concerning, as they’re the one group Obamacare can’t afford to do without. The successful implementation of the Affordable Care Act depends heavily on the young and healthy signing up to help pay for the elderly and infirm.

    It’s important to note the Heritage study compares premium prices straight-up, not including government subsidies designed to decrease the cost to low-income individuals and families.

    “This analysis represents the change in unsubsidized rate levels,” Gonshorowski wrote. “The purpose of this research is to provide further details on the changing premium levels across the country.”

    Source Report: How Will You Fare in the Obamacare Exchanges?

    Contact Travis Perry at travis@kansaswatchdog.org, or follow him on Twitter at@muckraker62.

  • ObamaCare chart updated

    obamacare-chart

    Republicans of the Joint Economic Committee of the U.S. Congress have released an update of a chart to help us navigate ObamaCare. (Click on it for a larger version.) From the July 2010 press release accompanying the original chart: “Four months after U.S. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi famously declared ‘We have to pass the bill so you can find out what’s in it,’ a congressional panel has released the first chart illustrating the 2,801 page health care law President Obama signed into law in March. Developed by the Joint Economic Committee minority, led by U.S Senator Sam Brownback of Kansas and Rep. Kevin Brady of Texas, the detailed organization chart displays a bewildering array of new government agencies, regulations and mandates.”

    Read all about it at Health Care Chart — Updated Chart Shows Obamacare’s Bewildering Complexity.

  • ObamaCare employer mandate delayed, start of train wreck?

    aspirin-bottleScheduled to take effect on January 1, the employer mandate portion of the Affordable Care Act (ObamaCare) has been delayed for one year.

    Curiously, this announcement was made on an obscure Treasury Department blog, along with articles titled “Meeting, and Exceeding, Our Small Business Procurement Goals in FY 2012” and “In Case You Missed It: Top Executives Say U.S. Is #1 for Foreign Direct Investment.”

    The employer mandate requires those who employ more than 50 full time-equivalent employees to provide insurance or pay a penalty. Cato Institute’s Michael D. Tanner notes the general problem, and a specific problem based on the decision to delay the employer mandate:

    In postponing the implementation of the Affordable Care Act’s employer mandate until after the 2014 mid-term elections, the Obama administration has tacitly admitted what critics of the law have long contended: that Obamacare is unworkable and would be a significant burden for American business and the economy at large. Stay tuned for further dominoes falling.

    Actually, the Administration’s decision to postpone the employer mandate may make a bad situation worse. Because the individual mandate remains in place, workers may now face a situation where they must purchase their own insurance or pay a penalty because their employers don’t provide coverage. In effect, the administration’s decision shifts the cost from employers to workers. This hardly seems fair, and may force the administration to rethink the individual mandate as well. (And So the Obamacare Train Wreck Begins … )

    Will the implementation of other parts of ObamaCare be delayed? I think it seems likely. But: Section 1513 AVC states, regarding the employer mandate: “The amendments made by this section shall apply to months beginning after December 31, 2013.” So does the administration have the legal authority to make changes like this?

    uninsured-estimates-2013-05

    Also: For all the wrenching debate and changes, there will still be many uninsured people. Here’s a chart based on the Congressional Budget Office May 2013 estimate of the effects of the Affordable Care Act on health insurance coverage.

    This is just the start of discovery of pathologies built into ObamaCare. Here’s Avik Roy explaining an incentive contained within the employer mandate:

    The strong penalty vs. the weak penalty

    The employer mandate actually consists of two different penalties, based on two different categories of employer behavior. These originate from Section 4980H of the Affordable Care Act. Subsection (a) requires steep penalties for employers who offer no coverage at all. Subection (b) requires modest penalties for employers who offer “minimum essential coverage under an eligible employer-sponsored plan.” This difference — between the strong penalty in 4980H(a) and the weak penalty in 4980H(b) — is crucial to understanding how things will play out in the future.

