Or at least it should be, unless you’re a global warming alarmist. Then it’s okay to use September temperatures for missing October observations.
That’s what the Investor’s Business Daily editorial Cold, Hard Facts reports happened. Really.
The editorial is based on Steve McIntyre’s research, reported on his site Climate Audit in the post Did Napoleon Use Hansen’s Temperature Data?
Related posts:
- A Change in Climate for Climate Change Policy
- Why climate models are wrong
- Another Evangelical’s view of creation
- Geophysicist to testify before EPA
- Global warming fundamentals available
- Wichita Geophysicist explains climate science data
- Fraud, deceit, and misinformation regarding carbon dioxide
- Share in the green-energy boom and quit fighting
- Temperature Errors and Response Raise Doubts
- Don’t forfeit Kansas’ economic future to the United Nations







