USD 259, the Wichita public school district, has recently decided on some architects to award contracts to for work funded by the 2008 bond issue.
Citizens might have wondered why so many architectural and construction firms had such a high degree of interest in public schools. But these firms know that if you want to get contracts, it’s not required, but it sure helps to make some campaign contributions.
The following chart shows that while the correlation isn’t perfect, it helps to make a large contribution if you want to get a large contract. The outlier data point is Schaefer Johnson Cox Frey Architecture. This firm made the largest campaign contribution. It also snagged the project management contract for the bond issue. This contract was awarded without any competitive bidding. This contact pays the firm 1% of the total value of all bond projects, and no doubt helps the firm obtain the most lucrative architecture contracts, too.
And to think I was about to believe that it was all about the kids.

Related posts:
- Who Runs the Wichita School Bond Issue Campaign?
- Wichita BOE’s Nolan expresses concern
- Wichita school board chooses not to keep business local
- Wichita school bond contributors: self-interest gone wild
- Wichita school bond finance report omits a big contribution
- Schaefer Johnson Cox Frey Architecture Wins. Who Lost?
- Wichita school district’s favorite architect stands to win big
- Schaefer Johnson Cox Frey Architecture: Wichita School District’s Favorite Architect Has Hand in Everything
- Carol Rupe, Kansas School Board Member, Speaks for the Wichita School Bond Issue
- Pay-to-play laws are needed in Wichita and Kansas







{ 2 comments… read them below or add one }
That’s my money their playing with! I want a competitive bid process!!
I need to explore this type of chart in Johnson County with school projects and contributors.