Voice For Liberty in Wichita

Individual liberty, limited government, and free markets in Wichita and Kansas

Voice For Liberty in Wichita header image 1

Entries Tagged as 'Environment'

It’s colder in Russia in October than in September

November 19th, 2008 · No Comments

Or at least it should be, unless you’re a global warming alarmist. Then it’s okay to use September temperatures for missing October observations.
That’s what the Investor’s Business Daily editorial Cold, Hard Facts reports happened. Really.
The editorial is based on Steve McIntyre’s research, reported on his site Climate Audit in the post Did Napoleon Use Hansen’s [...]

[Read more →]

Tags: Environment

The Fallacy of “Green Jobs”

November 17th, 2008 · No Comments

Does climate change offer an opportunity to spend ourselves out of a possible recession? John Stossel doesn’t think so, and in his piece The Fallacy of “Green Jobs” he lays out the case.
Key points:
“The fallacy is the same in every case: Even if the program creates jobs building bridges or windmills, it necessarily prevents [...]

[Read more →]

Tags: Environment

A Change in Climate for Climate Change Policy

November 12th, 2008 · No Comments

From our friends at the Texas Public Policy Foundation, one of the many outstanding state-level research institutes working for liberty and free markets.
A Change in Climate for Climate Change Policy
By Kathleen Hartnett White
November 5, 2008
Come what dramatic political and economic changes may occur, a refrain persists within the media, industry, and the U.S. Congress that [...]

[Read more →]

Tags: Environment

Climate Change Resource Center Launched

November 11th, 2008 · No Comments

When evaluating the claims of radical environmental extremists, people need accurate and reliable information about global warming and climate change. To this end, I’ve started a Climate Change Resource Center page, where readers can find links to reliable sources of information.
If you know of other sources or articles that should be listed, please send them [...]

[Read more →]

Tags: Environment

Tax incentive for wind energy producers set to expire

September 17th, 2008 · No Comments

Kansas Liberty posts Tax incentive for wind energy producers set to expire.
This post explains that without subsidy, wind power generation facilities will likely not be built. Supporters of these tax credits, which are payments from the federal government through the tax system. These payments, termed “incentives” by their supporters, make wind power economically feasible. Without [...]

[Read more →]

Tags: Environment

Cap-and-trade Harmful to Kansas

September 16th, 2008 · No Comments

An op-ed in the Wichita Eagle (Amy J. Blankenbiller: Cap-and-trade would be harmful to Kansans) makes the case that some cures for global warming may cause more harm than good.
The author warns that “we could be heading toward ’solutions’ that are much more harmful to Kansas consumers and businesses than the environmental benefits they aim [...]

[Read more →]

Tags: Environment

Wind Power: Why Special Tax Treatment?

September 3rd, 2008 · No Comments

A recent article in USA Today (Renewable energy firms clamor for tax breaks) reports on the uncertainty of whether the U.S. Congress will extend the tax credits that subsidize solar and wind power investment. From the article:
Some $500 million in investment and production tax credits will expire Dec. 31 unless Congress renews them. Without that [...]

[Read more →]

Tags: Environment

The Problem of Environmental Calculation

September 2nd, 2008 · No Comments

One of the things about radical environmentalists is that they seem to learn a lesson, only to fail to learn from it. What do I mean?
Recently, New York Times writer David Pogue rehashed in a column titled The Bottom Line of the Eco Balance Sheet the “calculus of green” as it relates to the age-old [...]

[Read more →]

Tags: Environment

Kansas Can’t Do Much Locally To Counter Global Greenhouse Gas Emitters

August 22nd, 2008 · No Comments

A recent op-ed piece in the Wichita Eagle (Reader View: Give up on Climate Efforts?) makes the case that it is still important to fight climate change at the local level, here in Kansas. “When millions of people act, even in small ways, it has a cumulative effect on the planet.”
The problem is that most [...]

[Read more →]

Tags: Environment

Pickens’s Slim Economics

August 14th, 2008 · No Comments

An article from the Foundation for Economic Education warns us to be cautious when considering the plans of oilman T. Boone Pickens:
Pickens’s commercial no doubt causes FEE readers’ classical-liberal antennae to stand at attention. The word “plan” alone rightly provokes worries of coercive schemes. The notion of being independent of energy or any other commodity [...]

[Read more →]

Tags: Environment

Will Climate Change Impact Kansas?

July 24th, 2008 · No Comments

Kansas Liberty reports on the wide variance in conclusions drawn by two studies on the effect of climate change in Kansas in the post Will climate change impact Kansas? The fact that such variation exists tells me that we should proceed cautiously before committing Kansas to a costly process that, in the end, makes no [...]

