Intrust Bank Arena’s missing name

by Bob Weeks on January 7, 2010

A note to readers: I served as co-manager of Peterjohn’s campaign in 2008.

The commemorative plaque on the Intrust Bank Arena in downtown Wichita, Kansas.The commemorative plaque on the Intrust Bank Arena in downtown Wichita, Kansas.

On the commemorative plaque outside the Intrust Bank Arena in downtown Wichita, there’s a missing name.

The names of eight Sedgwick County commissioners appear, including all who were members of the Commission when the arena sales tax passed in November 2004, all who have served since then, and all present commissioners.

Except for one: current third district commissioner Karl Peterjohn.

In 2004 Peterjohn led opposition to the sales tax ballot measure that funded the arena. When he decided early in 2008 that he would run for the commission against long-time Republican incumbent Tom Winters, Peterjohn told Winters that the next commissioner would have their name on a plaque on the arena. On primary election night, when Peterjohn defeated Winters, Peterjohn told me “I told him [Winters] he could have that spot, and I’m keeping my word.”

It was a gracious gesture.

There’s been a small controversy surrounding Peterjohn in his new role as arena supporter. He participated in the arena’s recent ribbon-cutting ceremony. More importantly, he voted last February for a $1.7 million seating upgrade. That upgrade would reduce the cost of transition between events, and also improve seating and viewing.

That vote, along with participation in the ribbon-cutting, is central to Peterjohn’s goal of seeing that the arena is a success and doesn’t become a fiscal burden on taxpayers. Although the contract with SMG, the arena’s management firm, shields Sedgwick County from losses, that contract comes to an end someday. It’s also full of loopholes that, in my opinion, would allow SMG to make an early exit if arena finances are not favorable.

Working for the success of the arena, therefore, is a logical continuation of Peterjohn’s concern for the taxpayer, the same concern as when he opposed the arena in 2004, he said.

There’s also been grumbling that county commissioners and bureaucrats will receive perks such as tickets and premium parking passes to arena events. Peterjohn said he’s received no tickets or parking perks.

A Wichita Eagle blog post by Deb Gruver on this topic is Karl Peterjohn’s name not on Intrust Bank Arena sign.

Related posts:

  1. Arenas’ Financial Statements Not Complete
  2. Wichita Intrust Bank Arena profit, in perspective
  3. Intrust Bank Arena depreciation expense ignored
  4. Wichita’s Intrust Bank Arena shrouded in mystery
  5. Assessment of Wichita’s Intrust Bank Arena’s success premature
  6. Low NBA attendance in Wichita danger sign for Intrust Bank Arena
  7. Wichita downtown arena parking problem
  8. Wichita downtown arena project’s failing finances
  9. Legislative Delegation, Saturday February 5, 2005
  10. Intrust Bank Arena finances: The worst news is hidden

{ 5 comments… read them below or add one }

1 Dismal Scientist January 9, 2010 at 7:25 pm

Good for Karl! He is keeping his principles. I will never set foot in Intrust Bank Arena until the public auction takes place that privatizes it! I hope the Brad Paisley parking situation goes terribly. I cannot wait to hear the complaints……wwaahh wwaahh….

2 Wichitator January 11, 2010 at 10:50 am

I’m glad that the parking downtown was not a problem. Whether a commissioner has his or her name missing on the plaque won’t matter a lick on the really important stuff.

It will be interesting to observe any new “economic development” from the brand new Intrust Arena.

3 OMD January 12, 2010 at 11:37 am

I really cant understand anyones gripes with the building of the Arena, what is every anti gov, anti moving forward persons gripes, could you please answer me that question?

Seems like a ‘few people’ with nothing better to do than waist peoples time jump on board a train to know were, and, Im pretty sure these few are the non productive citizens of Sedgwick County.

4 Bob January 21, 2010 at 9:56 am

Many of us that supported the arena did so based on the information provided at District Advisory Boards, several presentation for the public and statements from local officials. Those proposals included an arena with 18,000 seating capacity, 3,000 new parking spaces, upgrading Brit Brown arena and the assurance that there was a need for both facilities. We did not get what we voted for and that is an issue that deserves holding our elected official responsible.

5 Betty Sue Petty January 24, 2010 at 10:27 pm

I attended the Thunder hockey game 1/23;the arena is nice,but the parking is not.People were strung out for blocks walking to and from the arena,at least it wasn’t raining!
What more can be said about the lack of planning for parking,I did not know there was supposed to be an additional 3000 parking spaces.

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: