A column by economist Walter E. Williams (Why we’re a divided nation) strongly makes the case for more decision making by free markets rather than by the government through the political process.
When decisions are made through free markets, Dr. Williams says, both parties win, because in a free market, parties voluntarily enter into only those transactions that benefit them.
When decisions are made for us by the government, however, it is almost always the case that one party’s gain is someone else’s loss. Therefore, there is conflict. The more decisions made through politics, the more potential for conflict. Coalitions arise in order to try to get more from the government, and the most effective coalitions “are those with a proven record of being the most divisive — those based on race, ethnicity, religion and region.”
The final paragraph of the column is this: “The best thing the president and Congress can do to heal our country is to reduce the impact of government on our lives. Doing so will not only produce a less divided country and greater economic efficiency but bear greater faith and allegiance to the vision of America held by our founders — a country of limited government.”
In an earlier post, I mentioned some columns by Dr. Williams that I thought were important. This column is certainly one of his best, as it very simply, in one short page, shows us a major fault in our current political landscape.
Related posts:
- Political decision-making increases conflict
- Decisions made through politics leads to conflict
- Wichita Smoking Ban Starts. Sharon Fearey is Excited.
- Political Decision Making Leads To Conflict
- Attacking Lobbyists Wrong Battle
- The Williams rules
- Attacking lobbyists wrong battle
- Why government spending is (mostly) bad
- The Law by Frederic Bastiat
- Libertarian thinking discussed in Winfield