[Read more →]

Tags: Environment

Wind Production Tax Credits Aren’t Free of Cost

July 24th, 2008 · No Comments

Nancy Jackson of the Climate and Energy Project in Kansas has some tips for citizens and candidates to use when talking about global warming. The article Tips for citizens and candidates - talking about the Production Tax Credit contains warnings about what will happen if the Production Tax Credit (PTC) isn’t extended beyond its scheduled [...]

[Read more →]

Tags: Environment

Jack Pelton, Leader of Kansas Energy and Environmental Policy Advisory Group

July 15th, 2008 · 2 Comments

Earlier this year, Kansas Governor Kathleen Sebelius created the Kansas Energy and Environmental Policy Advisory Group (KEEP) and appointed Cessna Aircraft Company chairman, president and chief executive officer Jack Pelton as its leader.
This was a smart political move by Governor Sebelius. She appears to have put the planning for our state’s energy future in the [...]

[Read more →]

Tags: Environment

Wikipropaganda On Global Warming

July 14th, 2008 · No Comments

CBS News picks up on a National Review Online story about the idealogical bias of Wikipedia when it comes to the subject of global warming.
On Wikipedia, regular folks like me who make changes to articles are known as “editors.” When we make these edits, they are subject to review and possible revision or deletion [...]

[Read more →]

Tags: Environment

Rasmussen Poll on Kansas Coal Plant

July 11th, 2008 · 1 Comment

What is the attitude of Kansans toward coal-fired power plants?
Opponents of these plants have polls purportedly telling us that a majority of Kansans are opposed to them. See the press release Kansans Support Denial of Coal Plants, Want Wind Power for New Electricity from GPACE, a group headed by Scott Allegrucci, a former actor [...]

[Read more →]

Tags: Environment

Kansas Environmental Policy is Full of Uncertainty

July 9th, 2008 · No Comments

In a January 17, 2008 Wichita Eagle editorial, Nancy Jackson of the Climate and Energy Project of the Land Institute claims that Roderick L. Bremby, Secretary of the Kansas Department of Health and Environment, did not create regulatory uncertainty when he denied the permit for the expansion of a coal-fired power plant in Kansas.
A dubious [...]

[Read more →]

Tags: Environment

Earthjustice in Kansas: What is Their Agenda?

June 29th, 2008 · 1 Comment

Yesterday I posted Kansas Governor Kathleen Sebelius at Earthjustice, about Kansas governor Kathleen Sebelius speaking at a event hosted by Earthjustice, a group that I believe has a radical environmentalist agenda.
Just what is the agenda of the group? Do they have the interests of Kansas in mind, or something else?
I asked a few blogger [...]

[Read more →]

Tags: Environment

Americans For Prosperity Hot Air Tour in Wichita

May 1st, 2008 · No Comments

On May 1, 2008, the Americans For Prosperity Hot Air Tour made its stop in Wichita, Kansas. It was too windy for the big hot air balloon (who could have guessed that might be the case in the Kansas springtime?) but the speakers spoke as planned, and that’s the important part of this event.

Some photos that I took may be viewed here.

Some of the material from AFP:

Climate alarmists have bombarded citizens with apocalyptic scenarios and pressured them into environmental political correctness. It’s time to tell the other side of the story.

Climate Schemes Mean Higher Taxes

  • A cap-and-trade system would amount to a $1.19 trillion tax hike over the next ten years, according to the Congressional Budget Office.
  • Energy taxes would drive gas over $8.00 per gallon and more than double electricity bills, according to a study by the American Council for Capital Formation.
  • Revenue from energy taxes or permit sales will be used by bureaucratic central planners to pick politically-favored but horribly ineffective alternatives, like ethanol.

Cap-and-Trade is a Massive Job-Killer

  • The hundreds of billions of dollars of economic activity destroyed by the cap-and-trade tax scheme translate into millions of lost jobs for American workers.
  • We would trade millions of productive private sector jobs, for a smaller number of jobs created by a government regulatory scheme.

Climate Alarmism Threatens Freedom

  • The inevitable result of energy regulation is centralized control of the economy and our lives. The government has already banned incandescent light bulbs even though replacements, compact fluorescent bulbs, contain toxic mercury.
  • California wants to place radio control devices in thermostats so the government can set the temperature in homes and businesses.
  • Higher energy costs will increase the price of any product that is transported to market; these effects will ripple through the economy. Food prices have been especially hard hit, with milk prices up 20% in the last year.
  • State climate panels want to return to 55 MPH speed limits.

Radical Proposals will have Very Little Impact

  • Cap and trade policies are already failing to reduce CO2 emissions in Europe. In fact, emissions covered under their legislation in Europe have gone up according to the think tank, Open Europe.
  • Even if the cap and trade scheme actually reduce emissions in the United States – despite failures in Europe, climate models show that the reductions would have an impact of approximately 0.1 degree Celsius in the year 2100.

