Comments on: ‘Not Evil Just Wrong’ filmmaker tells of harms of radical environmentalists

By: SPURWING PLOVER

SPURWING PLOVER — Wed, 09 Feb 2011 16:29:59 +0000

The ban on DDT was based on lies and junk science and from varius eco-freak groups

By: Kansas should not repeat Europe's mistakes

Kansas should not repeat Europe's mistakes — Tue, 30 Mar 2010 19:00:53 +0000

[...] Of Global Warming Hysteria (www.noteviljustwrong.com). For coverage of her talk in Wichita, see ‘Not Evil Just Wrong’ filmmaker tells of harms of radical environmentalists. For my review of Not Evil Just Wrong, see “Not Evil Just Wrong” a powerful refutation [...]

By: Flu-Bird

Flu-Bird — Wed, 18 Nov 2009 05:17:02 +0000

A real documentry much better then AL GORES fat ego trip

By: bigtroutz

bigtroutz — Sat, 17 Oct 2009 11:36:28 +0000

As a global warming sceptic, I am always pleased to see Gore get hoisted on his own petard. However, using the bullcrap lies associated with Rachel Carson and DDT could not be a worse mistake. Now your argument comes under the category of ‘do 2 wrongs make a right’. The simplest investigation of the facts will reveal this set of fabrications.

1) Rachel Carson NEVER suggested that DDT be BANNED as a malaria vector control agent. In fact, she specifically recommended that it’s use be curtailed for crops and forest pests not only because of the largely unknown deleterious effects, but also because such misuse made it less effective against such disease vectors.
2) DDT was NEVER banned in the USA. It’s use is still legal to control insect-disease-vectors to this day.
3) The total tonnage of global DDT use INCREASED in the decades following its usage-restriction in the USA.
4) The same assholes pushing the global warming bullcrap (United Nations) decided in their great wisdom to eventually totally ban DDT usage by dictat which nobody paid the slightest attention to. Rachel Carson had little to do with their stupidity. This ban’s only effect was to screw the poorest nations that needed to use UN funds for vector control, and so could not employ DDT. Anybody else with the cash could buy it on the open (grey) market and use it however they wished, more or less.
5) DDT continues to be manufactured and used to control insects to this day in various parts of the world, however the legacy of its misuse to control crop and forest pests has made it MUCH less effective as an insect disease vector control agent.

By: MJS

MJS — Thu, 15 Oct 2009 13:45:40 +0000

Sounds like an interesting film; but, no, I probably won’t see it: I don’t _need_ to be convinced of just how stupid and fanatical the environmentalists are. I pretty much already know everything they have to say in the film. Hopefully, lots of ordinary folks will see the film and realize just how stupid the environmentalists are; but I doubt it. First of all, the theaters are all in the hands of the very people this film is aimed at, especially the small, independent art houses, which can usually be counted on to run this kind of documentary; and they certainly will not admit heretics into their house. This means that people will have to actively seek the film out. And who’s going to do that? Only the people who already know what’s what. Thus, I seriously doubt the film will have any kind of substantial effect on public opinion. And even if millions of people saw it and were convinced, it wouldn’t stop Congress and the state legislatures from continuing to pass silly “green” laws to strangle our economy and reduce our freedom. It’s been clear for a long time that Congress pays no attention to public opinion. They don’t have to: each member’s re-election is virtually assured unless he gets caught with a mistress or an adolescent male lover.

And, by the way, mea sententia, the film should be titled “Not Merely Wrong, But Truly Evil.”

By: Larry

Larry — Wed, 30 Sep 2009 04:46:11 +0000

Thanks for the update Bob

By: James

James — Tue, 29 Sep 2009 20:46:52 +0000

Any other screenings you know of?