In the debate of what to do about health care, advocates — such as President Obama — cite countries that spend much less than the United States. An example is the United kingdom.
The president believes that if we can control costs through better medical practice and efficiency gains, we too can have more health care provided at less cost.
The Wall Street Journal article Of NICE and Men tells us how Great Britain is able to control its costs. It’s through the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, or NICE.
Originally it was established to “ensure that the government-run National Health System used ‘best practices’ in medicine.” This sounds like a good program, doesn’t it?
But as the Journal article details, it hasn’t quite worked out that way. The article concludes: “But it [NICE] has by now established the principle that the only way to control health-care costs is for this panel of medical high priests to dictate limits on certain kinds of care to certain classes of patients.”e
PDF Related posts:
- Wichita’s Galichia provides what government health care doesn’t
- Obama health care rejected in Missouri election
- After U.S. health care reform, where will Canadians go?
- Wall Street Journal on government health care
- In health care debate, can we trust the president?
- Health care reform threatens anesthesiology, patients
- Not all health care administrative costs are wasteful
- European health care rationing boards: coming to America?
- Be Wary of Government Control of Health Care
- Rationing of health care, now and on the horizon
{ 1 trackback }