Low-Income Families will be Hit Hardest

  • Low-income families pay a much larger share of their income on goods that will be affected by these policies.
  • Higher energy and food prices are a genuine hardship for low-income Americans, even if they are an affordable indulgence for Al Gore, who already spends tens of thousands of dollars on his home energy bills.

[Read more →]

Tags: Environment

Global Warming: The Real Threat

October 29th, 2007 · No Comments

Those sounding the alarm over global warming are full of evidence of rising temperatures and man’s contribution to them. Rarely, however, do I read of what these advocates proscribe as the cure for global warming, and if one is given, we don’t often hear of the grave damage the cure would do to our economy and standard of living.

The following article by George Resiman explains what caps on carbon dioxide emissions mean in terms of our economy. I wish that Roderick L. Bremby, secretary of the Kansas Department of Health and Environment, had read this article before making his recent decision denying the applications to build two coal-fired plants in Kansas. His reasoning for the denial: “it would be irresponsible to ignore emerging information about the contribution of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases to climate change and the potential harm to our environment and health if we do nothing.”

I had the distinct pleasure of meeting Professor Reisman this summer, and I attended several of his lectures at Mises University in Auburn, Alabama. I am reading, slowly but surely, his monumental book Capitalism, which he inscribed for me. His website at www.capitalism.net and blog at www.georgereisman.com are valuable resources. You can read the full version of this article at http://georgereisman.com/blog/2007/05/global-warming-is-not-threat-but.html.

Global Warming Is Not a Threat But the Environmentalist Response to It Is

The UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change recently released the summary of its latest, forthcoming report on global warming. It’s most trumpeted finding is that the existence of global warming is now “unequivocal.”

Although such anecdotal evidence as January’s snowfall in Tucson, Arizona and freezing weather in Southern California and February’s more than 100-inch snowfall in upstate New York might suggest otherwise, global warming may indeed be a fact. It may also be a fact that it is a by-product of industrial civilization (despite, according to The New York Times of November 7, 2006, two ice ages having apparently occurred in the face of carbon levels in the atmosphere 16 times greater than that of today, millions of years before mankind’s appearance on earth).

If global warming and mankind’s responsibility for it really are facts, does anything automatically follow from them? Does it follow that there is a need to limit and/or reduce carbon emissions and the use of the fossil fuels—oil, coal, and natural gas—that gives rise to the emissions? The need for such limitation and/or rollback is the usual assumption.

Nevertheless, the truth is that nothing whatever follows from these facts. Before any implication for action can be present, additional information is required.

[Read more →]

Tags: Environment

Recycle, If You Wish

April 28th, 2007 · No Comments

Should we in Wichita or Sedgwick County be forced to recycle?

Prices for commodities and goods represent the best available information about the worth of them — that is, unless the government is manipulating prices. The prices people are willing to pay for recycled goods, therefore, tell us everything we need to know about their worth. These prices tell us that there isn’t much worth in most recycled goods.

It’s not that there aren’t markets for recycled goods. About 75% of automobiles are recycled, and used cardboard is often recycled in commercial settings. That’s because the price paid for these recycled items is high enough that, in the proper context, recycling can be profitable.

A household setting is different. Recycling of household goods, mostly newsprint, plastics, and glass, (aluminum cans being a possible exception) doesn’t pay very well. In fact, it costs households to recycle. The prices that recyclers can get for these recycled goods doesn’t even cover the cost of collecting them from households, as evidenced by the fact that in Wichita households must pay someone to pick up recyclables. People can deliver these items to recycling centers, but that involves significant cost to the household.

How much does recycling cost? Orange County in Florida spends roughly $3 million per year to collect recyclables, but sells them for only $56,000.

What about saving the environment through recycling? The contribution of household recycling towards this goal is not certain, once you look beyond the usual recycling propaganda and realize the role that prices play.

Running out of landfill space? If landfill space were truly scarce, landfill operators could charge high prices for trash disposal. But evidently, they don’t.

Running out of raw materials? That’s not happening. If raw materials were scarce, the price of recycled alternatives would increase. Instead, prices for most recycled goods are low and not increasing. We should be happy that raw materials are inexpensive and that manufacturing processes are efficient.

What this means is that household recycling doesn’t pay. Instead, it costs, and costs a lot.

If recycling is voluntary, each person can exercise their own judgment as to the value of recycling versus other activities. With forced recycling, people have to give up activities that they value more than recycling to comply with the mandate. Additionally, we have to pay recycling fees or additional taxes to cover the costs of money-losing recycling efforts.

Then there’s the recycling police. We have violent crimes that actually hurt people being committed daily. I think most people would rather have police focusing their attention on those crimes rather than inspecting our trash looking for the wayward aluminum can or newspaper.

[Read more →]

Tags: Environment