The Wichita Eagle’s recent editorial by Rhonda Holman takes a few Kansas legislators to task for statements regarding regulatory uncertainly in Kansas (No ‘regulatory uncertainty’ in Kansas, October 28, 2008 Wichita Eagle). She claims their statements “don’t reflect reality” and that their untruths are harming Kansas’ ability to bring in business.
I want to remind Ms. Holman of reporting in the Topeka Capital-Journal from earlier this year which investigated some of the issues surrounding the denial of the permit for the expansion of Holcomb Station. As reported in my post Rod Bremby’s Action Drove Away the Refinery, the Secretary of the Kansas Department of Health and Environment absolutely created a very confusing situation. He denied a plant solely for its level of carbon emissions, and then said that a proposed plant that emits even more carbon would not be a problem.
Who would trust a public official who speaks like that?
Besides this, Ms. Holman says the Holcomb plant is bad for Kansas, as it exports power “while leaving Kansas with 100 percent of the carbon dioxide.” I know of no authority — not even Al Gore — that believes that carbon dioxide pollution is a problem in the local vicinity of a power plant. To the extent that carbon emissions are a problem — and that’s a mighty big “if” — it’s a problem on a global scale. Why else would climate change alarmists be concerned about carbon emissions from power plants in China?
Related posts:
- Rod Bremby’s Action Drove Away the Refinery
- Share in the green-energy boom and quit fighting
- Where’s the dirtiest coal plant in Kansas?
- Drinkwine editorial on Kansas carbon emissions overlooks evidence
- GPACE “Sunflower” Questions Misleading
- Rhonda Holman’s Kansas Energy Policy: Not Good for Kansas
- Kansas owns the carbon, says the governor
- Kansas Climate Profile: Cause For Alarm?
- Kansas environmental policy is full of uncertainty
- Earthjustice meddles in Kansas again








{ 1 comment… read it below or add one }
Why won’t the McClatchy papers report these facts? Oh, their stock is less than $3 dollars and their bond ratings have been cut.