    Under the strong penalty, in which an employer “fails to offer to its full-time employees…the opportunity to enroll in minimum essential coverage,” and “at least one full-time employee” enrolls in an exchange, the employer has to pay a fine of $2,000 times the total number of full-time-equivalent employees at the firm, minus 30. (The employer mandate only applies to firms with 50 or more full-time-equivalent workers.) So if you employ 50 workers, that’s a fine of 20 * $2,000 = $40,000. And the fine isn’t tax-deductible, adding to the pain.

    Under the weak penalty, in which an employer does offer “the opportunity to enroll in minimum essential coverage,” but that coverage doesn’t meet Obamacare’s requirements for affordability or actuarial value, and at least one worker enrolls on an exchange instead, the fine is $3,000 times the number of workers who enroll on the exchanges. So, if you employ 50 workers, and three of them get coverage on the exchange instead, the fine is a much lower 3 * $3,000, or $9,000. (Technically, in subsection (b), employers pay the lesser of the weak penalty or the strong penalty, but this in most cases should be the weak penalty.)

    So: Employers avoid the strong penalty and gain eligibility for the weak penalty by offering “minimum essential coverage.”

    Roy goes on to explain that “minimum essential coverage” means coverage my any insurance plan that can legally be sod in a state, including plans that provide limited coverage or services. Roy writes that companies may offer these bare-bones plans to their employees and escape the penalties.

    This behavior, which federal officials have confirmed is allowed, evidently wasn’t considered by officials, writes Roy: “Nonetheless, Obamacare’s designers expressed surprise that employers would do such a thing. ‘Our expectation was that employers would offer high quality insurance,’ said Robert Kocher, a former Obama health care adviser. It wouldn’t be the first time that the law’s authors didn’t recognize how economic incentives actually work.”

    Economic incentives are what makes the world work. They’re based on human behavior, and that isn’t easily changed, even to suit Barack Obama’s desires.

  • Alternative model of medical practice growing in Wichita

    On the Joseph Ashby Show, Dr. Doug Nunamaker appeared to discuss Atlas MD.

    [powerpress url=”http://wichitaliberty.org/audio/joseph-ashby-show-2013-06-24-excerpt-doug-nunamaker.mp3″]Dr. Doug Nunamaker on Joseph Ashby Show, June 24, 2013
  • The future of Obamacare, now he tells us

    This is a sad commentary on the state of politics and governance in the U.S., from the Boston Globe:

    Unencumbered by the political pressures of a reelection campaign, Baucus is in a position to call out both the failure of federal officials to prepare for implementing Obamacare as well as the unintended consequences of its complex regulations.

    A short while ago, before U.S. Senator Max Baucus announced his retirement, U.S. Representative Mike Pompeo of Wichita noticed the incongruity of Baucus complaining about a law he passed, tweeting the following:

    Following are excerpts from a letter Pompeo sent to Baucus, followed by the entire letter.

    My shock wasn’t because I disagreed: You’re right to say this legislation has led to great uncertainty for hard-working Americans, small business owners, and families. No, I was shocked because you wrote this bill. I was saddened because your acknowledgment of the harm caused by PPACA has come so late.

    No one in the country bears more responsibility for the complexity of this law than you. When your supermajority couldn’t pass the bill using normal procedures, you and your Senate colleagues rammed through the final legislation by using parliamentary gimmickry. Then, in the House, Speaker Pelosi cheerfully urged members to pass the legislation “in order to find out what’s in it.” This was not good policy-making, and now we’re seeing the consequences.

    Secretary Sebelius’s implementation of the law is certainly flawed, but the policy process produced a law that could not possibly be implemented successfully. As legislators, it is our responsibility to write bills that clearly explain our meaning and have achievable goals. By your own admission, this law is a disaster.

    You drafted it, you twisted arms to get it passed, and, until now, you have lauded it as a model for all the world. Your attempts to pass the buck to President Obama’s team will not work, nor will they absolve you of responsibility for the harm that you have brought via this law.

    [gview file=”http://pompeo.house.gov/uploadedfiles/130418_-_letter_-_pompeo_to_baucus_on_obamacare.pdf”]